Home (Netzarim Logo)

Chronology Of The Tanakh,
From The "Big נְטִיָּה"
Live-Link

14C Moses Model

TOC (table of contents) Updated: 2023.10.17 (language cBCE 2900) © 1994- current update Yi•rᵊmᵊyãhꞋu Bën-Dã•widꞋ

This chronology used the computer to weave together the dates and chronology of Ta•na"khꞋ, pegged wherever scholars have reached a consensus on astronomical, volcanological, geological, historical or archaeological dates. All other dates are then calculated, and updated, from the scientific data and updated with the latest research.

"High" Scientific Dating vs "Low" Archeology / Egyptology Dating

There is a gap conundrum, in places diverging by nearly 2 centuries, between scientific "High" dating and archeological, including Egyptological, "Low" dating. It's unlikely this gap will be resolved any time soon. Consequently, this chronology is likely to remain a work in progress, where some numbers contradict others, for the foreseeable future. However, it isn't until one lays out an internally consistent chronology that the gap(s) become(s) conspicuous. Archeologists / Egyptologists rely on a single, unreliable Egyptian source who recorded lists of Egyptian Par•ohꞋs, Manetho (ca. B.C.E. 3rd century – give or take a century or so; which these misojudaics consider more authoritative than Scriptures of "the Jews"), and try to hide their contradictions and inconsistencies by avoiding inconvenient connections with scientific datings, Consequently, the ancient world painted by archeologists and Egyptologists with arts degrees differs from real world history as demonstrated by scientists. Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating 

Table of Contents (TOC) Quick Links
3 Sects: Osin, Hellenist-Tz'doqim & P'rushimEnosh Ben-SheitSh'khem
10 Tribes: Syria Deracination Of Yis'raeilEsteirSh'lomoh Ben-Dawid, Melekh Yis'raeil
70 C.E.EvangelizingTorah made capital offenseSh'mueil Ben-Eilqanah, ha-Navi
135 C.E.Ez'ra ha-SopheirΚαλλίστη Eruption
1260 Days (Daniyeil 12.7)Gad Ben-YaaqovShabat
1290 Days Covenant (Daniyeil 12.11)Galut BavelShabat made capital offense
1335 Days Covenant (Daniyeil 12.12)Gam'liyeilShalum Ben-Yaveish. Melekh Yis'raeil
Gentile Church Displaces N'tzarim PaqidShamai
Adam & KhauahHamanShaul Ben-Qish ha-Melekh
Aelia CapitolinaHammurabiSheim, Kham & Yaphet Ben-Noakh
Aharon Ben-YaaqovHavel Ben-AdamShiloh
Akhaz Ben-Yotam, Melekh Y'hudahHebrew, Earliest WritingShim'shon Ben-Manoakh
Akhav Ben-Am'ri, Melekh Yis'raeilHellenizationShimon Ben-Yaaqov
Akhaz'yahu Ben-Akhav, Melekh Yis'raeilHerod Sr., "the Great" (Ben-Edom/Esau) bornShir ha-Shirim
AkkadianHerod Sr., "the Great" (Ben-Edom/Esau) diedShopheit 01 (At'niel)
Alexander "the Great"HileilShopheit 02 (Eihud)
Amatz'yahu Ben-Yoash, Melekh Yis'raeilHosheia Ben-Eilah, Melekh Yis'raeilShopheit 03 (Sham'gar)
Am'ri, Melekh Yis'raeil in Tir'tzahShom'ronHosheia ha-NaviShopheit 04 (D'vorah)
Amon Ben-M'nasheh, Melekh Y'hudahIy-ZevelShopheit 05 (Gid'on)
Amos ha-NaviJews/N'tzarim expelled fm Y'rushalayimShopheit 06 (Avi-melekh)
Ananias, High PriestJulius CaesarShopheit 07 (Tola)
Antiochus 3rd, "the Great" (Syria)K'dar'laomerShopheit 08 (Yair)
Antiochus 4th Epiphanes (Syria)Khajai ha-NaviShopheit 09 (Yiph'takh)
AqeidahKhanokh Ben-YaredShopheit 10 (Iv'tzan)
Aron ha-B'rit (1 =Shiloh)KhanukahShopheit 11 (Eilon)
Aron ha-B'rit (2 Givah)Khash'monayimShopheit 12 (Av'don)
Aron י‑‑ה (3 Ash'dod)KhasidimShopheit 13 (Shim'shon)
Aron י‑‑ה (4 Eq'ron)Khavaquq ha-NaviSicarii
Aron י‑‑ה (5 Beit Shemesh)Khiz'qiyahu Ben-Akhaz. Melekh Y'hudah Stone Age
Aron י‑‑ה (6 Qir'yat Y'arim)Koresh Sr., 'the Media-Persian' (Iranian)Συνέδριον, P'rushim Win Majority
Asa Ben-Aviyah, Melekh Y'hudahKoresh Jr., "the Great"Tamar
Asheir Ben-YaaqovLeiah Bat-LavanTel el-Amarna Letters
Aviyah Ben-R'khav'am, Melekh Y'hudahLeiwi Ben-YaaqovTempest Stela
Avram Ben-TerakhLXXTemple (2nd) Temple of Jupiter
Azar'yah Ben-Amatz'yahu, Melekh Y'hudahM'gidoTemple (2nd), Hellenized
Ba'asa Ben-Akhiyah, Melekh Yis'raeilM'nakheim Ben-Gadi, Melekh Yis'raeilTemple (2nd), plundered, burned
Balaq Ben-Tzipor, Melekh MoavM'nasheh Ben-Khiz'qiyah, Melekh Y'hudahTerakh Ben-Nakhor
Bar-Kokhva RebellionM'tushelakh Ben-KhanokhTorah Given
Beit Miq'dash (1st) BegunM'tzadahTorah made capital offense
Beit Miq'dash (1st) CompletedMabulTz'doqim (Sadducees), original founding
Beit Miq'dash (1st) PlunderedMakabimTz'doqim-P'rushim Split
Beit Miq'dash (2nd) StartedMalakhi ha-NaviTz'doqim, Hellenization
Beit Miq'dash (2nd) CompletedMatan'yah Ben-Yoshiyahu, Melekh Y'hudahTz'doqim, Osin Flee TempleQumran
Bilam Ben-B'orMikhah ha-NaviTz'phanyah Ben-Kushi ha-Navi
Bil'hahMishkan built & erectedTzid'qiyahu (Matan'yah Ben-Yoshiyahu)
Binyamin Ben-YaaqovMoreih ha-TzedeqY'hoakhaz Ben-Yeihu, Melekh Yis'raeil
Boaz Ben-Sal'maMosheh Ben-Am'ram, bornY'hoakhaz Ben-Yoshiyahu, Melekh Y'hudah
Boethus, Hellenist High PriestN'khemyah Ben-Khakhal'yahY'hoash Ben-Akhaz'yahu, Melekh Y'hudah
Bronze AgeN'tzarim Extirpated by Roman ChristiansY'horam Ben-Akhav, Melekh Yis'raeil
Capital, Y'hudah (1st: Khev'ron)Nabu-khad-netzar, king of Bavel (Iraq)Y'horam Ben-Y'hoshaphat, Melekh Y'hudah
Capital, Yis'raeil (1st: Giv'ah)Nadav Ben-Yarav'am, Melekh Yis'raeilY'hoshaphat Ben-Asa, Melekh Y'hudah
Capital, Yis'raeil (2nd: Y'rushalayim)Nakhum ha-NaviY'hoshua Ben-Shimon Jr. ha-Kohein
Capital, Yis'raeil (3rd: Sh'khem)Naph'tali Ben-YaaqovY'hoshua Ben-Y'hotzadaq (Ben-S'rayah)
Capital, Yis'raeil (4th: Tir'tzah)New Testament, First Compiled Y'hoshua Bin-Nun
Capital, Yis'raeil (5th: Shom'ron)Noakh Ben-LemekhY'hoshua, Ribi (Ben-Yoseiph Ben-Dawid)
Capital punishment endedOvadyah ha-NaviY'hoshua, Ribi: s'mikhah fm Nasi Gam'liyeil
Christianity & Church, Birth: 1st Gentile PopeP'qakhyah Ben-M'nakheim, Melekh Yis'raeilY'hotzadaq Ben-S'rayah, Kohein ha-Gadol
CleopatraP'rushim (Pharisees), 1st RabbisY'hoyakhin Ben-Y'hoyaqim Melekh Y'hudah
Codex Damascus (CD)P'rushim-Tz'doqim SplitY'hudah Becomes State
Concubine 12 PiecesPaqid Yaaqov, ha-Tzadiq (N'tzarim)Y'hudah Ben-Yaaqov
Conjunctions of Saturn and Jupiter (BCE 7)Paroh Yah-kheper ka-Ra Tut-moses Sr.Y'khez'qeil ha-Navi
Dan Ben-YaaqovParoh Amun-hotep Sr.Y'khonyah Ben-Shimon Jr. ha-Kohein
DaniyeilParoh Khat-shepset (Queen) bornY'rikho
Dawid Ben-Yishai, bornParoh Khat-shepset (Queen) reignsY'shayahu Ben-Amotz ha-Navi
Dawid Ben-Yishai, vs Gal'yatParoh-Queen Khat-shepset diesY'shayahu Deutero? ha-Navi
Dawid Ben-Yishai, Melekh Y'hudah Paroh Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rdY'tziah
Dawid Ben-Yishai, Melekh Yis'raeilParoh Meren-Ptah StelaYaaqov Ben-Yitz'khaq
Day 1Paroh Ra-moses Jr. "the Great"Yaaqov Ben-Yoseiph Ben-David
Day 2Paroh Yãh-moses Sr.Yarav'am Ben-N'vat, Melekh Yis'raeil
Day 3Peqakh Ben-R'mal'yahu, Melekh Yis'raeilYarav'am Ben-Yoash, Melekh Yis'raeil
Day 4Pi-Ra-moses (orig. Pi-Tom)Yav'neh
Day 5Pi-TomYeihu Ben-Y'hoshaphat, Melekh Yis'raeil
Day 6Pontificate (B.C.E. 48)Yirm'yahu Ben-Khil'qiyahu ha-Navi
Decree to rebuild walls of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyimPriest (High), Syrian-appointedYis'raeil
Detestable Appallment (by Antiochus 4th)Priest (High), Roman-appointedYis'raeil (Yaaqov) Ben-Yitz'khaq ⇒ Mitz'rayim
Dinah Bat-YaaqovPriesthood, Abandons Torah (Hellenized)Yis'raeil Y'hudah Split
Djanet (Tanis; orig. Pi-Tom)Priesthood, Bought Annually from RomansYisakhar Ben-Yaaqov
Edom (Eisau Ben-Yitz'khaq)Priesthood, Not Aharon descendantYishai Ben-Oveid
Eilah Ben-Ba'asa, Melekh Yis'raeilPyramidsYitz'khaq Ben-Avraham
Eiliyahu ha-NaviQayin Ben-AdamYoash Ben-Y'hoakhaz, Melekh Yis'raeil
Eisau Ben-Yitz'khaqQueen Atal'yahu Bat-Am'ri, Mal'kat Y'hudahYoeil Ben-P'tueil ha-Navi
Eiver Ben-ShelakhR'khav'am Ben-Shlomoh, Melekh Y'hudahYonah Ben-Amitai, ha-Navi
El'yaqim Ben-Yoshiyahu, Melekh Y'hudahRabbis, 1st original foundingYoseiph Ben-Yaaqov
Elisha Ben-Shaphat ha-NaviRakheil Bat-LavanYoshiyahu Ben-Amon, Melekh Y'hudah
R'uvein Ben-YaaqovYotam Ben-Azar'yahu, Melekh Y'hudah
Rosetta StoneZ'kharyah Ben-Berekhyah Ben-Ido ha-Navi
RutZ'khar'yahu Ben-Yarav'am, Melekh Yis'raeil
Z'ruBavel Ben-Sh'al'tieil
Z'vulun Ben-Yaaqov
Zil'pah
Zim'ri, Melekh Yis'raeil
Rainbow Rule

