Home (Netzarim Logo)

Vayetze
Yemenite Weekly Torah Reading (Netzarim Israel)

וַיֵּצֵא
(bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 28.10—32.3) 'בראשית כ"ח י'—ל"ב ג
bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 32.1-3 :(Ma•phᵊtirꞋ) מפטיר
TorâhHaphtârâhÂmar Ribi YᵊhoshuaMᵊnorat ha-Maor

Rainbow Rule

5767 (2006.11)

To minimize the enormous bandwidth consumed by video data (disk space, dictating loading time), as much content as possible is diverted to the text section (below), with the video handling only the parts that cannot be handled as well by text alone. For this reason, videos are archived in YouTube. Ta•na"khꞋ selections are read from the SeiphꞋër Tor•âhꞋ ha-Tei•mân•iꞋ, the כֶּתֶר אֲרָם צוֹבָא (Aleppo Codex), an Artscroll Ta•na"khꞋ or iQIsa, as appropriate, and pronounced according to No•sakhꞋ Tei•mân•itꞋ.

Note: YouTube, upon being acquired by Google, deleted our account and our videos – leaving a host of phonies calling themselves "Netzarim."
Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5764 (2004.11)

Har ha-Bayit (Har Moriyah) fm Nakhal Qidron
Click to enlargeHar ha-BaꞋyit (aka Har Mor•i•yâhꞋ), showing the "East Gate," photographed from NaꞋkhal Qi•dᵊronꞋ.

Click to enlarge. The bottom section of the sign reads Har ha-•BaꞋyit in Hebrew, "Haram ash Sharif" (the Noble Sanctuary) in Arabic and "Mt. Moriah" (i.e., Har Mor•i•yâhꞋ) in English. Photograph © 1983 by Yirmᵊyahu Bën-David.

‫28.11 — וַיִּפְגַּע בַּמָּקוֹם

הַמָּקוֹם is identified by the Sages as הַר מּוֹרִיָּה in יְרוּשָׁלַיִם. Further, הַמָּקוֹם is a metonym for י--ה, because י--ה being represented and revered there is what transforms מָּקוֹם to הַמָּקוֹם. Millions of uninitiated read this passage hundreds of times without ever recognizing the association. Yet, the dual meaning derived from this passage.

וַיִּקַּח מֵאַבְנֵי הַמָּקוֹם וַיָּשֶׂם מְרַאֲשֹׁתָיו

In bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 49.24, Tor•âhꞋ instructs that Yo•seiphꞋ, as Prime Minister of Mi•tzᵊr•ayꞋim, "shepherded the אֶבֶן of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ." The editors of the Artscroll Stone Edition Ta•na"khꞋ remark, "The word stone denotes the primary personage of the nation, as it is used in Zᵊkharyah] 4:7"—which refers not merely to Zᵊru-Ba•vëlꞋ but, beyond him, to Tᵊhil•imꞋ 118.22 in the Ha•leilꞋ, which speaks of the Mâ•shiꞋakh (see also Yᵊsha•yâhꞋu 28.16).

אֶבֶן also represents יְרוּשָׁלַיִם (Zᵊkharyah 12.2), manifesting a convergence of several elements of the symbolism of אֶבֶן and הַמָּקוֹם—which is in יְרוּשָׁלַיִם.

This theme is elaborated in the KhoꞋshën of the Ko•heinꞋ ha-Ja•dolꞋ, in which אֲבָנִים represented the twelve tribes of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ. The theme—אֲבָנִים representing Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ—is then expanded in the description of Beit-Yisra•eil, the house (-hold) of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ—a virtual building, the stones of which are the nᵊphâsh•otꞋ of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ.

All of this is resolved in the realization that the אֲבָנִים of this Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ are the nᵊphâsh•otꞋ of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ whom they represent. The Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ is described as the Throne and Footstool for the Divine Presence (Yᵊkhëz•qeilꞋ 43.7). Yet, it is impossible to contain either His Throne or Himself in a physical building. Rather, He dwells in the hearts of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ. The true, real, Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ, therefore, is, ma•mâshꞋ, Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ; the household of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ, not any mere physical house.

The Teimân•imꞋ allude to this in their tᵊphil•otꞋ Sha•khar•itꞋ every Shab•âtꞋ reciting, then commenting on, Yᵊsha•yâhꞋu 54.13:

When all of בָּנַיִךְ are students of י--ה then the peace of בָּנָיִךְ will be great.

