Home (Netzarim Logo)
Who Are the Nᵊtzâr•im? Live-Link Technology

Right now, as you read this, what global crisis in the news most worries you? Perhaps the growing threat of Muslim Jihadists terrorists in radical Islam, intent on forcing you, and your family, to obey sharia laws of the "true Abrahamic faith"? What about your brand of "Abrahamic faith"? Is yours the true Abrahamic faith because you were born in it (predestined)? Or do you ask serious questions only to be rebuked: "Just believe!"? Can a book claim that it's sole source, Ta•na"kh, is true and then contradict Ta•na"kh to override and supersede it? The contradiction demonstrates that one or the other is false! The Creator didn't contradict Himself. So which of the contradictory books are false?

Relative to dealing with global terrorism as well as your own personal afterlife and that of your family, nothing can be more urgent than digging through the millennia of noise down to the bedrock of the earliest extant source documents, in their original languages, to reveal the undiluted, single original, answer that resolves these conundrums for all who will study and educate themselves.

WAN takes a "don't trust me, look at the evidence yourself!" approach, holding your hand while explaining Hebrew perspective and terms, guiding you through the initial stages of this process; thus answering your questions as it also resolves the single, original reality-truth of the Abrahamic faith.

It is a religious conflict. Only education, over a considerable period, to the treasure introduced in WAN (and elaborated in its two successors in the series – Atonement In the Biblical 'New Covenant' (ABNC) and The Nᵊtzâr•im Reconstruction of Hebrew Ma•ti•tᵊyâhu (NHM, in English)), can ever cure the murderous cancer of apostasy from the original faith that pits the three faiths against each other.

Thus, WAN not only answers your most vexing personal questions about the faith of Avᵊrâ•hâm, WAN is the primer introducing the only possible key—the single earliest-documented historical truth—to future reconciliation of the educated illuminati among all three "Abrahamic faiths"; and, correspondingly, the glimmer of possible Middle East peace between Jews and our Arab cousins.

In Who Are the Nᵊtzâr•im?, the 16th Nᵊtzâr•im Pâ•qid, Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu, demonstrates, from meticulous and universally-accepted scholarly historical documentation, the evolution from the 1st century C.E. Tor•âh-teaching, historical Ribi Yᵊho•shua, in 1st-century Jewish synagogues, to the Hellenist Romans' syncretizing of Christianity and their Jesus-image, in non-Jewish churches, that finally emerged in 4th century Christianity and the church—as Christians know and teach it today.

In the 1st century C.E. Jewish community described with undisputed historical authority in (4Q) MMT of the Qum•rân (Dead Sea) scrolls, Jewish synagogues were the bastions of Pᵊrush•im, their rabbis and their Ribis—which included Ribi Yᵊho•shua and his Nᵊtzâr•im. While there was an occasional geir in a synagogue, gentiles never attended liturgy.

In the synagogues, exclusively amongst Pᵊrush•im, including Ribi Yᵊho•shua and his Nᵊtzâr•im, Ribis argued Pᵊrush•im Ha•lâkh•âh against the Tzᵊdoq•im Hellenists and their Greek Book of Decrees.

No definitively-Christian doctrine can be dated until after 135 C.E., and then only by 4th century C.E. documents. WAN explains why and how the Christian Church of the Holy Roman Empire developed—the root of every Christian sect today.

This is our introductory book after the Oxford scholar James Parkes' definitive doctoral thesis primer (The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue, A Study in the Origins of Anti-Semitism). WAN, as we affectionately call it, provides the necessary definitions and essential concepts needed to grasp all of our other materials. WAN covers a wealth of more advanced concepts essential to relating to and understanding the authentic—historically documented—1st-century Judaic concepts covered by the second book in our program, Atonement In the Biblical 'New Covenant' Live-Link Technology (ABNC), and the teachings of 'historically- documented Ribi Yᵊho•shua in The Nᵊtzâr•im Reconstruction of Hebrew Ma•ti•tᵊyâhu (NHM, in English).