Year(s)Description
cBCE 13.8 billion

Yom Ri•shonꞋ (י‑‑ה created light, separated light from darkness). "Big Stretch-Apart" – not yet a sun nor earth (nor humans) to begin marking time. Light and darkness result from the "Big Stretch-Apart", emanating from an "infinitely small point"—the scientific euphemism that misdirects the masses to focus infinitely on "the infinitely small" so that they'll never notice that the scientists are peddling "Poof! Nothing caused nothingness to transform into physical energy-matter, self-creating the universe!" (Eureka~ Roll eyes Then they have the audacity, after hawking that childish laugher wrapped in mathematical camouflage, to criticize acknowledgment of a Singularity-Creator as not intellectual!)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 4.5 billion

Earth forms in orbit around the sunTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 4.45 billion

Yom Shein•iꞋ (created sky, separated clouds from seas, moisture in atmosphere separates from surface waters). Moon

Moon forms and stabilizes earth. Scientists theorize that collisions with meteors and small planets gave the earth an initial rotation. A significant nearby planet collided with earth, accelerating earth's spin and, cumulatively, resolving to today's 24-hour rotation and day. This "Giant Impact" collision produced fragments, captured in various orbits around earth, that would coalesce over eons to become our moon and stabilize the variation of the Earth's rotational axis.

In contrast to today's current distance to the moon—about 60 Earth radii (240,000 miles / 386,000 km), scientists theorize that, initially, the moon orbited at an approximate distance of about 3-5 Earth radii (15,000 miles / 24,000 km) from the center of the Earth. Thus the moon was much closer to the earth when it formed, [looming frighteningly] more than 10 times larger in the sky than it does today. "Were it not for the moon, the influence of the giant planets in our system would cause Earth's obliquity – the angle between the Earth's equator and the plane of its orbit, whose current value is 23.5 degrees – to vary wildly with values as extreme as 0 to 80 degrees. Such variation would probably cause extreme climatic changes that would render the planet uninhabitable. Thus having a large moon may be one of the key characteristics necessary for a habitable Earth-like planet" (ibid.). This proximity would certainly have produced cataclysmic tides in earth's magma-oceans, unimaginable winds in earth's toxic atmosphere and an uninhabitable earth.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3.8 billion

Yom Shᵊlish•iꞋ: vegetation: first organisms, fungus; evidence of lifeTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3.6 billion

Yom Rᵊviy•iꞋ: moon stabilizes in near-present orbit; life begins to diversify as appointed seasons, day and night are regulated by the sun & moon.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3 billion

Paleoproterozoic Era Photosynthesizing organisms begin producing O2. Siderian Period – During the Siderian period, scientists believe that early anaerobic animal life first enabled oxygenation of the earth's atmosphere, part of the continuing process of creating the sky and its separation from the clouds and seas.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 800 million

First multicellular organisms emergeTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 650 million

Earth's core began as a molten liquid. In combination with earth's rotation, the core creates our magnetic field (somewhat like a magneto). At about this time, the core began to solidify (). As parts solidified, centrifugal force attracted the solid parts to one side of the molten mass, causing a lop-sided weight distribution. This, in turn, caused earth's polar rotation to fluctuate, producing temporary multi-polar magnetic fields until the core fully solidified, allowing earth's rotational axis to restabilize with the corresponding return to a new dipolar magnetic field that was little different from today. Earth's dipolar magnetic field extends a strong magnetic force out into space, deflecting harmful high-energy particles from the sun and the cosmos, shielding our atmosphere. Without it, our planet would be bombarded by cosmic radiation, and life on earth's surface might not exist.

Proterozoic Eon, Neoproterozoic Era, Ediacaran Period TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 485 million

Yom Kha•mish•iꞋ: fish & birds. Paleozoic Era/​Devonian Period, Ordovician Period, Mesozoic Era, Triassic & Jurassic Periods (dinosaurs evolve and go extinct)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 238 million

Dinosaurs appear.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 93 million

Yom Shish•iꞋ, mammals begin to emerge and diversifyTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 66 million

Non-avian DINOSAURS GO EXTINCT; avian dinosaurs (i.e. birds) survive.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 5.333 million

Pleiocene Epoch c BCE 5.333–2.58 million years BT TOC (table of contents)

c BCE 3.65 million

Earliest human ancestors (South Africa) lived 3.67 million years ago.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2.6 million

Paleolithic AgeTOC (table of contents)

cBCE >2 million

Earliest human ancestors colonized East Asia over two million years ago University of ExeterTOC (table of contents)

cBCE <2 million

Sha•bãtꞋ – in which ël•oh•imꞋ shã•vatꞋ (ceased, desisted, rested) from all His work of creating, and blessed and made Sha•bãtꞋ holy.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1 million

Earliest extant archaeological evidence of hominis fire-usage—near modern Kheiphâh Israel  TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 400k

First Levantine "ÕdãmꞋ," making knives and other tools and cooking meat, emerges from QësꞋëm Cave, near Tël •vivꞋ, Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ.

In Biblical epochs, this Sha•bãtꞋ, the human epoch, continues today. You and I are living in this continuing Sha•bãtꞋ (blink of an eye in geological terms, not even a nanosecond to י‑‑ה). That has implications relative to tᵊphil•otꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 185k

Modern humans appear in Carmel Cave (historic Israel) between 177,000-194,000 ago. "The Middle East was a major corridor for hominin migrations, occupied at different times by both modern humans and Neanderthals."TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 108k

Most Recent Glacial Period BeginsTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 39k

Transition between Neanderthals and modern humans, expansion of travel, first arrived in Europe c BCE 48k-26k. "Dating from this same time we unearthed a bead made from mammal bone. This is the oldest portable art object of its type found anywhere in central Europe and provides evidence of social signalling, quite possibly used as a necklace to mark the identity of the wearer."

Infusion of Aurignacians, hybrid of Neanderthals and modern humans, from Europe into the Levant.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 10k

Begin Neolithic Period – ca. B.C.E. 12,000 – 8,000, hunter-gatherers in Levant and Iran develop ranching and farming technolo­gies, the inspiration for the story of QaꞋyin and HãꞋvël with an unknown number of intervening generations lost in the oral recitations of genealogies and family lore. Evolution from nomadic hunter-gatherers to homesteading rancher-farmers leads to cooperative specialization and urbanization, growing the first town-cities, and resulting city-kingdoms of the Levant, Turkey & Kengir (Mesopotamia).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 9900

End of Most Recent Glacial PeriodTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 7000

Neolithic מוֹצָא (Mōtz•ãꞋ), located by a suburb of modern W. Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim. Earliest extant limestone ritual mask is used by shaman-priests (or tribal leaders) in the hills of Kᵊna•anꞋ; believing the mask, representing their god, supernaturally imbued its wearer with the Divine Authority of their god as the "Angel" Spokesman, speaking, through the mask (unchanging, eternal face of their god), the Divine Word of their god. Ordinarily (without mask), shaman speaks. Mask-on, the Angel of god speaks.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 6500

Chalcolithic (Copper Era of Stone) Age in the Levant – infusion, into the indigenous agricultural peoples of the Levant, of waves of immigrations from Turkey and Iran. TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 5500relative anchor

The Ma•bulꞋ. At the age of 600 (lunar years; i.e., months; i.e., 50 solar years) of age, NōꞋakh reinterprets and incorporates the Ma•bulꞋ into family written lore (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 7.6,11).

Two geologists from Columbia University, William Ryan and Walter Pitman, documented the geological evidence of a great flood in the area of Turkey that occurred a couple of millennia earlier, ca. BCE 5500 following extensive glacial melts that caused the Mediterranean (Aegean) Sea to burst through what had been a tongue of dry land forming a land bridge connecting Asia and Europe (today the Dardanelles strait, the Sea of Marmara and Bosporus strait) into the Black Sea.

Since the earliest extant sources of the Gilgamesh Flood also date from NōꞋakh's era, it's likely that NōꞋakh became associated with the Ma•bulꞋ because it was he who first stripped the account of its idolatrous foreign interpretations popular in surrounding cultures, reinterpreting the Ma•bulꞋ with proto-Tor•ãhꞋ compatible interpretations, and then incorporated the result into family written lore of the history of creation and the development of humankind. It's unclear whether, in reinterpreting-out idolatrous themes, he may have substituted his own family as example characters or whether the main characters were confused with his family by scribes at some later time.TOC (table of contents)

Exactly 0000hrs
BCE 3760.06.14

Rabbinic Poof! Creation of the earth. Rabbis deny the existence of anything before exactly 0000 hrs 00 seconds of 14th day of 6thmonth (Babylonian "Elul") of the year 0 on the rabbinic calendar. Roll eyes TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3400

Egyptian hieroglyph writing has been 14C dated to cBCE 3400-3200, predating Sumerian cuneiform by perhaps a couple of centuries.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3300Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)

End Neolithic Age (Stone Age)

Begin Bronze AgeTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3278Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

ÕdãmꞋ & Khau•ãhꞋBiblical Lifespans 

Beginnings of family oral-lore history, probably highlighted only the more accomplished personalities, omitting an unknown number of lesser-accomplished members. This implies many irrecoverable lacunae between the early Biblical personalities. It can be no more than a guess today as to how to space the Biblical characters back in time to connect with the scientific "Adam" and "Eve." Rather than abandon the scientific model to make such guesses, I have stayed with the scientific estimates of ancient mean lifespans and leave it to the reader to guess which Biblical characters should be spaced back, and how, to match up with scientific "Adam" and "Eve."

ÕdãmꞋ lived to age 930; probably lunar years (= months), yielding 77½ solar years.Biblical Lifespans (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 5.5).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3219Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)relative anchor

QaꞋyin born – firstborn of ÕdãmꞋ and Khau•ãhꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3160Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)relative anchor

HãꞋvël bornTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3101Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Sheit born. Sheit dies at 912. This is likely lunar years (=months), 76 solar years. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 3100 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom, 1st Dynasty, c BCE 3100-2901

Narmer/​Hor-Aha (Menes) consolidates and founds Egypt; becoming Egypt's First King-Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 3042Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Ë•nōshꞋ born. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2983Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Qei•nãnꞋ born. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2924Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Mᵊhu•yã•eilꞋ born. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2900Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom, 2nd Dynasty, c BCE 2900-2726

Earliest extant Sumerian cuneiform, via Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ the origin of the Semite dialect and the proto-Sinai Hebrew alephbeit (cBCE 2900).

Greek form of first Egyptian Par•ohꞋ of the 2nd Dynasty: Hotep-sekhem-ui: ("reconciled are the 2 mistresses" i.e. Upper & Lower Egypt; commonly Hotepsekhemwy).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2865Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Yã•rëdꞋ born. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2806Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Kha•nōkhꞋ born. Walks with ël•oh•imꞋ at age 365. If this describes his death, and is stated in lunar years (i.e. months), then Kha•nōkhꞋ only lived to be about 31½ years old (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 5.22-24). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2747Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Mᵊtu•shë•lakhꞋ born.