"Don't call them בָּנָיִךְ, but rather בּוֹנָיִךְ."

The context of this passage (54.11-12) is a description of the Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ in יְרוּשָׁלַיִם, immediately following the description of the chief cornerstone of this Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ, the Mâ•shiꞋakh (chapter 53)! The children of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ are builders of the Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ not because they make a career of stonemasonry but because they "build" Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ, the Throne and the Footstool of י--ה.

This is the solution to the enigma of the Beit-ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ described by Yᵊkhëz•qeilꞋ, which

  1. we are commanded to build before the advent of the Mâ•shiꞋakh (Bën-Dâ•widꞋ, not before the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ)—but,
  2. enigmatically until now, His Throne, which is (already!) in the heavens (Tᵊhil•imꞋ 2.4; 8.2; 11.4; 103.19; 113.4; 123.1 and 127.1; also Yᵊsha•yâhꞋu 6.1ff; Zᵊkhar•yâhꞋ 3.1-7), can only, therefore, descend from the heavens, and cannot be built by human hands (corroborated by Ma•sëkꞋët Suk•âhꞋ 41a, Ma•sëkꞋët Rosh ha-Shân•âhꞋ 30a and To•sâph•otꞋ (not to be confused with the תּוֹסֶפתָּא) Ma•sëkꞋët Shᵊvu•otꞋ 15b) and
  3. is significantly different from either of the earlier two, worldly and physical, Bât•eiꞋ ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ—which, if the third Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ were similarly worldly and physical, would pose the conundrum of a dramatic change from the tav•nitꞋ of the first two (rather than the fulfillment in the non-physical realm of the earthly tav•nitꞋ) – deviation from the tav•nitꞋ in contradiction to Ha•lâkh•âhꞋ.

Understanding the nᵊphâsh•otꞋ of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ as the אַבְנֵי Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ is the only solution to all of these constraints. This lone solution also implies new understandings of prophecies regarding music on Shab•âtꞋ, turning the fasts into feasts and the ultimate disposition of Har ha-BaꞋyit:

  1. Note that Mikh•âhꞋ 4.1 specifies that in the end of days the Mountain of the House (not the House per se) of י--ה will be firmly established, and
  2. Yᵊsha•yâhꞋu 56.7:
    כִּי בֵיתִי בֵּית-תְּפִלָּה יִקָּרֵא לְכָל-הָעַמִּים
    (Because My House shall be called a House of Prayer for all kindreds).

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5760 (1999.11)

My friend's wedding khupah and Rav Qapakh
Click to enlargeFriend's wedding khup•âhꞋ, officiated by Rav Qapakh (1998, click to enlarge)

י--ה often likens the relationship between Himself and Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ as a marriage, with Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ as the bride.

Ya•a•qovꞋ's dealings with his uncle Lâ•vânꞋ share many parallels with the cosmic marriage between Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ and י--ה. In the analogy we find in this week's pâ•râsh•âhꞋ, Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ's uncle Lâ•vânꞋ parallels Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ's heavenly Father—י--ה, while Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ is Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ in both facets of the analogy.

‫29.26 – לֹא-יֵעָשֶֹה כֵן בִּמְקוֹמֵנוּ; לָתֵת הַצְּעִירָה לִפְנֵי הַבְּכִירָה:


Yael's Wedding 2012
Wedding – Khup•âhꞋ, Tzᵊvi & Yâ•eilꞋ (2012)

As an agent and representative of י--ה, the Mâ•shiꞋakh's relationship to Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ likewise necessarily shares many similarities with marriage. It's well established and accepted among the Sages that the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ must precede the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ. In this analogy, soft-eyed Lei•âhꞋ corresponds to the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ—the first to appear—while the outstanding in appearance Râkh•eilꞋ parallels the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ.

Despite this, without acknowledging the coming of the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ many Jews expect the coming of the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ. As we read in bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 29.26, such isn't done in הַמָּקוֹם – also a well-known appellation of י--ה (perhaps implying a "devout community") – to give or allow [in marriage] the younger before the senior.

7

"The number seven represents the cycle of completion in Creation'" (Artscroll, Vayikra, III(b).425). Comments on numerology are excerpted or based on Jay Kappraff, Dept. of Mathematics at the New Jersey Institute of Technology, Connections, The Geometric Bridge between Art and Science, McGraw-Hill, 1991, p.4 and "Numbers, Typical and Important," Ency. Jud., 12.1257. (See also 70. Numerology is also covered in pâ•râsh•otꞋ Ta•zᵊriꞋa and bᵊ-Ha•al•otᵊkhâꞋ.)