Some of these basic and essential concepts and definitions will be an especially shocking revelation for non-Jews—even for those with academic credentials (including doctoral) schooled in 1st-century Judaic sources from Ta•lᵊmud to the Pseudepigrapha, CD, Eusebius, Josephus, and the Qum•rân Dead Sea Scrolls, as well as modern conversational or Biblical Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic.

Go Top Go Back

Atonement In the Biblical 'New Covenant' (ABNC) Live-Link Technology

Beginning from the ground-breaking work (published by Oxford) of the modern authority on Dead Sea Scroll (4Q) MMT, Bën-Gur•yōn University of the Nëgëv Prof. Ël•i•shâ Qimᵊrōn , Pâ•qid Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu carefully documents and demonstrates the development and state of 1st century C.E. Judaism, particularly Jews' relations with non-Jews in Yᵊhudâh under the Hellenist Roman occupation.

Atonement In the Biblical 'New Covenant' (ABNC) demonstrates the concept of 'New Covenant' ki•pur as understood and taught by its chief expositor in Ta•na"kh, Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu ha-Nâ•vi (Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu 31.30-33)—centuries before the advent of Christian displacement theology: "I will place My Tor•âh [not anything else] within them"!!! (them being explicitly defined as Jews who do their best to live according to Tor•âh, not goy•im).

Prior to the apostasy of Christian displacement theology, ki•pur was defined as the graciousness of ‑‑, granted to Jews (and geir•im) who do their utmost to live according to Tor•âh— "with all your heart and with all your nëphësh." Even for these, ki•pur was granted only upon tᵊshuv•âh from any transgressions of Tor•âh.

Anything different from this contradicts Tor•âh and, therefore, cannot be the teaching of the Mâ•shiakh defined by — and dependent for authenticity upon — Tor•âh.

Those who rely instead on faith in a post-135 C.E. gentile Roman syncretism of Egypto-Hellenist idolatry are being left behind with the Roman antichrist of 135 C.E. Check any encyclopedia to confirm what happened in "Aelia Capitolina" after the Romans crushed the Bar-Kōkh Revolt in 135 C.E. and when the gentile Hellenist Romans ousted the last Nᵊtzâr•im Pâ•qid, replacing him with the 1st gentile "pope-bishop." Don't be left out in the last day. ABNC explains the 1st-century relationship between Tor•âh ki•pur, Jews, geir•im, "G*o*d-Fearers" and goy•im—informing and enabling you to obtain ki•pur.

Relying on definitions and concepts introduced in the first of our 3 basic books series, WAN, the 16th Nᵊtzâr•im Pâ•qid, Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu, demonstrates in ABNC the understanding of the 'New Covenant' throughout the 1st-century Judean community in which historical Ribi Yᵊho•shua taught—Jews (and geir•im) in synagogues, not goy•im in churches.

This is the defining Nᵊtzâr•im primer on "salvation," and the follow-up book to WAN, the second required text in our Kha•vᵊr•utâ series (of 3).

Go Top Go Back

The Nᵊtzâr•im Reconstruction of Hebrew Ma•ti•tᵊyâhu (NHM, in English)

Before the 15th and last Nᵊtzâr•im Pâ•qid was ousted by the Romans and displaced with a gentile Roman pope-bishop in 135 C.E., The Nᵊtzâr•im Hebrew Ma•titᵊyâhu produced by the Nᵊtzâr•im was the defining, authoritative, polar opposite of the 4th century Egypto-Hellenist Roman "Gospel of Saint Matthew" produced by the idolatrous Hellenist Roman occupiers of Judea; and the Nᵊtzâr•im rejected the Hellenized Greek knock-off "gospel" as idolatrous and unacceptable!

Even the earliest extant Christian historian, Eusebius, documented (EH III.xxvii.4) that the original Jewish followers of Ribi Yᵊho•shua, the Nᵊtzâr•im, rejected all of the Hellenist (Greek) "gospels"; accepting only The Nᵊtzâr•im Hebrew Ma•titᵊyâhu as the only authoritative account of the teachings of the 1st-century C.E. Pᵊrush•i Ribi Yᵊho•shua from Nâ•tzᵊr•at and Beit Lëkhëm.