Mᵊtu•shë•lakhꞋ dies at age 969 (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 5.27). This is expressed in lunar years (i.e., months). Still, Mᵊtu•shë•lakhꞋ lived until almost 81 years old. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2725 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom, 3rd Dynasty, c BCE 2725-2629

Kha-sekhem-wy becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2688Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

LëmꞋëkh born. (LëmꞋëkh died at 777; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 5.31. This is likely stated in lunar years (i.e., months), equating to almost 65 years old.) Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2661 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom, 3rd Dynasty, c BCE 2725-2629

Djoser becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2648 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom, 3rd Dynasty, c BCE 2725-2629

Sekhem-khet becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2629Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)relative estimate

NōꞋakh born when LëmꞋëkh was 182. In an era in which boys took on the responsibilities of manhood at age 12-13, this probably equates to lunar years (= months), making LëmꞋëkh just over 15 years old when he became the father of NōꞋakhBiblical Lifespans 

While no geological evidence of a great flood has so far been found to corroborate any great flood during this era, it can be no mere coincidence that this is the era in which the Akkadian and Babylonian (Gilgamesh) oral lore of the Flood are also first codified, c BCE 21st century.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2628 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty

Sneferu becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2605 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty

Khufu ("Cheop"), builder of the Great Pyramid, becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2583 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty

Djedefra becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2570, 2568, 2566Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty relative estimate

Sheim, Khãm and Yã•phëtꞋ born beginning when NōꞋakh was 500. This is likely still stated in lunar years (i.e., months) equating to almost 42 years old when he fathered his firstborn son (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 5.32).

Sheim dies at 602 (lunar years = just over 50 solar years old; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.11). Biblical LifespanTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2569 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty

Khafra becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2554 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty

Menkaura becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2529 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty

Shepseskaf becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2511 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 5th Dynasty

Userkaf becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2511Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 5th Dynasty relative estimate

Arᵊpa•khᵊshadꞋ born. Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2504 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 5th Dynasty

Sahura becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2472 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 5th Dynasty

Djedkara becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2452Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Shë•lakhꞋ born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.12). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2424 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 5th Dynasty

Unas becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2393Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

EiꞋvër born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.14). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2392 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 6th Dynasty

Teti becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2369 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 6th Dynasty

Userkara becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2356 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 6th Dynasty

Pepy Sr becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2339 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt Old Kingdom 6th Dynasty

Merenra becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2334Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

PëlꞋëg born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.16). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2300Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  Sargon Sr. founds Akkadian dynasty that would become Bã•vëlꞋ, BCE 24th century Akkadian dynasty dominated area for 200 years. [Hist./Arch. dating]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2278 Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251)Egypt 7th Dynasty - 1st Intermediate Period

Egyptian 7th Dynasty-1st Intermediate Period.

cBCE 2275Levant: Early=Proto-Syrian Bronze Age (EBA-all), c BCE 3300-2251) relative estimate

Rᵊu born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.18). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2250Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)

Intermediate Bronze Age / Middle Bronze 1 (Israel & Southern Levant)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2216Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976) relative estimate

Sᵊrug born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.20). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2157Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976) relative estimate

Nã•khōrꞋ born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.22). Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2104 Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 11th Dynasty

Mentu-hotep Jr. becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 2098Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976) relative estimate

TërꞋakh born (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.24); died at age ≈65 (i.e., family patriarch = numerological 100 + "40 years" + 65 = 205) Transitional calendric conundrums  (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.32) Biblical Lifespans TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2039Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)relative anchor

Av•rãmꞋ (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 11.26-7) born.Transitional calendric conundrums 

Applying the transitional calendric method of intercalation to Av•rãmꞋ's age upon leaving Khã•rãnꞋ, he may have been only ≈35 (numerological "40 years" + 35 = 75).

Extending this method consistently, Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ was then ≈45 (+ numerological "40 years" = 85) when he married Hã•gãrꞋ, having dwelled in Kᵊna•anꞋ ≈10 years (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 16.3) and ≈46 (numerological "40 years" + 46 = 86) when Yi•shᵊm•ã•eilꞋ was born to Hã•gãrꞋ (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 16.16).

This suggests that Av•rãmꞋ was circumcised, becoming Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ, at age ≈49 (numerological "40 years" + 49 = 99; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 17.1, 24). This seems to have been in reaction to the episode in which Lōt left Sᵊdōm, immediately preceding its destruction.

There is probably insufficient data to ever completely decipher all of these proper ages with confidence. Biblical Lifespans  TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 2015 Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 11th Dynasty

Mentu-hotep 3 becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1986 Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 11th Dynasty

Mentu-hotep 4 becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1980Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)relative anchor

Yi•tzᵊkhãqꞋ born, making Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ a family patriarch; i.e., numerological age 100  (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 21.5).

A•qeid•ãhꞋYi•tzᵊkhãqꞋ age 12; Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ was age ≈37 (numerological patriarch 100 years + 37 = 137; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 17.17).

SârꞋâh is purported by the rabbis to have died upon hearing about the A•qeid•ãhꞋ, at age age ≈27 (numerological matriarch 100 years + 27 = 127; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 23.1)

At numerological "40 years" old, Yi•tzᵊkhãqꞋ marries RiꞋvᵊq•ãh (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 25.20).

Yi•tzᵊkhãqꞋ died at age ≈80 (patriarch 100 + 80=180; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 35.28). Biblical Lifespans  TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1978 Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Amun-em-hat Sr. becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1976Israel & Southern Levant: Intermediate Bronze Age (IB / MB1, c BCE 2250–1976)

End Intermediate Bronze Age /​ Middle Bronze Age 1TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1961 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Sen-Usret Sr. becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1925 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Amun-em-hat Jr becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1921Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Twins Ei•sauꞋ (Ë•dōmꞋ) and Ya•a•qovꞋ (Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ) born when Yi•tzᵊkhãqꞋ was ≈20 ('40 years' + 20 = 60; bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 25.26). Calendric Transitions 

Rainbow Rule

Ya•a•qovꞋ fled from his twin brother, Ei•sauꞋ, to the home of his uncle Lã•vãnꞋ in Khã•rãnꞋ, A•rãmꞋ (where they appear to still have been using the lunar calendar) to find a wife. Attracted to Rã•kheilꞋ, he worked 14 (lunar years) = months—just over 1 solar year—to marry her, being duped into marrying her sister, LeiꞋãh, first (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 32:24-32). Calendric Transitions  (Otherwise, if Rã•kheilꞋ was, say 20, when Ya•a•qovꞋ was first attracted to her, she would have been middle-aged—34, unreasonably beyond marriageable age of that time—when they finally married.) While his age is not stated, he was likely still in his teens.

Rainbow Rule

Ya•a•qovꞋ becomes Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ upon leaving Lã•vãnꞋ another 6 (lunar) years = 6 mos. later (c BCE 1890).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1886 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Sen-Usret Jr. becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1866 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Sen-Usret 3 becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1862Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Rᵊu•veinꞋ born to LeiꞋãh (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 29.32).

Before Rᵊu•veinꞋ, there is no reliable dating of generations other than an estimated 60 years apparent average per generation – likely numerological values 40 plus 20 having no correlation to solar (or lunar) years.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1843 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Amun-em-hat 3 becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1803Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Shi•mᵊōnꞋ born to LeiꞋãh when Ya•a•qovꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1803 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Amun-em-hat 4 becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1802Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Dãn born to Bi•lᵊh•ãhꞋ (Rã•kheilꞋ's attendant)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1801Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Lei•wiꞋ born to LeiꞋãh

Lei•wiꞋ died at 67 in the darkness (+ 70 years" of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim = 137; Shᵊm•otꞋ 6.16).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1800Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Na•phᵊtalꞋi born to Bi•lᵊh•ãhꞋ (Rã•kheilꞋ's attendant)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1799Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

YᵊhudꞋãh born to LeiꞋãhTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1798Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

God born to Zi•lᵊp•ãhꞋ (LeiꞋãh's attendant)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1797Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Yi•sã•khãrꞋ born to LeiꞋãhTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1796Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

ÕsheirꞋ born to Zi•lᵊp•ãhꞋ (LeiꞋãh's attendant)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1795Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Zᵊvul•unꞋ born to LeiꞋãhTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1793Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Din•ãhꞋ born to LeiꞋãhTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1792Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Yo•seiphꞋ born to Rã•kheilꞋ (30.23-25).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1792Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)

Hammurabi, an Amorite, reigns over Bã•vëlꞋ, inscribes his "Code of Hammurabi" Stela (in Louvre Museum, Paris); BCE 1792-1749. Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1790Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761) relative estimate

Bin•yã•minꞋ born to Rã•kheilꞋ (35.16-20)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1776 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Queen Sobek-neferu becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1775Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Yo•seiphꞋ, age 17, sold to their cousin, Yi•shᵊm•ã•eil•imꞋ, slavers who sell him in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim (37.2)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1772 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Wegaf becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1770 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt Middle Kingdom, 12th Dynasty

Sobek-hotep Jr. becomes Par•ohꞋ.

cBCE 1764Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Qᵊhãt born, middle son of Lei•wiꞋ. Ergo, about (35 at birth of older brother Gershom + 2 =) 37 years after birth of Lei•wiꞋ. Like his father, he died at 63 in the darkness (+ "70 years" of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim = 133 yrs).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1762Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)relative anchor

Yo•seiphꞋ vizier/viceroy over Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim, age 30, during 7 yrs of plenty (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 41.46)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1761 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2a (MBIIA / MBI, c BCE 1975–1761)Egypt 2 Intermed 13th-16th, Abydos & 17th Dynasty

Second Intermediate Period: 13th-16th Dynasties, Abydos Rule & 17th Dynasty. (Successions uncertain due to paucity of evidence.).

cBCE 1755Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651) relative estimate

Yo•seiphꞋ, estimated age 37, brings Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ to Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim, beginning 430 yr absence from Kᵊna•anꞋ, 2 yrs into the 7 yrs of famine (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 45.11).

Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ joins Yo•seiphꞋ in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim reportedly at age 130. Although this is an age different from intercalations in either A•rãmꞋ or Kᵊna•anꞋ; yet it was obvious (and not questioned in awe) not only by Hebrews, but also by the Egyptian Par•ohꞋ Calendric Transitions  (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 47.9) in 2nd year of famine (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 45.6; Shᵊm•otꞋ 12.40-41).