  1. "The natural number 1 was called the monad, the origin of all numbers.

  2. The dyad 2 was the first feminine number and represented the first stage of creation, the split into the mutually dependent opposites of positive-negative, hot-cold, moist-dry, etc.

  3. The number 3, the first masculine number, represented the second stage of creation, the productive union of negative and positive which follows the separation and refinement of these opposite elements. Associating a man-god with Trinity is no accident.

  4. The number 4 is associated with the four points of the compass, thus signifying completeness in the world.

  5. The sum of the first feminine and the first masculine number, 5, represented man, the 5 fingers and 5 senses, microcosmos, harmony, love, and health. An example is the 5-pointed star.

  6. 6 represented inanimate objects (e.g. crystals and snowflakes). An example is the 6-pointed star (which is animated only by the incorporation of י--ה in the center), formed by 12 points of intersection (two interlocking tetraktyses representing two interlocking universes—physical and spiritual).

  7. Seven Heavens of Ancient Astronomy
    Click to enlargeSeven Heavens of Ancient Astronomy
  8. Seven "was sacred to Semitic and other peoples, including the Egyptians, Assyrians, Persians, and the Vedic folk in India. Its importance is often derived from the worship of the seven [then known] heavenly bodies."

    Perceived as gods by the ancients, the days of the week are still named after them:

    1. sun(day),

    2. moon(day),

    3. Mars=Tiwes(day),

    4. Mercury=Oden('sday),

    5. Zeus=Jupiter=Thor('sday),

    6. Venus=Frige(day) and

    7. Saturn(day).

    Seven was, therefore, understood as the complete number of the heavens. As a result, particularly in prophecy, seven symbolizes a perfect number – and a perfect period of time.

Just as 'seven years' of service was required of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ for each wife, so, too, 'seven years' of service is required of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ for each Mâ•shiꞋakh. However, the 'seven years' of service are required not only prior to the coming of Lei•âhꞋ = the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ, but also a second 'seven years' of "watchguarding" (see the Haphtâr•âhꞋ) after the appearance of the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ and before the coming of Râkh•eilꞋ = the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ.

Thus, the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ won't be coming anytime soon unless the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ appeared 'seven years' ago!

The reaction to this belated realization is predictable (29.25): "And it became morning, and look, it was Lei•âhꞋ!!!"

Speaking to Lâ•vânꞋ—who corresponds in the analogy to י--ה—Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ asks incredulously: "What have you done to me!?!"

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5759 (1998.10)

wormhole conduit
Wormhole Conduit (Physics Theory)

"Wa-Yei•tzeiꞋ is unusual in that [in the SeiphꞋër Tor•âhꞋ] it contains not a single space between paragraphs. In the masoretic order of the Seipher Tor•âhꞋ, the entire sidrah (section) is written as a single pâ•suqꞋ; ending the one is beginning the next – like a (physics theory) wormhole conduit bringing two distant points of the physical universe to contiguity. This is meant to imply that Ya•a•qovꞋ never ceased his concentration on the predicament of being parted from the Holy Land." (ArtScroll, "BeReishis," I(b).1178) Indeed, this pâ•râsh•âhꞋ doesn't even begin on a new line, and is therefore designated as סְתוּמָה (Artscroll, 1217).

28.13 — Why does this pâ•suqꞋ not read 'I am י--ה, Ël•oh•imꞋ of Av•râ•hâmꞋ and Ël•oh•imꞋ of Yitzkhaq your father'? Instead, it reads ''I am י--ה, Eloh•imꞋ of Av•râ•hâmꞋ your father'! But Av•râ•hâmꞋ was the grandfather, the father of Yi•tzᵊkhâqꞋ Âv•iꞋnu, not Ya•a•qovꞋ!

This was because י--ה intended that the legacy of Av•râ•hâmꞋ should pass to Ya•a•qovꞋ via messianic Yi•tzᵊkhâqꞋ Âv•iꞋnu as a conduit. This is another way in which Yi•tzᵊkhâqꞋ Âv•iꞋnu prefigured the Mâ•shiꞋakh who, in his two roles of Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ and Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ, would be the conduit connecting the realm of physical Ya•a•qovꞋ with the spiritual realm of Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ, the conduit conceptualizing the convergence of the physical realm with the realm of the heavens.

