of 135 C.E. in Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim Successor-Poseur to ἐπίσκοπος Μαρκος of 135 C.E. in Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim Successor-Poseur to ἐπίσκοπος Μαρκος of 135 C.E. in Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim |
| Pâ•qidꞋ Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋu |
"Eusebius also recorded that it wasn't until several decades after the gentile Hellenist Romans had ousted and displaced the 15th Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ Pâ•qidꞋ in 135 C.E.
" (Fabricated)2005.04.20 — Historians, including Christian historians, recognize that the first 9 alleged popes of Rome (including "St. Peter", the ossuary of the real person having been discovered by archeologists on Har ha-Zeit•imꞋ in Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim – not Rome), who supposedly pre-dated the first gentile ἐπίσκοπος Μαρκος of 135 C.E. in Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim, are a fiction fabricated only after 135 C.E. by Hegesippus (see, inter alia, Smith & Wace, “A Dictionary of Christian Biography,” IV.416 and Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋu Bën-Dâ•widꞋ, Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN), p. 24 note).
Eusebius documents that it was ἐπίσκοπος Μαρκος of 135 C.E. in Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim, who usurped the 15th Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ Pâ•qidꞋ (Yᵊhud•âhꞋ) consequent to the Roman quashing of the Bar-KōkhꞋvâ Rebellion in 135 C.E. and the accompanying exile of Jews — including Pâ•qidꞋ Yᵊhud•âhꞋ ha-Tza•diqꞋ — from Yᵊru•shâ•laꞋyim.
How should Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ and other Orthodox Jews, as well as scholars and other intelligent individuals, respond to the historically-challenged media and masses?
It’s naïve and unrealistic to attribute a make-over to a poseur’s doctrines and convictions upon being named pope. While he’ll likely try to present Christian doctrines in a PR-sophisticated way to appeal as much as possible to everyone, his convictions will remain unchanged. At the base, therefore, his decisions will continue to reflect his basic convictions.
This will contribute clarity at the expense of compromise with relativism. This is a welcome change. Relativism is an irrational contradiction of real-world documentation and history based on a silly attempt to link relativism of religious beliefs to Einstein’s theory of relativity. There is, of course, no connection between religious relativism and Einstein’s theory. Defying real-world history to justify religious relativism is, by definition, irrational.
At the same time, Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ and other Orthodox Jews, as well as scholars and other intelligent individuals, must keep perspective. This is a continuation of a fraudulent Roman usurper and poseur of the Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ Pâ•qidꞋ.
 |
|
 |