While it is tempting to assess this as the numerological age 60 (Sirius 70 + 60 =130), this would dictate that Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ went to Egypt c BCE (1811-60=) 1751 whereas a different line of computations indicates he arrived in Egypt at age 130 (i.e. 122 years), 62 years later, in c BCE 1689. This suggests an early attempt by scribes to reconcile (rather than conceal and ignore) various lines of computation.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1740Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651)relative anchor

Pã•rëtzꞋ is born to Tã•mãrꞋ by YᵊhudꞋãh (be-Reishit 38.1-30).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1726Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651) relative estimate

AmᵊrãmꞋ, grandson of Lei•wiꞋ, was 1st of 4 sons born of Qᵊhãt.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1708Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651) relative estimate

A•ha•ronꞋ born 123 years before 40th year after Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ (bᵊ-Mi•dᵊbarꞋ 38.33), three years before Mosh•ëhꞋ (Shᵊm•otꞋ 7.7).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1696Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  Yo•seiphꞋ, age 30, out of jail, 7 years of plenty begin (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 41.46): 1 yr in PōꞋti PhërꞋa's house + 12 yrs. in jail [calc. fm Yo•seiphꞋ’s birth]; Par•ohꞋ En-yoteph 4th names En-yoteph-o-ker (Egyptian name equating to Yo•seiphꞋ in Hebrew) vizier/viceroy (an indication suggesting that the rule of Par•ohꞋ En-yoteph 4th extended to Lower–northern–Egypt, including the Delta) with the new name: צָפְנַת-פַּנְעֵחַ (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 41.45)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1682Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651) relative estimate

Yo•seiphꞋ died still in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim at age 110 (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 50.26) and was mummified. In the ongoing transition of his time, from the lunar calendar to our current solar year calendar, 110 is plausible as a real age as we think of it today. But 110 does stretch credulity a little while his life story seems to scream out something far more significant: Yo•seiphꞋ spent most of his life in the darkness of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim—which would be symbolized as "70 year" period. And the last thing we hear from him is that Yo•seiphꞋ was oriented to the time, after an unknown period subsequent to his death that his mummy would be returned to Kᵊna•anꞋ—where the numerological equivalent of an "uncertain period" = '40 years'! Stated alternatively, Yo•seiphꞋ looked toward "70 years" + '40 years' = 110 years as his final number of days!!! If this is the case, then we are given no indication at all of his physical age at death. So, we'll assume 75 actual solar years.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1681Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651)relative anchor

Khë•tzᵊr•ōnꞋ born to Pã•rëtzꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1672Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651)relative estimate: 17 yrs after moving to Egypt

Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ dies in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim after living there 17 years, at age 77 (Sirius 70 + 77 = 147; Calendric Transitions  bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 47.28; 50.22,26).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1655Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651)

Par•ohꞋ Sa-hotep-ka-Ra En-yoteph 4th rules in Egypt (indefinite reign, est. 10 yrs)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651) Egypt 2nd  Intermediate Period, 17th Dynasty

to c BCE Par•ohꞋ Sen-akht-en- Yah-moses ("Ahmose 0", great-grandfather of "Ahmose 1") – likely candidate royal Pharaonic household into which, several decades before his reign began, one of his princess daughters (Yah-hotep Sr., Yah-hotep In-Hãp or Sit-Djehuty) adopted Moses, who, thereby, would have become the adopted brother of Se-qen-en- Tao – a prime candidate to have been the Par•ohꞋ of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1622Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)relative anchor

Rãm born to Khë•tzᵊr•ōnꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)Egypt 2nd  Intermediate Period, 17th Dynasty

to c BCE Par•ohꞋ Se-qen-en- Tao reigned in Waset (Thebes/​Luxor, Upper Egypt) – best known for his revanchism against the KhëqᵊqãwꞋ KhãsꞋᵊt (Hyksos).

cBCE 1608Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)

Estimated birth of Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun: 110 earlier than his estimated date of death at 110 years (based on estimated years leading Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ after the death of Mōsh•ëhꞋ).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)Egypt 2nd  Intermediate Period, 17th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Ka-moses, of uncertain lineage (only speculated to be son of Seqen-en-Ra Tao), reigned in Waset (Thebes).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2b (MBIIB / MBII; c BCE 1760-1651)relative anchor

Mosh•ëhꞋ born to AmᵊrãmꞋ (Dᵊvãr•imꞋ 34.7; 3 years after A•ha•ronꞋ and 80 (numerology: 2 generations assigned 40 "years" each) before Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ (Shᵊm•otꞋ 7.7). Found in basket of bulrushes floating down the Nile by 12-year-old royal princess-in-waiting [Khãt-shepꞋset?], who thereby self-identified herself with IꞋsis, and the infant she found with HōrꞋus, whom she named: [first name Sen-en-Mut???] Tut-moses.

Thus, Mosh•ëhꞋ was adopted into the royal Pharaonic House of Par•ohꞋ ???-mosesTOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty
Egyptian New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses. By end of the first decade of his reign, he laid siege on Avaris. Years of battles ensued with insurrections springing-up in already-liberated areas and being quelled; victory between 12th & 15th year of his reign. Then he fought Cush. In Pharaonic tradition of keeping "royal blood" in the family, Par•ohꞋ Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses married his sister, Yãh-moses Nefer-tiri, who became Egypt's first great God's wife of Amun.

He had two daughters, either of whom could have been the princess in Shᵊm•ōtꞋ 2.5: Princess Yãh-moses Merit-Amun & Princess Yãh-moses Sit-Amun.

Yãh-moses-ankh was Par•ohꞋ Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses's heir apparent, but he died sometime between Par•ohꞋ Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses's 22nd regnal year. Perhaps his firstborn son was killed in battle, or…?

Another of his sons was Amun-hotep Sr.

Plagues ("tempest") Stela
Tempest Stela of Ah-moses
Click to enlargePlagues Stela

Probably in concert with his inauguration, recording the cataclysmic chain of events that may have begun with his great-grandfather, eventually bringing about a New Kingdom and sweeping him to the throne, Par•ohꞋ Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses commissioned what has come to be known as "The Tempest Stela" – which recorded catastrophic weather phenomena that affected the whole of Egypt.

Currently, researchers fight off anti-Bible agendists, on one side, while, on the other side, simultaneously struggling ineffectually to squeeze the 14C-dated Καλλίστη Eruption into the same time frame with this stela that seems to describe that very eruption but names its sponsor as Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses (i.e. 14C-dated c. BCE 1570) – 55 years later!!!TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1551Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)

Yãh-moses-ankh, firstborn son of Par•ohꞋ Neb-pehty-Ra Yãh-moses dies in the 17th-22nd regnal year of Yãh-moses Sr.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)anchored date

14C Dating of Καλλίστη Eruption
Καλλίστη/​Thera/​Santorini/​Minoan/​Atlantis eruption.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  Par•ohꞋ enslaves the Ha•birꞋu (Hebrews) in corvée to build him a new capital city, named Pi-Tōm (which Ra-moses Jr. "the Great" renovated, renaming the city after himself – as well as marking Egypt's theological evolution from A•tōmꞋ to Ra-moses: Pi Ra-moses).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)
Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ
On the Judaic Calendar:

(Adopted Hebrew) Pharaonic Prince □-Moses, at 80 (numerology = 2 x 40 years) years of age, calls on Par•ohꞋ to release Hebrews (Shᵊm•otꞋ 7.7).

cBCE Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Amun-hotep Sr., son of Yãh-moses, becomes Par•ohꞋ. Because his son died in infancy, Amun-hotep Sr. was succeeded by his top general brother-in-law, Yah-kheper ka-Ra (later throne name Tut-moses Sr.), who had married his sister.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1542 Israel & Southern Levant: Middle Bronze Age 2c (MBIIC = MBIII ca. BCE 1650–1516)

Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun destroys Yᵊri•khoꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1536East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative anchor

Begin: Late Bronze Age Collapse / Greek Dark Age
Am•i•nã•dãvꞋ born to RãmTOC (table of contents)

cBCE  East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE Yah-kheper ka-Ra, Tut-moses Sr. becomes Par•ohꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1515East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)

Birth of Pharaonic Princess Khãt-shepꞋset, daughter of Yah-kheper ka-Ra Tut-moses Sr. (The end of her reign, i.e. her death, is 14C- dated. Dental exam of her mummy indicates that she died at age ≈65 ► calculated from the 14C date.)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1512East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)

A•ha•ronꞋ died age 123. Succeeded by Ëlᵊã•zãrꞋ as Kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dōlꞋ, who served for 20 years.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1505East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)  relative estimate

Episode, during the tenure of Ëlᵊã•zãrꞋ as Kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dōlꞋ, of Bil•ãmꞋ & Bã•lãqꞋ in Mo•ãvꞋ (modern Jordan, across the river east of Yᵊri•khoꞋ).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE Par•ohꞋ Tut-moses Jr. (married to royal princess Khãt-shepꞋset, daughter of Yah-kheper ka-Ra Tut-moses Sr.) TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt 2nd  Intermediate Period, 17th Dynastyrelative anchor

Estimated death of Mōsh•ëhꞋ (age 80 at the time of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ) and succeeded by Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun.

Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun takes command after Mosh•ëhꞋ dies at age 120 (numerology = 3 x 40 years), interpolating from both Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ and from building of Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ begun in 4th regnal year of ShᵊlomꞋoh ha-MëlꞋëkh (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 6.1; Dᵊvãr•imꞋ 34.7); the 14C dating of his destruction of Yᵊri•khoꞋ; Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun later erected the Mi•shᵊkãnꞋ at ShilōhꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE . Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rd may be the Par•ohꞋ who took vengeance against the foundling god of Khãt-shepꞋset, Mosh•ëhꞋ ( Sen-en-Mut), and against Mosh•ëhꞋ’s kindred the Hebrews. About 20 years after Khãt-shepꞋset died, her monuments were defaced, and a wide-ranging attempt was made to erase her memory from Egypt's history. expunging the embarrassing catastrophe of Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rd’s reign, of the Hebrew □-Moses, and most of the references to Ha•birꞋu, from their archives. From BCE 15th to the 12th centuries the ᵊpru appear in Egyptian documents as captives from Kᵊna•anꞋ-Syria, and as slaves of the state.”TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE Regency of Khãt-shepꞋset for infant or minor nephew Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rd, who co-reigns as a child with his aunt, Khãt-shepꞋset.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE Co-reign of Queen-Par•ohꞋ Khãt-shepꞋset with limited (probably ceremonial) input from youth minor Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rd.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Sole reign of Queen Par•ohꞋ Khat-shepset. The aunt of Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rd, the Royal Princess Khãt-shepꞋset, with the aid of her lover, Sen-en-Mut Tut-moses, became Queen Par•ohꞋ and reigned until her 14C-dated death.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1492East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative anchor: Yehoshua takes command -20 yrs

Enslaved to mëlꞋëkh A•rãmꞋ, 8 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3.8); Bᵊn•eiꞋ-Yi•sᵊrã•eilꞋ followed their own eyes for approx. 13 years prior to the first sho•pheitꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1483East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative anchor

Estimated date that Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun dies at age 110 (numerology = "70 years" of darkness spent in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim + "40 years"; Yᵊho•shuꞋa 24.29); Bᵊn•eiꞋ-Yᵊho•shuꞋa do whatever is right in their own eyes (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 17.6); body of a Lei•wiꞋ’s concubine, who was abused to death in Giv•ãhꞋ by the Tribe of Bin•yã•minꞋ, cut in 12 pieces (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 19); A•ronꞋ ha-Bᵊrit in Giv•ãhꞋ, Pi•nᵊkhasꞋ Bën-Ëlᵊã•zãrꞋ Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ officiated (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 20.27-28; Yᵊho•shuꞋa 24.33).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1479East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)  relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Sho•pheitꞋ #1: A•tᵊni•eilꞋ Bën-Qᵊnaz (younger brother of Kã•leivꞋ, Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3.9), 40 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3.11) [calc. fm Yᵊho•shuꞋa's death, estimating 13 yrs. in which Bᵊn•eiꞋ-Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ followed after their own eyes]; enslaved to Ë•gᵊl•ōnꞋ, mëlꞋëkh Mo•ãvꞋ, 18 years concurrent with Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ [interpolated from Yᵊhoshua and Sho•pheitꞋ #1 ]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1476 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)

battlesite Battle of MᵊgidꞋō. Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  In the 23rd year of his reign, Men-kheper Ra Tut-moses 3rd defeats a Levantine coalition at the Battle of MᵊgidꞋō)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Death of Queen Par•ohꞋ Khat-shepset. Dental indications of her mummy suggest that she died at age ≈60.

cBCE 1452East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative anchor: 1st day of 1st month of 2nd year after Yᵊtziah

Mi•shᵊkãnꞋ completed 02.01.01 (on the Judaic calendar) of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ (Shᵊm•ōtꞋ 40.17)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1450East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative anchor