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5758 (1997.12)

Sulam Yaaqov
Click to enlarge
סֻלַּם יַעֲקֹב
(Graphic: Zhang theorized 4-D space-time crys­tal eternal clock; space.com, Berkeley Lab)

‫28.12 — סֻלָם מֻצָּב אַרְצָה

וְרֹאשׁוֹ מַגִּיעַ הַשָּׁמָיְמָה

The ה- (-âh; -ward) ending is significant. The pâ•suqꞋ doesn't state that the סֻלָם reached from heaven to earth, or the converse. These endings stipulate only the direction of the top and bottom of the ladder. The bottom was oriented toward the earth—earthward—and the top was oriented toward the heavens—heavenward.

מַלְאֲכֵי אֱלֹהִים עֹלִים וְיֹרְדִים בּוֹ

The Artscroll editors ask "First ascending and then descending?" While their answer was logically short of compelling, it's, nevertheless, an astute observation. In Ta•na"khꞋ, מַלְאֲכֵי י--ה are, without exception, always human messengers. It, then, makes sense that, in tᵊphil•âhꞋ, מַלְאֲכֵי י--ה must first ascend (in tᵊphil•âhꞋ), and then return (namely, the conclusion of their tᵊphil•otꞋ).

[Pᵊsiqta Zutrata] observes that Ya•a•qovꞋ's dream is unusual in that its interpretation—unlike the other prophetic dreams recorded in Scripture—is not given in the Tor•âhꞋ.

To paraphrase a remark by Einstein, י--ה isn't deliberately cryptic. Tor•âhꞋ explicitly states this (Dᵊvâr•imꞋ 30.11-14). This implies that, if the meaning weren't conspicuous to readers at the time of giving the Tor•âhꞋ, there would be an explanation. That there is no need for an explanation therefore implies that this obvious explanation is indeed correct.

Einstein

Einstein's rebuke of an atheist is consistently ignored by atheists:

"Try and penetrate with our limited means the secrets of nature and you will find that, behind all the discernible concatenations, there remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion. To that extent I am, in point of fact, religious." – Albert Einstein

Artscroll editors suggest two primary symbolisms of the סֻלָם: the giving of Tor•âhꞋ at Har Sin•aiꞋ and the Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh. As the Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh is, in turn, symbolic of tᵊphil•âhꞋ, this supports our premise that the סֻלָם represents tᵊphil•âhꞋ.

Ibn 'Ezra, the Artscroll editors note, concurs. "The סֻלָם represents the vehicle by which one's tᵊphil•âhꞋ ascends to heaven and by which salvation descends from heaven (R. Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Yehudah)." (Artscroll, Bereishis I(b):1226).

"Ibn 'Ezra concludes, however, that the most acceptable interpretation is that the סֻלָם is emblematic of the link between the earthly and the heavenly spheres." (ibid.).

If Ibn 'Ezra had used slightly more technical terms, we seem to be in complete agreement to this point. We see the סֻלָם as emblematic of the link between the dimensional (physical) universe and the non-dimensional Realm.

Commenting on Ramba"mꞋ's discussion of Mor•ëhꞋ Nᵊvukh•imꞋ 1:15, the Artscroll editors note: The מַלאָכִים in this context represent the Nᵊviy•imꞋ. The attainment of a certain height of the סֻלָם [i.e., of wisdom] precedes the descent—where the knowledge thus acquired is expected to be applied for the training and instruction of mankind. (Artscroll, Bereishis, I(b ): 1226).

First, מַלְאֲכֵי י--ה ascend to obtain guidance in how to serve Him and how to please Him. Thus illuminated and strengthened, they then descend to carry out their mission, illuminating others.

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5753 (1992.12)

Has anyone ever wondered why Ya•a•qovꞋ made such an uncomfortable pillow—out of stones? In the Hebrew, Ya•a•qovꞋ took stones from the Place and set them as מְרַאֲשֹׁתָיו, not necessarily "under his head."

Rather than under his head, I suggest that Ya•a•qovꞋ used the stones to form a windbreak and/or some protection against being spotted and attacked by animals and/or bandits.