In the wake of the Hellenist Roman crushing of the Bar-Kōkh Rebellion in 135 C.E., the Romans spent the next 2 centuries destroying Tor•âh scrolls, the yo•khas•in genealogies—and every copy of Nᵊtzâr•im Hebrew Ma•titᵊyâhu. While no complete verifiable early copy of NHM survived, oral tradition in the Judaic community is what preserved Tor•âh and Ta•na"kh. This same tradition produced the Ëvën Bo•khan (EB). While EB is criticized as being redacted for polemics, corroborative and complementary fragments of the Hebrew tradition are found in other Judaic works—which Pâ•qid Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu consulted and incorporated in the Nᵊtzâr•im reconstruction of NHM.

These Hebrew source documents include Ta•lᵊmud Gᵊmâr•â (e.g. Sha•bât 116b, 5th century CE), Nestor (e.g. lines 170 and 222, 9th century CE), Seiphër Ni•tzâkh•on Yâ•shân (e.g. #157, #221, #71, and #158; 13th century CE), Ms. Or. Rome #53 (12th century CE) and the EB (codified ca 1380 CE).

The Hellenist Greek sources include the relevant papyri (e.g. 𝔓64 ca 200 CE; 𝔓86, et al.) and the and β (both early 4th century CE) along with the Latin a-3, and the later Aramaic Pᵊshi•tᵊtâ (late 4th century CE), translated from the Hellenist Greek sources.

Only in NHM is The Nᵊtzâr•im Hebrew Ma•titᵊyâhu reconstructed, by an Israeli, Orthodox Jew, Nᵊtzâr•im Pâ•qid, via direct translations from ALL known earliest extant documents: Hebrew from the 1st century C.E. through EB inclusive; consulting Greek (where Hebrew may be ambiguous) from the 1st century C.E. through the 4th-century C.E.

NHM reconstructs in English the readings of all of the earliest extant source documents of Nᵊtzâr•im Hebrew Ma•titᵊyâhu through the 4th century, and the Hebrew source documents through EB (1380 CE); with translations from Hebrew and Greek plus a separate, second volume of explanations and extensive commentary with several concordances—a total of 825 pages—for in-depth studies. This is the only uncompromisingly historical and Judaic restoration of the life and teachings of Ribi Yᵊho•shua having filtered out idolatrous Egypto-Hellenist Roman redactions—for neophytes, Christian seminarians, Judaic scholars and history professors.

There is no other work even remotely similar, which is faithful to historical—Judaic, not idolatrous Egypto-Hellenist Roman—1st century Judaism of Ribi Yᵊho•shua.

Go Top Go Back

The 1993 Covenant

Originally published the week of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in the first week of 1990.08, The 1993 Covenant clearly demonstrated — before it happened — not only the correct outcome of the Gulf War (when the popular "experts" on prophecy were predicting Armageddon was upon us) but also — more than 2 years before it happened — that the prophets of the Jewish Bible prophesied that a fateful covenant would occur in 1993!

"As in the days of Noah," most are still blissfully unaware of the 1993 covenant and its significance, 'left behind' in popular sensationalist distortions entirely alien to the ancient Jewish prophets. Get on board while you can. The ancient Judaic perspective of the Jewish prophets of the Jewish Bible is the only key that unlocks the secrets to understanding what they wrote. Injecting non-Judaic interpretations distorts the picture painted by the ancient Jewish prophets.

The 1993 Covenant restores the long-lost ancient Judaic perspectives to Jewish Bible prophecies that, outside of the Orthodox Jewish community, are universally interpreted within a Hellenist mythology context. Time has already proven Paqid Yirmeyahu correct. Don't be left out with the contra-Judaic sensationalists.