Na•khᵊsh•ōnꞋ born to Am•i•nã•dãvꞋ [calc. as average # yrs/generation from birth of Pã•rëtzꞋ to birth of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE Amun-hotep Jr. reigns.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1441East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)  relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Sho•pheitꞋ #2: Ei•hudꞋ Bën-GeirꞋã (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3.15) 80 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3.30).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Tut-moses 4th reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1401East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Amun-hotep 3rd reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim. He wrote clay tablets, taken by his son, Amun-hotep 4th / Akhen-Aten to Akhet-Aten (later renamed: Tël el-Amarna), Egypt, which make frequent mention of incursions by Ha•birꞋu against the settled [regions of Kᵊna•anꞋ].TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1377 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Amun-hotep 4thAkhen-Aten – reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim. He moves the capital from Thebes to Tël el-Amarna, marries Queen Nefer-titi and establishes the pattern of making changes de convenance to Tōr•ãhꞋ, thereby displacing Tōr•ãhꞋ with a similar-looking counterfeit – inventing the pattern-jig from which, millennia later, Paul and Muhammed would form their respective displacement mythologies. He established a solarcentric monotheism, featuring sun(day)-worship.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1366East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)  relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Sho•pheitꞋ #3: Sha•mᵊgarꞋ Bën-A•nãtꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3.31) 20 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 4.3) [calc. fm Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ + 212; not from uncertain duration of Sho•pheitꞋ #2 who officiated "80 yrs".]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1364East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative anchor

Sa•lᵊm•ãꞋ born to Na•khᵊsh•ōnꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1351 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Nefer-neferu-Aten (popularly Nefer-titi) reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1348East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Sho•pheitꞋ #4: Dᵊvōr•ãhꞋ ha-Nᵊvi•yãhꞋ EishꞋët La•pid•ōtꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 4.4) 40 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 5.31) [calc. fm Sho•pheitꞋ #3 who officiated 20 yrs.]; story of Yã•eilꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 4.17ff)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1342 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Tut-Ankh-Amun (popularly "Tutenkamen," "King Tut") reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1337 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ai reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Hōr-em-heb reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses Sr. reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1310East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Enslaved to Mi•dᵊyânꞋ 7 years, partially concurrent (?) with feckless Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 6.1) made tunnels in hills of YᵊhudꞋãhTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1304East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Sho•pheitꞋ #5: Gi•dᵊōnꞋ Bën-Yō•ãshꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 6.11) officiated 40 years (8.28)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Set-i Sr. reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.

Later in his reign, Seti conquered parts of Kᵊna•anꞋ. In Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 3 (under Ei•hudꞋ Bën-GeirꞋã, Sho•pheitꞋ #2), this appears to be a rather lengthy period, of uncertain duration, in which a combination of foreign (e.g., Egypt, Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ, Ë•dōmꞋ, Assyria, Aram) and an assortment of remaining local Kᵊna•an•imꞋ kings raid and mount forays into Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ (e.g., the MëlꞋëkh Mo•ãvꞋ). These, likely, were allies of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim whose victories Par•ohꞋ credited to himself.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

to c BCE : Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses Jr. "the Great" reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim, built Luxor and El-Karnak and renovated Pi-Tōm, renaming the city after himself and the evolution of A•tōmꞋ to Ra-moses: namely, the city of Pi Ra-moses (later Avaris, modern Qantir).

Theologians misinterpret Shᵊm•ōtꞋ 1.11 – in which the scribe, copying a ms. centuries after the fact, identifies the ancient city name along with the city's then-current name (in the same way I refer to Kengir (Mesopotamia) as Iraq, Persia as Iran or Constantinople as Istanbul so that readers of my era can relate) – as "proof" that the city was built by Ra-moses Jr. "the Great" (and, therefore, of his later time; see also bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 47.11). As a result of their misinterpetation, Ra-moses Jr. "the Great" is routinely wrongly assumed to be the Par•ohꞋ of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ – which happened 2½ centuries before Ra-moses "the Great"!!!TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1278East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative anchor

BōꞋaz, great-grandfather of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh, born to Sa•lᵊm•ãꞋ [calc. as average # yrs/generation from birth of Pã•rëtzꞋ to birth of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1266East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Sho•pheitꞋ #6: Av•imëlꞋëkh Bën-Yᵊrubba•alꞋ, mëlꞋëkh in ShᵊkhëmꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 9.1) 3 years (9.22)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1264East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Sho•pheitꞋ #7 & #8 (concurrent): Tō•lã Bën-Pu•ãhꞋ (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 10.1) 23 years and Yã•irꞋ ha-Gi•lᵊãdꞋi 22 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 10.3).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1260East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)  relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Enslaved to Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ and bᵊn•eiꞋ-A•mōnꞋ [modern Amman, western Jordan] during last 18 years of Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ #7 & #8 (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 10.7-8)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1251 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Mer-en-Ptah reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.

"… and in [Kᵊna•anꞋ] itself the Egyptian occupational levels were replaced by those of the Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ, the Sea People group which Ra-moses Jr. "the Great" had employed as mercenaries in Egypt and [Kᵊna•anꞋ] after he had defeated them."TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1249 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)

Estimated date of Rut and BōꞋaz; a false parallel is sometimes asserted between Rut 1 and Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 10. The רָעָב of Rut 1.1 contrasted against no רָעָב mentioned in Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ; but, rather צָרָה of Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 10.9-16, c BCE 1316 [calc. ⅔ from birth of BōꞋaz to birth of Ō•veidꞋ since BōꞋaz mentioned to Rut that he was old]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1243East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Sho•pheitꞋ #9: Yi•phᵊtakhꞋ ha-Gi•lãd•iꞋ 6 yrs (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 11.1, 12.7) in RãmãtꞋ ha-Mi•tzᵊp•ëhꞋ near Ma•khan•ãꞋyim, in the province of Gi•lãdꞋ, midway between Yãm Ki•nërꞋët and Yãm ha-MëlꞋakh, 11 mi. east of NᵊharꞋ ha-Ya•rᵊd•einꞋ in modern-day Jordan,13 mi. north of the Yã•bōqꞋ river; Pi•nᵊkhãsꞋ Bën-Ël•ã•zãrꞋ Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ “stood” in Beit Eil in the province of Ë•phᵊr•aꞋyim (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 20.26-28)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1238East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Sho•pheitꞋ #10: IvᵊtzãnꞋ of Beit LëkhꞋëm 7 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 12.8-9)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1232East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Sho•pheitꞋ #11: Eil•ōn of the tribe of Zᵊvul•unꞋ 10 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 12.11)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1231 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

Meren-Ptah reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.

The ruling Par•ohꞋ inscribed a Victory Stela speaks of Meren-Ptah’s victory over Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋEgyptian documentation of the existence of Israel!!!

"An inscription of [Ra-moses Jr.'s] successor, Meren-Ptah, which mentions the name Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ for the first time in an Egyptian text and definitely places it somewhere in [Kᵊna•anꞋ], has been taken as evidence that the biblical [Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ] had already taken place."TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1223East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Sho•pheitꞋ #12: Avᵊd•ōnꞋ Bën- Hi•leilꞋ 8 yrs (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 12.13-15)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1216East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age) relative estimate (includes uncertain '40 yrs')

Sho•pheitꞋ #13: Shi•mᵊsh•ōnꞋ Bën-Mã•nōꞋakh [corrupted to “Samson”] 20 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 15.20; 16.31)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1213 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Amun-moses reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1207 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Set-i Jr. reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1206East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)relative estimate

Enslaved to Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ 40 years (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ 13.1) while Eil•iꞋ ha-kō•heinꞋ raises: Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ.

The A•ronꞋ י‑‑ה is brought from where Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bin-Nun originally placed it, in Shil•ōhꞋ, to -ËvꞋën -EiꞋzër to fight the Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ; but, instead, Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ captured the A•ronꞋ י‑‑ה (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 4.1-18) and took it to AshᵊdōdꞋ where they developed עְֳפָלִים (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 5.1-6), so they sent it off to Ëqᵊr•ōnꞋ (5.10), who then developed עְֳפָלִים. After 7 months, the exasperated and terror-stricken Pᵊli•shᵊt•inꞋ put it on a cart, tied with a rope to two driverless milk cows that had never been yoked, which pulled it to the field of Yᵊho•shuꞋa in Beit ShëmꞋësh (6.13-14). Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ + 416 (Sho•pheitꞋ 13-20) [calc. fm Sho•pheitꞋ #13 who officiated 20 yrs]TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1202 East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Sa-Ptah reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1200East Mediterranean Basin & Levant: Late Bronze Age Collapse (LBAC Greek Dark Age, cBCE 1536–1200 Iron Age)

End: Late Bronze Age Collapse—in Kᵊna•anꞋ
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 Greek Dark Age Continues to cBCE 750 (Pūlossian, Phoenician, Minoan, Philistine, et al.)
cBCE 1200 lead tablet from Har Æ•vãlꞋ corroborates curse in Dᵊvãr•imꞋ 27. TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1199
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Iron Age (in Kᵊna•anꞋ)
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1196
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty

Queen-Par•ohꞋ Ta-Wosret reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1192
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Set-nakht reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1192
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)relative anchor

Ō•veidꞋ, father of Yi•shaiꞋ and grandfather of Dã•widꞋ (birth of Dã•widꞋ; calc. as average # yrs/generation from birth of Pã•rëtzꞋ to birth of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1190
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 3 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1173
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 4 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1167
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yi•shaiꞋ, father of Dã•widꞋ, born [calc. as average # yrs/generation from birth of Pã•rëtzꞋ to birth of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh].
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1161
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

A•ronꞋ י‑‑ה fetched to house of Av•iꞋnã•dãvꞋ in Qi•rᵊy•atꞋ Yᵊãr•imꞋ, where it remained for 20 years (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 7.2)

Ëlᵊã•zãrꞋ Bën-Av•iꞋnã•dãvꞋ officiates (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 7.1), during the days of Yi•shaiꞋ and the elder brothers of Dã•widꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1154
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 5 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1149
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 6 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1143
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 7 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1142
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) anchored date

Birth of Dã•widꞋ, 7th son of Yi•shaiꞋ (Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ ÂlꞋëph 2.13-15), [calc. fm Dã•widꞋ’s coronation estimated at 23 yrs of age].
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1136
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 8 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1134
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ anoints Shã•ūlꞋ Bën-Qish MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ, establishes capital at Gi•vᵊãhꞋ (modern, Gi•vᵊatꞋ-Shã•ulꞋ 5km north of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 10.1); dies (age not given) at Gi•lᵊbōꞋa (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 31.4-5).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1131
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 9 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1130
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ mã•shakhꞋ Dã•widꞋ (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 16.3) MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh in Khë•vᵊr•onꞋ at 22 years of age [became king of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ at 30]; reigned 7 years 6 mos.; Shᵊmu•eilꞋ Beit 2.4, 11).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1129
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

battlesite Battle of ÆꞋmëq -Æl•ãhꞋ; Dã•widꞋ & Gã•lᵊyãtꞋ when Dã•widꞋ still a נַעַר, Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 17.33).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1123
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

battlesite Battle of Har Ji•lᵊbōꞋa; Πύλος-tines v (Northern) Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ; kill Shã•ūlꞋ Bën-Qish, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1120
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 10 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1114
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

General AvᵊneirꞋ ("father of an oil-lampliight") anoints Prince Ish-BōꞋshët (né Æsh BaꞋal ) Bën-Shã•ulꞋ MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ (Shëm•ū•eilꞋ Beit 2.8-9), who reigns only 2 years.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1112
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty relative anchor

Dã•widꞋ Bën Yi•shaiꞋ MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim as capital 33 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 2.11; Shᵊmu•eilꞋ Beit 5.4) = total 40 years; Dã•widꞋ 30 years old when made king (Shᵊmu•eilꞋ Beit 5.4)

Hebrew Language (In Contrast To Alephbeit) First Documented

"A breakthrough in the research of the Hebrew scriptures has shed new light on the period in which the Bible was written. Prof. Gershon Galil of the Department of Biblical Studies at the University of Haifa has deciphered an inscription [of the Qeiyafa Ostracon] dating from…the period of King David’s reign, and has shown that this is a Hebrew inscription. The discovery makes this the earliest known Hebrew writing, which derived from the Sumerian language of Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ.