With his head toward a semi-circle of fair-sized rocks, facing his campfire under the heavens, Ya•a•qovꞋ falls into a dream state. Perhaps he was still half-awake as he began to dream, watching the tongue of flame from his campfire lick into the starry Yi•sᵊrâ•eilꞋi night sky above his bedroll like a סֻלָם. The tongues of flame appeared like מַלאָכִים ascending and descending along the סֻלָם of flames. In the smoke at the top of the flames above him he presages the Shᵊkhin•âhꞋ of י--ה positioned at the head of the סֻלָם of flame.

While the English reads that י--ה "stood above" the סֻלָם, in Hebrew י--ה is "positioned/stationed on/above/over him." The word on / over / above is the same in Hebrew. The Hebrew masc. pronoun can be rendered either as "it" (the סֻלָם, which is a masc. noun) or as "him" (Ya•a•qovꞋ).

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page

blue glitter bar

הפטרה

(Haphtâr•âhꞋ; resolution, wrap-up, dismissal) Tei•mân•itꞋ Bal•ad•itꞋ:

הושע י"א ז'—י"ב ט"ו

The Haph•târ•atꞋ Tei•mân•itꞋ is Ho•sheiꞋa 11.7 – 12.14,
not the Sᵊphâ•râd•itꞋ Ho•sheiꞋa 11.7 – 12.2 (some to 13.5) or Ash•kᵊnazꞋit Ho•sheiꞋa 12.13 – 14.10.

5760 (1999.11)

Aram
Click to enlargeKhâ•rânꞋ, A•râmꞋ(Anglicized to "Haran" or "Harran"; in modern Turkey, near Syrian border)
ca. B.C.E. 1947

‫12.13 – וַיִּבְרַח יַעֲקֹב שְׂדֵה אֲרָם; וַיַּעֲבֹד יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּאִשָּׁה, וּבְאִשָּׁה שָׁמַר:

Ya•a•qovꞋ worked seven years for the wife he eschewed (Lei•âhꞋ = Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ) before he qualified to work seven years for the wife for whom he yearned (Râkh•eilꞋ = Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ).


Haran, Syria ( in modern Turkey) - mud-brick houses with unique, iconic, conic roofs
Click to enlargeKhâ•rânꞋ, A•râmꞋ (in modern southern Turkey, near their Syrian border) – mud-brick houses with unique, iconic, conic roofs

Given the eschatological meaning of time cited earlier, the messianic parallel of Ya•a•qovꞋ working 'seven years' for his first wife, Lei•âhꞋ, is the 'perfect period' (7 in numerology) in Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ's history for the appearance of the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ. The second 'seven years' in which Ya•a•qovꞋ worked for his second wife, Râkh•eilꞋ, corresponds to the time between the appearance of the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ, Ribi Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ Bën-Dâ•widꞋ, to the coming of the Mâ•shiꞋakh Bën-Dâ•widꞋ, the post-mortal—i.e., spiritual, in spirit / teaching—manifestation of Ribi Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Dâ•widꞋ.

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5759 (1998.10)

12.7— "Therefore, you return in your Ël•oh•imꞋ, keep (watchguard) khësꞋëd and mi•shᵊpâtꞋ, and hope toward your Ël•oh•imꞋ eternally."

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page
Rainbow Rule

5753 (1992.12)

13:4 — "An Ël•oh•imꞋ beside Me you do not know, and there is no military-savior בלתי (bilti; without/except) Me." "Beside me" in Hebrew is זולתי (zulati). בלתי means "without," "except" or even "except by'" This pâ•suqꞋ is not always rendered accurately in English versions. "Military-savior" is מושיע (moshia), from ישע (yasha; he saved [militarily]).

14:10 — What could more vividly describe the error of Christianity (and, to a lesser extent, the Benei Noakh) and Jews who assimilate? "For straightforward are the ways of י--ה and the tzadiq•imꞋ walk in them, but willful-transgressors [of Tor•âhꞋ] will be caused to stumble by them."

They have heard of many of the teachings of Tor•âhꞋ, but do not feel compelled to obey them. As Ribi Yᵊho•shuꞋa said regarding teshuvah about how those who hear the Saying of the ways of י--ה respond to it (NHM 13.1-9): "the stone upon which the seeds fell is the one who hears the Saying and suddenly he takes it with joy. Since he has no root therefore he is short-lived, and when there becomes trouble or persecution on account of the Saying, suddenly he stumbles."