Go Top Go Back

Paqid Yaaqov "ha-Tzadiq"

Paqid Ya·aqov "ha-Tzadiq" is a reconstruction, in the style of NHM but in one volume, from which the corrupted (Hellenized) NT book "James," purportedly derived. The book comprises two sections, text and notes, and includes NT Greek => LXX Greek => MT (Masoretic Text) Hebrew with resulting reconstructed Hebrew nuances translated into English.

Published in 2005, Paqid Ya·aqov "ha-Tzadiq" is purportedly a letter
From: the first Nәtzarim Paqid, Ya·aqov "ha-Tzadiq" Ben-David, brother of Ribi Yәhoshua Ben-David,
To: the Twelve Tribes of Israel — note: the letter is not addressed to gentiles — in the Diaspora, more specifically, apparently addressing the aristocratic wealthy class of Hellenist-assimilated Sadducees.

Go Top Go Back

The Unveiling

(Revelation / Apocalypse)

Written in a beginners-friendly style, The Unveiling demonstrates how even the top Christian seminarians and evangelists — heirs of the Hellenist gentile Romans — are estranged and alien from the authentic teachings of Ribi Yәhoshua in his first century community of Hebrew- and Aramaic-speaking, Middle-eastern, Pharisee Jews.

Revelation (Greek αποκαλυψις / "Apocalypse") refers to the Hebrew (ha-hitgalut; the unveiling) of a scroll by unrolling it to read the text. Melted wax seals were often rolled into the scroll. On cooling, the wax stuck the scroll together at that point, a seal. When unrolling the scroll to read it, it couldn't be unrolled beyond the seal without breaking the seal. Thus, the next section couldn't be viewed, or read, without breaking the seal. The Unveiling claims as its author a first-century religious Jew, Yokhânân "Bën-Rogez" ("the Irascible") Bar-Zavdi·eil, who depended for his visions upon Yәkhëzqeil, Dâni·eil and the other Prophets of the Jewish Bible.

All of the innumerable Christian speculators, finding ancient Judaism entirely alien to them, have viewed Apocalypse — written by a first century Jew — through "un-Judaic," and therefore grossly distorted, lenses. Predictably, the resulting "prophecies" they describe would be unrecognizable and alien to Yokhânân "Bën-Rogez" Bar-Zavdi·eil. The key to identifying 666 and the other symbols has remained hidden from "un-Judaic" eyes, in first century Judaism. The Unveiling positively identifies — in "Revelation for Dummies" language anyone can understand — 666, the Antichrist, the Dragon, the Beast out of the Sea, the Beast out of the Land, the False Prophet, his Icon and the Mark. Further, it explains Armageddon, the Tribulation and the Rapture — as the first-century Jewish author understood them! This information is available nowhere else.

In ancient tradition, still continued by Jews today, a scroll is covered by a cloth, or veil. To read the scroll, it first had to be unveiled. To seal a scroll, hot wax was rolled into the scroll. Thus, a scroll could be sealed in several places. Each seal prevented further unrolling of the scroll until that seal was broken.

Ignorant of first century Judaism, traditional interpretations are oblivious to the perspective of the original author who was purportedly a first-century Pharisee Jew, NOT a Hellenist gentile Roman. Non-Jewish interpretations are mired in post-135 C.E. gentile Roman Hellenist syncretisms that support misojudaic Christian displacement theology. Since the first century, The Unveiling is the only translation and explanation of "Revelation" by an Orthodox Jew in good standing who understands its essential — first-century Judaic — context, in ways not possible before the discovery of Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT.

Live Link Examples:

Go Top Go Back

The Mirrored Sphinxes, Overview

Archeologists and vulcanologists continue to converge on circa B.C.E. 1467 as the approximate year of two world-shaking events: the greatest volcanic eruption in human history, at Thera (also called Santorini), and the Exodus. Effects of the former can explain all of the miracles of the latter. What is miraculous about a miracle is its timing, designed into a perfect system by an Intelligent Creator from the creation, not supernatural magic that contradicts the perfect laws of the Perfect Creator – implying that the Creator is self-contradicting. It defies reason to suggest that such a convergence, which explains the miracles, was an irrelevant coincidence. (This doesn't imply predestination. It merely constrains free will within limits in the same way as the law of gravity and the other laws of physics. You cannot fall up simply because, in your free will, you decide to. Yet, few would consider gravity or the other laws of physics as contradicting free will.)