Sumerian cuneiform is the origin of the Semite dialect, and the proto-Sinai Hebrew alephbeit. They are one unbroken line of language evolution—dating back to cBCE 2900, and roughly the same period as Egyptian hieroglyphs! These are preceded by the "proto-literate period", pictographs of hunting grounds and the like preceding more complex written communications.

" When archeologists say "BCE 10th century namely reign of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh," they fail to realize that the two are assumed, to be the same; the reign of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh is assumed to have been in the BCE 10th century. They are not necessarily identical. The ostracon is dated to the reign of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh – whenever that is demonstrated to have been. Though the language is demonstrably Hebrew, it's written in an alphabet that pre-dates Phoenician, from which the Hebrew alephbet later developed.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1107
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 20th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses 11 reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1087
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt 3rd Intermediate Period-23rd Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Nes-ba-neb-Djed (Hellenized to Smendes) reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1080
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor 40yrs
Kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dōlꞋ Tzã•dōqꞋ Bën-Akh•iy•tūvꞋ

Birth Of Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ (Bᵊn•ei Tzã•dōqꞋ)

ShᵊlōmꞋōh ha-MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ reigned in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim 40 years (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 11.42); 40 years = approx. generation, after completing Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ?
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1076
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) anchored date

Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ is begun in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim (4th year of ShᵊlomꞋoh, 7 years to build; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 6.38).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1069
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ is completed in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim (11th year of ShᵊlomꞋoh, 7 years to build; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 6.38).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1059
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt 3rd Intermediate Period-23rd Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Amun-em-nisu reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

r c BCE 1055–1029
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) anchored date

Invasion by Par•ohꞋ Hëdj-khëpër-Ra Sëtëp-ën-Ra Shë•shë•n•q (Hellenized to Psusennes Sr.; Shoshenq Sr.; Shishaq), discovered in the tomb whose wall inscriptions indicated it was the tomb of Psusennes Sr. Egyptologists estimate his reign ending at least 11 years earlier, c BCE 1047-1001. Prior to the recent (2010-11) 14C datings (which, when based on olivewood, introduce several decades of inaccuracy ) of Ramsey et al., however, the dating and length of his reign, dependant on a single guesstimate source (Manetho), is mired in numerous questions. Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating 

Dating of the invasion, by contrast, is more straightforward. 14C date of Tël RᵊkhōvꞋ Iron Age 1A-B "late eleventh-early tenth centuries for stratum D-3" (i.e., BCE 1050-950), one of the several destructions.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1043
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Yah-kheper-Ra Setep-en-Amun Pasebakhenniut Sr. – "The Silver Pharaoh" (which, in ancient Egypt of that time, was more valuable than gold); reigned to c BCE 1020.

Some time early in, or immediately preceding, his reign (i.e. c BCE 1047; Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating ), the branch of the Nile servicing Pi Ra-moses dried up. This was the city originally built by enslaved Hebrews, under the Par•ohꞋ of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ, as his new capital – Pi-Tōm. Subsequently, Ra-moses Jr. "the Great" (c BCE 1292-1252) renovated Pi-Tōm, renaming the city after himself and the evolution of A•tōmꞋ to Ra-moses: Pi Ra-moses (later renamed Avaris, modern Qantir).

Par•ohꞋ Yah-kheper-Ra Setep-en-Amun, the "Silver Pharaoh", moved the city, stone by stone, 20 km north to another, flowing, tributary of the Nile at Djanet (modern Tanis).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 
TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1040
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Death of ShᵊlōmꞋ•h ha-mëlꞋëkh [interpolated from his beginning the building of Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ of ShᵊlōmꞋōh at a young but reasonable age, pointing at an earlier dating, versus cascading the reigns of successive kings of the 10 northern tribes of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ upward from ca. BCE 722, pointing at a later dating]. The twin descriptions of "40 years" for the successive reigns of both Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh and ShᵊlōmꞋ•h ha-mëlꞋëkh suggest that a significant part of the "gap" between "High" and "Low" datings (Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating ) hit the crunch here even among the earliest extant scribes.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1040
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

RᵊkhavᵊãmꞋ Bën-ShᵊlōmꞋōh becomes mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim, (reigned 17 yrs. Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 12- 14.21) [Shlomoh's death 5 years before Shë•shë•n•q invasion [Calc. after ShᵊlomꞋoh ha-MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ reigned in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim 40 years (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃlꞋëph 11.42)].
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1040
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yã•rãvᵊãmꞋ Bën-Nᵊvãt, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in ShᵊkhëmꞋ and Pᵊnu•eilꞋ (east of Ya•rᵊd•einꞋ river on south bank of Yabōq river, eastern mound of modern Arabized Tulul al-Dhahab) 22 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 14.20), (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 11.26ff; 12.16ff; 14.20; 15.2, 9; 14.20.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1016
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Ãv•i•yãhꞋ Bën-RᵊkhavᵊãmꞋ, mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim, 3 years, (18th year of Yã•rãvᵊãmꞋ, mëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 15.1-2; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 13.1).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

BCE 1010–1002
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt 3rd Intermediate Period-23rd Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Amun-em-opet reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1007
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

ÕsãꞋ Bën-Ãv•i•yãhꞋ, mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim 41 yrs, (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 15.9-10; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 16.13).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1005
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Nã•dãvꞋ Bën-Yã•rãv•ãmꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shᵊkhëm, 2nd yr of ÕsãꞋ , for 2 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 15.25).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

r c BCE 1002–975
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) Egypt 3rd Intermediate Period-23rd Dynasty

Par•ohꞋ Osorkon Sr., "the Elder"; throne name Yah-kheper-Ra Setep-en-Ra reigns in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 1001
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Baᵊãs•ãꞋ Bën-Akh•i•yãhꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Ti•rᵊtz•ãhꞋ 3rd yr of ÕsãꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 15.28 & 33), for 24 yrs (15.33); Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 16.1, reading the 36th year of ÕsãꞋ , must be in error?
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 975
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

EilꞋãh Bën-Baᵊãs•ãꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Ti•rᵊtz•ãhꞋ (26th year of ÕsãꞋ , 2 yrs; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 16.8); assassinated by his servant and successor, Zi•mᵊr•iꞋ (father unknown).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 971
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Zi•mᵊr•iꞋ (lineage unknown, former servant and assassin of EilꞋãh Bën-Baᵊãs•ãꞋ), MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in =Ti•rᵊtz•ãhꞋ 7 DAYS (27th year of ÕsãꞋ ; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 16.9-10).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 971
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Rival factions in Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ: Õmᵊr•iꞋ  (lineage unknown, probably of the tribe of Ë•phᵊr•aꞋyim) vs Ti•vᵊn•iꞋ Bën-Gin•atꞋ (probably of the tribe of Yi•sã•khãrꞋ), contend for the throne of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Ti•rᵊtz•ãhꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 16.15, 21-22).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 969
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Õmᵊr•iꞋ prevailed as MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ beginning in the 31st regnal year of ÕsãꞋ over YᵊhūdꞋãh. After ruling 6 years in Ti•rᵊtz•ãhꞋ, Õmᵊr•iꞋ moved his capital to Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ (Herod renamed city Sabastiyeh; located ≈10 km NW of ShᵊkhëmꞋ), where he reigned for 12 years, for a total of 18 years (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 16.23). Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ remained the capital of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ until the deracination in BCE 720.

Interpreting the verse as 12 years overlapping the 6 years unbalances the two chronologies of kings, so that his reign fails to begin in the 31st regnal year of ÕsãꞋ .

Balancing the two royal chronologies (from the death of ShᵊlōmꞋōh to the deracination of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in BCE 722) also reveals that a reign of x (apparently full) years of any king usually correlates to partial intrusion into either the beginning or ending year, or both; so that the reign covers, at least partially, x+1 years.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 957
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Akh•ãvꞋ Bën-Õmᵊr•iꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ) 38th yr of ÕsãꞋ , 22 yrs. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 16.29). Reigning 22 yrs shows a clear error in the BAR dating.

Akh•ãvꞋ intermarried an idolatrous Phoenician (Lebanese) princess of Tzi•dōnꞋ, Iy-ZëvꞋël Bat ët  BaꞋal, built a mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh to BaꞋal in a temple of BaꞋal that he had built, and he made an a•shᵊr•âhꞋ.

Khi•eilꞋ, from Beit Eil, built Yᵊri•khoꞋ (16.34).

Eil•i•yãhꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ proclaimed a famine, demonstrated a barrel of meal and a cruse of oil not exhausted (17.1-16), raised a widow’s son (17.17-24), went to Akh•ãvꞋ in the 3rd year of the famine; challenged the 450 nᵊviy•eiꞋ BaꞋal (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 18). Eil•i•yãhꞋu fed by ma•lãkhꞋ; the still small voice. Passing the mantle to Ël•i•shãꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 19).

During Akh•ãvꞋ’s 2 wars with Syria (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 20), Iy-ZëvꞋël Bat ët  BaꞋal cited "eminent domain" to take a vineyard from Nãv•ōtꞋ, for which Eil•i•yãhꞋū ha-Nã•viꞋ cursed her (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 21.20ff). 3 yrs of peace with 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 was then followed by a war in which Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ (10) and YᵊhūdꞋãh allied together (Akh•ãvꞋ having given his—and his wife, Iy-ZëvꞋël Bat ët  BaꞋal's—(BaꞋal-follower) daughter, A•talᵊyãhꞋū, in marriage to Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ's son, Yᵊhō•rãmꞋ, to seal an alliance).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 953
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ Bën-ÕsãꞋ , mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh reigned 25 years (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 15.24; 22.50; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 20.31).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 933–898
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  𒀸𒋩𒆠 (Neo-Assyria) king Salᵊmãnū-Asharëd (Shalmaneser-3) 3rd (Salᵊmãnū-Asharëdū; Shalmaneser-3).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 925–908
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Eil•i•yãhꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 925–908
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

O•vad•yãhꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 923
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)
battlesite battlesite 𒀸𒋩𒆠 (Neo-Assyrian) king Salᵊmãnū-Asharëd (Shalmaneser-3) 3rd (Salᵊmãnū-Asharëdū; Shalmaneser-3). battled an alliance that included both Akh•ãvꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ and Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh, was first seriously contended at the Battle of Battle of Qa•rᵊqōrꞋ, and appears to have raged from west coastal Syria down through the Levant, concluding with the Battle of Rãm•ōtꞋ Ji•lᵊãdꞋ, in which Akh•ãvꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ was killed.

Knowing that the 𒀸𒋩𒆠 (Neo-Assyria) had sent out the order to assassinate Akh•ãvꞋ specifically (22.31), and to evade the prophecy of Mi•khã•yᵊhuꞋ Bën-Yi•mᵊl•ãhꞋ that he would be killed in that battle, Akh•ãvꞋ ha-mëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ disguised himself as an ordinary charioteer, convincing Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh to dress as Akh•ãvꞋ ha-mëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ (wickedly scheming for Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ to be killed instead).