To these with hearts of stone, Tor•âhꞋ-observance is acceptable only as long as it is convenient and attractive. When pressures of business, society and the like conflict with Tor•âhꞋ-observance, (s)he who is a transgressor in heart stumbles.

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page

blue glitter bar

אמר ריבי יהושע

(•marꞋ RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa)

מתתיהו בעברית

Ma•tit•yâhꞋu bᵊ-Ivᵊr•itꞋ; Hebrew Ma•tit•yâhꞋu —
NHM

(Redacted, Christianized & corrupted to 4th-century "Matthew")

5760 (1999.11)

Alexandria Library (Bibliotheca Alexandria)
Click to enlargeAlexandria Library (Bibliotheca Alexandria), built on the site of the ancient Library of Alexandria, Mi•tzᵊr•ayꞋim, heart of the Greatest University of the ancient world (B.C.E. 288 – ca. 400 C.E.), vanished "coincidental" with rise of Christianity and Roman internal conflicts.

‫Ho•sheiꞋa 11.1 –
וּמִמִּצְרַיִם קָרָאתִי לִבְנִי

This passage, introducing this week's Haphtâr•âhꞋ and providing its context, presages RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa as the Mâ•shiꞋakh (NHM 2.13-15):

When the ma•lâkh•imꞋ who had requested Yᵊho•shuꞋa had returned, look, a malakh of י--ה appeared to Yo•seiphꞋ in a dream saying, "Having arisen, take the little boy and his mother and flee into Mi•tzᵊr•ayꞋim; and stay there until I speak to you. For Herod the Great is impending to request that the little boy be killed. Having arisen, Yo•seiphꞋ took the little boy and his mother by night, and retired into Mi•tzᵊr•ayꞋim (and remained there until the end of Herod the Great) in order that it would be fulfilled that which was spoken by י--ה through Ho•sheiꞋa ha-Nâ•viꞋ saying, "Out of Mi•tzᵊr•ayꞋim I called My son."

Antikythera Artefact ca. BCE 60
Click to enlargeΑντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) analog computer that calculated and displayed positions of the seven then-known planets along with varying orbital speeds and moon phases; ca. B.C.E. 60 (!!!) See also Computer Tomographic X-rays that show 30 bronze gears

This, of course, is where RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa, after fleeing to Egypt (and because his education had been financed by the Persian astronomers) would have been educated. The knowledge contained in the Library of Alexandria continues to astound scientists. One of the most startling discoveries proving the advanced state of science among the Greeks, is the ca. B.C.E. 60 (not a typo!!!) analog mechanical computer-clock retrieved from an ancient, Roman-era, shipwreck off the coast of the Greek Island of Αντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn). About the size of a shoebox, the "AntikūthæꞋrōn Artefact" is a mechanical model of the Solar System that calculated and displayed the relative positions and motions of the "seven planets" and the moon, which made up the then-known solar system. Such a model wasn't known to exist before it was reinvented again nearly 1¾ millennia later—in 1704 C.E.!!!

Αντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact actual-size working model by Michael Wright. The outer ring displays months and 365 days. The inner ring displays the 12 Zodiac signs.
Αντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact, Wright model face" alt= "Αντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact, Wright model face" />
Click to enlargeΑντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact, Wright model face (click to enlarge)

With the rise of Christianity, extra-church information was suppressed and polemicized as Satanic, baptizing Europe in the Dark Ages. During this period, the Greek body of knowledge, which had already migrated into Arabic countries of the middle east by the 4th century C.E., continued to progress in Islamic Arabic countries until, with the decline of the Church's power in the Renaissance Era (15th century C.E.), scientific knowledge began to migrate back to Europe – and stagnate in Islamic Arab countries as Islamic clerics, like the Christian clerics before them, increasingly suppressed extra-mosque knowledge. Demonstrating that people never learn, today Ultra-Orthodox (Costume Jewry – בְּנֵי עִדָּן חָשׁוּךְ) rabbis are doing their utmost to suppress and polemicize extra-yeshiva science and knowledge as "Greek philosophy," "Epicurean" and "goyim".

Αντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact model telescopic view, ca BCE 60" alt= "Αντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact model telescopic view, ca BCE 60" />
Click to enlargeΑντικυθήρων (AntikūthæꞋrōn) Artefact—telescopic view

The lesson here is that the education that RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa received at Alexandria University and Library is astonishingly more advanced than historians have, until very recently, imagined; and would, as a result of this education (that was in addition to his rabbinic education as a student of RibꞋi Nâ•siꞋ Ja•mᵊl•iy•eilꞋ), have far excelled his peers in Yi•sᵊrâ•eilꞋ.

RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa may have seen, operated and learned to understand one of these while a student at the Greatest Library in the Ancient World – the Alexandrian Library and University.

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page

5771 (2010.11)

אָמַר רִבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ


Tor•âhꞋ Translation Mid•râshꞋ RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa: NHM NHM
bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 29.35

She conceived yet again, and gave birth to a bein, and she said, "This time אוֹדֶה אֶת-י--ה, therefore she called his sheim יְהוּדָה;

וַתַּעֲמֹד from giving birth.

The scroll 1.1.0 of the generations 1.1.1 of Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Dâ•widꞋ 1.1.2 Bën-Av•râ•hâmꞋ, the Mâ•shiꞋakh: 1.1.3

Av•râ•hâmꞋfathered
Yitz•khâqꞋand Yitz•khâqꞋ fathered
Ya•a•qovꞋand…

1.2-17
Ha•phƏtâr•âhꞋ Ho•sheiꞋa 11.1

For a youth is Yi•sᵊ•râ•eilꞋ and I have loved him; and from out of Mitz•raꞋyim; 2.13.1 I called My son.

When the ma•lâkh•imꞋ 1.20.1 who had requested Yᵊho•shuꞋa had returned,2.13.0 look… a ma•lâkhꞋ 1.20.1 of 'ה‎ 1.22.1 appeared to Yo•seiphꞋ in a dream saying, "Having arisen, take the little boy and his mother and flee into Mitz•raꞋyim; 2.13.1 and stay there until I speak to you. For Herod the Great 2.1.2 is impending to request 7.7.1 that the little boy be killed." 14 Having arisen, Yo•seiphꞋ took the little boy and his mother by night, and retired into Mitz•raꞋyim 15 (and remained there until the end of Herod the Great) 2.1.2 in order that it would be fulfilled 5.17.3 that which was spoken 2.15.0 by 'ה‎ 1.22.1 through Ho•sheiꞋa ha-Nâ•viꞋ 11.9.1 [11:1] saying, "Out of Mitz•raꞋyim I called My son." 2.15.1

2.13-15

Go to Top
Return to Previous Page

Rainbow Rule

blue glitter bar

מְנוֹרַת הַמָּאוֹר של"ה

Mᵊnor•atꞋ ha-Mâ•orꞋ by Yi•tzᵊkhâqꞋ Abuhav

Translated by Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋu & Yâ•eilꞋ Bën-Dâvid.

("The [Seven-Branched] Candelabra of Light"), The Teimân•imꞋ Yᵊhud•imꞋ' Ancient Halakhic debate, Corrupted into the Zo•harꞋ & medieval Qa•bâl•âhꞋ

At Beit-ha-KᵊnësꞋët Morëshët Âvot—Yad Nâ•âmi here in Ra•a•nanꞋâ(h), Yi•sᵊr•â•eilꞋ, liturgy for a regular Shab•âtꞋ concludes with one of the members reciting the following portion of Mᵊnor•atꞋ ha-Mâ•orꞋ by Yi•tzᵊkhâqꞋ Abuhav

© Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋu Bën-Dâ•widꞋ. All rights reserved. Copies, reproductions and/or retransmissions strictly prohibited.

Part 1 (of 4)

To the world-age a man should strive to be meek in all of his ways. For in this the Sages and the #Df-Tzadiq">tzadiq•imꞋ prided themselves—great meekness with more modesty; as we find in part of every Holy Writing (Shab•âtꞋ 118b) that Rabi Yosei prided himself on meekness, saying, From my days, none has seen happenings of contradictory sayings of my house. Accordingly, it is for a man to be cautious in his lying down and in his rising that he doesn't gloss over his contradictions outside of his bed.

Part 2 (of 4)

Part 3 (of 4)

Part 4 (of 4)

Under Construction

(Translated so far)

Rainbow Rule © 1996-present by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David,
Rainbow Rule
Go Top Home (Netzarim Logo) Go Back

Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ… Authentic