Dating the Exodus, therefore, to B.C.E. 1467 places the birth of Moses (which, in Egyptian, means "incarnate"), 80 years earlier – in the reign of Pharaoh Amun-hotep I (B.C.E. 1548-1528), several generations before "Ramses" (corrupted from Ra-Moses, Ra-incarnate). Having been found among the reeds of the Nile by the Egyptian Princess, Moses was brought up in her household, the household of her father – the future Tuth-Moses I. Being raised in the royal household of Tuth-Moses, sharing the name Moses with the royal household cannot be coincidence. Thus, though the Bible never acknowledges Moses' Egyptian first name – as we would expect in such case, a Hebrew boy adopted into the royal household of Tuth-Moses would assume the honorific surname. Moses simply means, "incarnate," and the Jewish tradition prohibits uttering the name of pagan gods, including Tuth. Hence, Tuth-Moses, when applied to the son of Amram Ben-Qehat and Yokheved, would have eliminated the pagan name, Tuth, shortening the name to Moses, with no Egyptian first name.

Archeologists remained baffled why, a few decades later, Tuth-Moses III, successor to his mother who had been the only Queen-Pharaoh in the history of Egypt, waited 18 years after she voluntarily stepped down from the throne, before furiously erasing her, along with her daughter and Sen-en-Mut, from Egypt's history. No other pharaoh was deliberately erased from Egyptian history. Egyptologists report that both her rise to power and her exercise of power were backed by a mysterious lover named Sen-en-Mut, who was born of unknown, non-Pharaonic parents. (In those days, pharaohs practiced incest to keep royal blood in the family, literally.) There is no Egyptian record of what happened to this Queen-Pharaoh, her daughter or Sen-en-Mut. There is no evidence that their bodies were ever in their tombs. Interestingly, 18 years after the Queen-Pharaoh relinquished her throne and retired into the background is also the approximate date of the Exodus. What could have angered Pharaoh Tuth-Moses III enough to erase his mother, the Queen-Pharaoh, from Egyptian history? The historical accounts mesh with the Bible.

Live-Link Technology

Our new Live-Link Technology digital-format ebooks, in addition to enabling us to provide them to you far more cheaply, significantly updates our old, earth-shaking, soft-cover books that we've published since the early 1970s–that have forever altered the course of all three "Abrahamic religions" toward the shared reality of documented history, applied science and logic overriding traditional myths.

Now, you can read Nᵊtzâr•im ebooks in your iPad, Kindle, computer browser and even your smartphone; instantly down-loadable, directly from Israel. Reading on-line, our new ebook Live-Link Technology automatically displays continually-updated definitions that allow you to pick up the vocabulary by hovering your cursor over blue-background words and phrases to view explanatory pop-up balloons and check for the latest scientific and archeological details via our Live-Link Technology as your read, delivering real-time archeological and scientific discoveries and analysis. No other books can update themselves continually to deliver real-time information to you.

Here is a balloon note. Hover the cursor over the blue background term and an explanatory balloon displays. These are in addition to the usual links that you may click on, like Bᵊn•ei-akh. When things get a bit complicated, these are sometimes combined to provide even more in-depth information: (note the blue or gold font link to click for a Live-Link Technology, current glossary definition and hover the cursor over blue-background term for the balloon note too).

It's physically impossible for physical books to explain in the ground-breaking, multi-layered depth presented by Live-Link Technology. | (WAN) return to WAN text | (ABNC) return to ABNC text | (1993 Covenant) return to 1993 text | (Mirrored Sphinxes) return to Mirrored Sphinxes text |

Rainbow Rule © 1996-present by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David,
Rainbow Rule
Go Top Home (Netzarim Logo) Go Back

Nᵊtzâr•im… Authentic