When the 𒀸𒋩𒆠 (Neo-Assyria chased down whom they thought was Akh•ãvꞋ and discovered it wasn't him, they were disheartened. In frustration, a single 𒀸𒋩𒆠 (Neo-Assyria) (sharpshooter/sniper?) archer picked-out Akh•ãvꞋ in the fray and launched an arrow into the midst of the battling warriors of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ and YᵊhūdꞋãh. The arrow struck Akh•ãvꞋ in the gut and he bled out in the chariot. Thus, Akh•ãvꞋ died in the Battle of Rãm•ōtꞋ Ji•lᵊãdꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 922
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•rãmꞋBën-Akh•ãvꞋ MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ 5 years before Yᵊhō•rãmꞋBën-Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 8.16-17; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 21.5, 20). Yᵊhōr•ãmꞋ Bën-Akh•ãvꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Y•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ; 18th yr of Yᵊhō•shâ•phâtꞋ Bën-•sâꞋ mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh (ergo, Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 1.17 must be in error?), reigned for 12 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 3.1).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 917-​893
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  mat Ash-shur (country of the city of the god Ashshūr; i.e. Neo-Assyria) 𒀸𒋩 king Ashshūr-nãshir-apl Jr.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 915
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

A•khazᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Akh•ãvꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ (17th yr of Yᵊhō•shâ•phâtꞋ Bën-•sâꞋ mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh for 2 yrs) Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 22.52); Eil•i•yãhꞋū ha-Nã•viꞋ & fire from heavens consumes 50-soldier platoons sent by A•khazᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Akh•ãvꞋ to kill him (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 1).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 914
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•rãmꞋBën-Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ, mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (8 yrs., 5th yr of Yᵊhō•rãmꞋBën-Akh•ãvꞋ, Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 8.16-17; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 21.5, 20).

A•talᵊyãhꞋū Bat-Õmᵊr•iꞋ had been given to marry Yᵊhō•rãmꞋBën-Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ, MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh by Akh•ãvꞋ Bën-Õmᵊr•iꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ and his wife, Iy-ZëvꞋël Bat ët-BaꞋal. It is clear from their shared sordid histories that their furtive purpose, under the ruse of knitting the divided kingdoms back together, was to infuse, through their daughter, tolerance in YᵊhūdꞋãh for their BaꞋal-worship (while boosting their own security as well).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 908–835
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Ël•i•shãꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 908
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

A•khazᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Yᵊhō•rãmꞋ, mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (11th & 12th yrs of Yᵊhō•rãmꞋBën-Akh•ãvꞋ for 1 yr; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 8.25-26; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 22.2).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 907
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

YeiꞋhū Bën-Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ (Bën-Ni•mᵊsh•iꞋ), MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ 28 yrs., Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 9.14; 10.32-33, 36), dated by archaeologists, confining the calc to be no later than c BCE 855.

When YeiꞋhū Bën-Yᵊhō•shã•phãtꞋ (Bën-Ni•mᵊsh•iꞋ) assassinated A•khazᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Yᵊhō•rãmꞋ, MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh, his widowed Queen Mother, A•talᵊyãhꞋū Bat-Õmᵊr•iꞋ, wrested the throne of YᵊhūdꞋãh. When she learned that YeiꞋhū, having been anointed MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ by Ël•i•shãꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ, had also assassinated her entire family in Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ, she realized her sudden vulnerability. She then assassinated all rival royal descendants of YᵊhūdꞋãh (i.e. Beit-Dã•widꞋ)—except for a single grandson, YōꞋãsh Bën-A•khazᵊyãhꞋū, who had been rescued from his grandmother and hidden by her own daughter, the boy's aunt, princess Yᵊhō•shavᵊatꞋ Bat Yᵊhōr•ãmꞋ), sister of the deceased A•khazᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Yᵊhō•rãmꞋ, mëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh. (Her husband was Yᵊhō•yãd•ã ha-kō•heinꞋ).

Thus, A•talᵊyãhꞋū Bat-Õmᵊr•iꞋ succeeded her husband, becoming the Wicked Ma•lᵊk•atꞋ-YᵊhūdꞋãh (the only queen ever to reign in the history of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ or YᵊhūdꞋãh) for ≈6 yrs.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 901
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yō•ãshꞋ Bën-A•khazᵊyãhꞋū, MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (≈40 years, Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 22.11-12; 23.11; 24.1), began to reign in 7th yr of YeiꞋhū (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 12.1). The practice of crediting infringed yrs to both kings seems less prevalent in YᵊhūdꞋãh than in Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ during this period.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 883
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

battlesite Battle of Qa•rᵊqōrꞋ; 𒀸𒋩 king Salᵊmãnū-Asharëd (Shalmaneser-3) 3rd (Salᵊmãnū-Asharëdū; Shalmaneser-3) fought an alliance that included.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 875
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•ã•khãzꞋ Bën-YeiꞋhū, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ (dated 42 yrs later), reigned 17 yrs. cf. Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 13.1. According to this same verse, it should correspond to the 23rd regnal year of Yō•ãshꞋ Bën-A•khazᵊyãhꞋū. While the verse may have possibly been a scribal error misreading 26 (which could then be explained by infringing years versus whole years), the chronology of these two lines of kings based on literal Scripture readings is rife with arithmetic contradictions relative to archeological dating; and even more so scientific dating. (See also Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 34.8; 36.2,4.).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 854
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•ãshꞋ (also Yō•ãshꞋ) Bën-Yᵊhō•ã•khãzꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ ≈16 yrs. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 13.10; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 25.17).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 850
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Tel Dan Stele.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)
Click to enlarge
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 
Tel Dan Stele – BCE 9th century; earliest known reference to daletvavdalet tawyodbeit (Middle-Semitic Hebrew; modern: בֵּית דָּוִד) – the House of "David".
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 846
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

A•matzᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Yō•ãshꞋ (Bën-A•khazᵊyãhꞋū), MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (≈29 yrs., supposed to begin in 2nd yr. (22?) of Yō•ãshꞋ Bën-Yᵊhō•ã•khãzꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 14.1; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 25.1).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 834
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yã•rãvᵊãmꞋ Bën-Yō•ãshꞋ (Bën-Yᵊhō•ã•khãzꞋ), MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ for ≈52 yrs. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 13.13; 15.2).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 813
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

A•zarᵊyãhꞋ(ū) Bën-A•matzᵊyãhꞋū, MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim ≈52 yrs.

The account in Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 26 clearly confuses the name of the king with the name of Ū•zi•yãhꞋū ha-kō•heinꞋ. Not only is A•zarᵊyãhꞋ(ū) given in the account in Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 14.21; 15.1-2, his son and successor specifies his name as A•zarᵊyãhꞋ(ū). A priori, Ū•zi•yãhꞋū is ha-kō•heinꞋ.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 808
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Yōn•ãhꞋ Bën-A•mi•taiꞋ, ha-Nã•viꞋ; swallowed-up for 3 days in a דָּ֣ג גָּד֔וֹל  "Big Fish".
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 778
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

ZᵊkharᵊyãhꞋū Bën-Yã•rãvᵊãmꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ ≈6 mos. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.8).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 777
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Sha•lūmꞋ Bën-Yã•veishꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ ≈1 mo. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.13-14; v13 promulgates the conflation of the subsequent A•zarᵊyãhꞋ(ū) Bën-A•matzᵊyãhꞋū MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh with Ū•zi•yãhꞋū ha-kō•heinꞋ).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 776
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Mᵊna•kheimꞋ Bën-Gãd•iꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ ≈10 yrs., Pūl was king of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 for 2 years during 50th yr of A•zarᵊyãhꞋ(ū) (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.17-19).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 769
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Ho•sheiꞋa ha-Nã•viꞋ, BCE 769-698 Hist dating; familiarity of descriptions suggest he lived in the 10 Northern Tribes.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 763
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

ÂꞋmos -Nã•viꞋ, BCE 763 Hist dating.
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 763
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Pᵊqakh•yãhꞋ Bën-Mᵊna•kheimꞋ, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ, ≈2 yrs in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ. Pūl is king of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.23).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 758
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

PëꞋqakh Bën-RᵊmalᵊyãhꞋū, MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ (BCE 737-732 52nd yr of A•zarᵊyãhꞋū ha-kō•heinꞋ??? for ≈20 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.27). According to Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.29, ÕkhãzꞋ fought Ti•gᵊlat-Pilësër (BCE 744-727); PëꞋqakh fought ÕkhãzꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 16.5-10) and was deposed in 20th yr of Yō•tãmꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.30). However, Yō•tãmꞋ reigned only 16 yrs. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.33)!
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 758
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yō•tãmꞋ Bën-A•zarᵊyãhꞋu, MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.1ff; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 26.1ff); confused with Ū•zi•yãhꞋū ha-kō•heinꞋ (26.17ff; Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.7, 32-33 (reigned fm 2nd yr of PëꞋqakh, Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 16.1), for ≈16 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.33); Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 27.1,8).
Greek Dark Age Continues Until Classic Period, cBCE 750 TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 744
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  Pulu/ Ti•gᵊlat-Pilësër 3rd (dated to BCE 744-727) cf. Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 15.19-20 Hist/Arch datingTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 741
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

ÕkhãzꞋ Bën-Yō•tãmꞋ, MëlꞋëkh YᵊhudꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim fm 17th yr of PëꞋqakh for ≈16 yrs. (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 16.1-2); Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 28.1)

Ti•gᵊlat-Pilësër (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 16.7)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 734
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Hō•sheiꞋa Bën-EilꞋãh, became last MëlꞋëkh Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ in Shō•mᵊr•ōnꞋ, until the derecination; correlated to 12th yr of ÕkhãzꞋ, reigned for ≈9 yrs (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 17.1-3; 18.9)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 726
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 king Salᵊmãnū-Asharëd (Shalmaneser-5) 5th (Salᵊmãnū-Asharëdū; Shalmaneser-5). Sha•lᵊma•nᵊësꞋër 5th, BCE 726-722) cf. Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 18.10TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 722
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) anchored date

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 king Sha•lᵊma•nᵊësꞋër 5th conquered and deracinated Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ; assimilating—irreversibly eviscerating and eradicating—the 10 Northern Tribes. Since the 10 Tribes, who hadn't been a genetic race since Ei•sauꞋ, assimilated into other peoples, the 10 Tribes no longer exist and, except for those remnants who fled into YᵊhudꞋãh and are since known only as Yᵊhud•imꞋ. The 10 Northern Tribes can never be restored (Qi•dush•inꞋ 70b).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 721
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  Sargon Jr. BCE 721-705TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 720
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Yᵊsha•yahꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ (1-39 c BCE 720) Hist. dating, see also Yᵊsha•yahꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ Deutero (c BCE 540)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 719
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Khi•zᵊq•i•yãhꞋ Bën-ÕkhãzꞋ, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (29 yrs., Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 18.1-2; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 29.1); reigning in 701 (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 19.32-36)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 710
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Yoeil ha-Navi, BCE 764 dating wrong; describes aftermath of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 population transfers & extinction of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 704
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Sa•nᵊkheir•ivꞋ (Hellenized to Sennacherib) BCE 704-681TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 703
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

MikhꞋãh ha-Nã•viꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 694
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)relative anchor

Mᵊna•shëhꞋ Bën-Khi•zᵊq•i•yãhꞋ, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (55 yrs. Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 33.1).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 689
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Sa•nᵊkheir•ivꞋ (Hellenized to Sennacherib) destroys Bã•vëlꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 680
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Esarhaddon BCE 680-669TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 668
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Ashurbanipal BCE 668-627TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 640
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)relative anchor

ÕmōnꞋ Bën-Mᵊna•shëhꞋ, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (2 yrs., Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 33.21)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 631
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)relative anchor

