 |
| Pâ•qidꞋ Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋ u |
2004.07.12 Muslim Arab children's time in getting to school is more important than Jewish children's lives in getting blown up and not getting to school at all! That's the ruling of the UN's "judicial" arm, the ICJ, based on the UN's Resolutions, defined by the UN as "international law," at the Hague.
The ICJ, also known as the World Court, is the "principal judicial organ of the United Nations" ("International Court of Justice, United Nations" Encarta 95)
Their rulings are based principally on UN resolutions! That says it all. Talk about "Catch 22" UN confirms UN ICJ confirms UN Resolutions confirms UN confirms UN ICJ confirms …
Harvard's Prof. of Law Alan Dershowitz commented on the ruling the day before it was handed down because UN miso-Judaic bigotry is a given that's easily predicted by anyone. " … the questionable status of the International Court of Justice in The Hague. No Israeli judge may serve on that court as a permanent member, while sworn enemies of Israel serve among its judges, several of whom represent countries that do not abide by the rule of law. Virtually every democracy [over 30; ybd] voted against that court's taking jurisdiction over the fence case, while nearly every country that voted to take jurisdiction was a tyranny. Israel owes the International court absolutely no deference…
Dershowitz continued, "The International Court of Justice … discounted the saving of lives and focused only on the Palestinian interests. By showing its preference for Palestinian property rights over the lives of Jews, the International Court displayed its bigotry.
"The International Court of Justice is much like a Mississippi court in the 1930s. The all-white Mississippi court, which excluded blacks from serving on it, could do justice in cases between whites, but it was incapable of doing justice in cases between a white and a black. It would always favor white litigants. So, too, the International Court. It is perfectly capable of resolving disputes between Sweden and Norway, but it is incapable of doing justice where Israel is involved, because Israel is the excluded black when it comes to that court indeed when it comes to most United Nations organs.
"A judicial decision can have no legitimacy when rendered against a nation that is willfully excluded from the court's membership by bigotry.
"Just as the world should have disregarded any decision against blacks rendered by a Mississippi court in the 1930s, so too should all decent people contemptuously disregard the bigoted decisions of the International Court of Justice when it comes to Israel. To give any credence to the decisions of that court is to legitimize bigotry …
"The decision of the International Court of Justice against Israel should harm the reputation of that court in the minds of objective observers rather than damage the credibility of Israel … all it deserves is the contempt of decent people for its bigoted processes an its predetermine partisan result" (The Jerusalem Post, 2004.07.11).
The U.S. withdrew from the ICJ in 1985 under Pres. Reagan, leaving only 43 nations that accepted the court's compulsory jurisdiction. China, Russia, France and Germany also refused to recognize its authority. It isn't a world court. It's a European-Arab-Asian-Muslim court.
It's ruling is unsustainable in logic. The court ruled that Israel constructed a fence outside its borders. But no borders have been established or recognized in that area!!! Thus, the ICJ's ruling is nonsensical and self-contradicting. Moreover, the ICJ declared, contrary to fact, that the relevant history of the region began in 1967, "there being no need for any inquiry into the precise prior status of those territories."
 |
|
 |