Yō•shi•yãhꞋū Bën-ÕmōnꞋ, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (31 yrs., Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 34.1, 22; 35.25)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 630
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Tzᵊphan•yãhꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ (BCE 630-625)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 627
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Nᵊvu-apūl-ūshūr Sr (Neo-Babylonian cuneiform, Hellenized to Nabopolassar) (Nᵊvu-apūl-ūshūr), father of Nᵊvu-khadᵊnëtzꞋar, crowns self king of Akkad / Iraq / Bã•vëlꞋ, reigned from c BCE 627-07.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 623
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Yi•rᵊmᵊyãhꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ (BCE 623-585; Yi•rᵊmᵊyãhꞋu 1.2)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 618
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)relative anchor

Khi•lᵊq•i•yãhꞋu ha-kō•heinꞋ finds SeiphꞋër Tor•ãhꞋ (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 23.23-24).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 613
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Na•khumꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ, c BCE 613TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 612
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Nineveh (modern Mosul, Iraq), 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 capital, destroyed by alliance of Medes and Babylonians; Cyaxares king of Medes, BCE 612-585.TOC (table of contents)

r c BCE 609–594
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

cartouche Nekho royal prenomen Whëm-ib-Ra  Carrying-out Heart-wish of RaPar•ohꞋ Whëm-ib-Ra Nᵊkhō Jr. marched north out of hieroglyph: Tawᵊ (Land-land {2 Lands, Upper & Lower}; Hellenized by disputed means to Αἴγυπτος (Aiguptos), Anglicized to Egypt; N16 ta landx2 dual) (𐤌𐤑𐤓𐤉𐤌) and fought the Neo-Babylonians at the Battle of 𒃻𒂵𒈩 (Ka•rᵊkᵊmishꞋ), mat Ash-shur (country of the city of the god Ashshūr; i.e. Neo-Assyria).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 609
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•ã•khãzꞋ Bën-Yō•shi•yãhꞋū, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (3 mos. Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 23.31; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 36.2)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 609
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Ëlᵊyãq•imꞋ (Yᵊhō•yã•qimꞋ) Bën-Yō•shi•yãhꞋū, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (3 mos., Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 24.8; Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 36.4)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 609
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

Yᵊhō•yã•khinꞋ Bën-Yᵊhō•yã•qimꞋ, MëlꞋëkh of combined-YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (11 years, Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 24.6 Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ Beit 36.4-5; not before ca. B.C.E. 597: Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ 1.1-2); cursed, including his descendants, by Yi•rᵊmᵊyãhꞋu 22.30. TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 605
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  <s>Na•buꞋ</s> (Babylonian <s>god</s> of wisdom and writing) – khad (firstborn male) – nëtzꞋar (may you watchguard) (Na•buꞋ-khad-nëtzꞋar) Jr. (c BCE 605-562), son of Nᵊvu-apūl-ūshūr Sr (Neo-Babylonian cuneiform, Hellenized to Nabopolassar) (Nᵊvu-apūl-ūshūr, Hellenized to Nabopolassar)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 602
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Dãn•iy•eilꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 600
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Kha•va•quqꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ c BCE 600TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 599
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)relative anchor: 8 yrs before 586, cf. Artscroll Daniel, p. 175

<s>Na•buꞋ</s> (Babylonian <s>god</s> of wisdom and writing) – khad (firstborn male) – nëtzꞋar (may you watchguard) (Na•buꞋ-khad-nëtzꞋar) Jr., son of (Nᵊvu-apūl-ūshūr) the Kasdim, ascends to throne of Iraq/Bã•vëlꞋ; appoints Ma•tanᵊyãhꞋ (Tzi•dᵊq•i•yãhꞋū) Bën-Yō•shi•yãhꞋū, last MëlꞋëkh YᵊhūdꞋãh in Yᵊrū•shã•laꞋyim (11 yrs., uncle of Yᵊhō•yã•khinꞋ, Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 24.17-18).

cBCE 597
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor

<s>Na•buꞋ</s> (Babylonian <s>god</s> of wisdom and writing) – khad (firstborn male) – nëtzꞋar (may you watchguard) (Na•buꞋ-khad-nëtzꞋar) Jr. conquers Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, First Population Transfer includes Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ, who begins having visions in the 30th regnal year of Nᵊvu-apul-ushur Sr. (Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ 1.1).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 592
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor: 5th year after population transfer to Bavel
Early Summer, BCE 592: Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ's Vision Of The Kha•yãhꞋ Kha•shᵊmalꞋ, 4-Faced Kᵊruv TOC (table of contents)
cBCE 591
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) relative anchor: 5th year after population transfer to Bavel
Late Summer, BCE 591: Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ Witnesses Kã•vodꞋ י‑‑ה Departing Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ -Rish•ōnꞋ., along with the First (Minor) Babylonian Decapitation (exile of King & Court: Top Leaders of Royal Beit-Dã•widꞋ & Kō•han•imꞋ Dynasties); "Exile" applied to "Jews" is a misnomer. The Babylonians never exiled the population of Judaea.TOC (table of contents)
cBCE 590
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586)

Shᵊalᵊti•eilꞋ Bën-Yᵊhō•yã•khinꞋ; Davidic king-in-exile; prob born in Bã•vëlꞋ when father was ≈20) - prob. died in Bã•vëlꞋ c BCE 538TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 586
Iron Age (cBCE 1199–586) anchored date
Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim Falls to <s>Na•buꞋ</s> (Babylonian <s>god</s> of wisdom and writing) – khad (firstborn male) – nëtzꞋar (may you watchguard) (Na•buꞋ-khad-nëtzꞋar) Jr., Second (Main) Babylonian Decapitation "Exile" as a general description of the population of Judea (Jews) is a misnomer. The Babylonians never exiled the population of Judaea. This main transfer was only an estimated 10,000 population of Judea's top leadership aristocracy in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim—virtually the entire head of Judea's Dual-Dynasties Aristocracy: the Royal Branch (Beit-Dã•widꞋ) & the Clergy Branch (kō•han•imꞋ) aristocracy—leaving Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim in smoldered ruins. However, this left the remainder of Judea (except for a corridor from the coast to Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim) in their undamaged homes and lands. Though headless, Judea's remaining population is estimated to have been 65,000—from a total population in Judea that archaeologists estimate had previously been ≈75,000. (9th-11th yrs of Tzi•dᵊq•i•yãhꞋu, plunder of Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ -Rish•onꞋTOC (table of contents)

End Iron Age.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 584 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Begin Hellenic Era.

Astyages (Ass. Istumegu), son of Cyaxares, and last king of Media (Iraq-Iran border area), BCE 584-550TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 583 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ (writing c BCE 597-570)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 572 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)relative anchor: 5th year after population transfer to BavelEarly Spring BCE 572:Firstmonth 10, 14th year after <s>Na•buꞋ</s> (Babylonian <s>god</s> of wisdom and writing) – khad (firstborn male) – nëtzꞋar (may you watchguard) (Na•buꞋ-khad-nëtzꞋar) Jr. destroyed the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ of ShᵊlōmꞋōh Yᵊkhë•zᵊq•eilꞋ Envisions combination Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ of ZᵊrūꞋ-Bã•vëlꞋ & Beit Tᵊphil•ãhꞋTOC (table of contents)
cBCE 570 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Yᵊhō•tzã•dãqꞋ Bën-Sᵊrã•yãhꞋ, kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋ (Di•vᵊr•eiꞋ-ha-Yãm•imꞋ ÃlꞋëph 5.40-41; Khaj•aiꞋ 1.1, 12, 14; 2.2, 4; Zᵊkhar•yãhꞋ 6.11).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 561 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Nᵊvu-naid 3rd), last king of Bã•vëlꞋ (modern Iraq), understood by Qum•rãnꞋ to be Na•buꞋ-khad-nëtzꞋar Jr.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 559 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Dar'yawesh "the Iranian" Koresh Sr. (Dan. 6.1); Achaemenid king of Iran, grandson of Astyages. In BCE 550, he revolted against his grandfather, Astyages, and captured Media from him. Therefore, Koresh Jr. "the Great" cannot be the Cyaxares who was the father of Astyages, BCE 559-529TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 540 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Questionable Yᵊsha•yahꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ Deutero (chapters 40-66), c BCE 540; see also Yᵊsha•yahꞋu ha-Nã•viꞋ (c BCE 720)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 538 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

7thmonth 15, Kōrësh Jr. "the Great", Achæmenid king of Iran, captures Bã•vëlꞋ.

The son of Nᵊvu-naid acted as king during his father's absences, became prince over Iraq (Bã•vëlꞋ). Beil-ᵊsh-a•tzarꞋ is assassinated.

In Firstmonth (≈Apr.) 1, 1st yr of reign, announces permission for Yᵊhud•imꞋ (which included the ancestor of RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa and the Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ) to return to Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim and he pã•qãdꞋ (mustered, monitored) them, on his authority, to build a second Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ, sending Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Yᵊhō•tzã•dãqꞋ (Bën-Sᵊrã•yãhꞋ) and ZᵊruꞋ-Bã•vëlꞋ Bën-Shᵊalᵊti•eilꞋ. Work started on Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ ha-Shein•iꞋ, but was soon shut down by the mixed peoples 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 had, in deracinating the 10 Tribes of Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ nearly two centuries earlier, transferred from all over the Middle East into the Shōm•rōnꞋ—modern "Palestinians" (ËꞋzᵊr•ã 4; Zᵊkhar•yãhꞋ 3 & 6.11; with ËꞋzᵊr•ã 1.1 & 7.9).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 528 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Cambyses-Dar'yawesh, son of Koresh Jr. "the Great", king of Persia (modern Iran), ca B.C.E 528-​523.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 522 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Dar'yawesh Hystaspes, king of Iran and grandson of Koresh Jr. "the Great", succeeded Cambyses the son of Koresh Jr. "the Great", BCE 522-486TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 520 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Khaj•aiꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 519 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Zᵊkhar•yãhꞋ Bën-Bë•rëkh•yãhꞋ Bën-Id•oꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 516 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ ha-Shein•iꞋ completed (Adar 3)???, 6th regnal year of Dar'yawesh (ËꞋzᵊr•ã 6.15)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 500 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Compilation of Shir ha-Shir•imꞋ, some of which likely date back to c BCE 800TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 486 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Akhashveirosh, Xerxes Sr., son of Dar'yawesh, king of Iran, father of Dar'yawesh Nothus, "the Mede" of Dan. 9.1. "Xerxes settled down to a life of self-indulgence, reflected in the account of Ahaseurus in the Book of "Esteir," BCE 486-465 (c BCE 470 Hã•mãnꞋ)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 465 H1Ar Archaic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461)

Artakhshast-Artaxerxes Sr. becomes king of Iran. Beginning with his decree to build (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 586-c 461) the walls of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, c BCE 453, Samaritans lobby him to change mind; c BCE 452-425 ËꞋzᵊr•ã 6 [or Artaxerxes Jr., below?] and Nᵊkhëm•yãhꞋ Bën-Kha•kha•lᵊyãhꞋ probably of the tribe of YᵊhudꞋãh) appointed governor of YᵊhudꞋãh, reference to "Darius the Persian" (12.22) likely refers to Dar'yawesh Nothus (see below), BCE 465-425TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 453 H2Cl Classic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 460-337)anchored date

Decree by Artakhshast-Artaxerxes Sr. to rebuild the walls of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 449 H2Cl Classic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 460-337)

Ma•lãkh•iꞋ ha-Nã•viꞋ, c BCE 500-398, c BCE 450TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 442 H2Cl Classic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 460-337)

Dar'yawesh Nothus, king of Iran 442-404 BCE, BCE 442-404TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 409-​359 H2Cl Classic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 460-337)

ËꞋzᵊr•ãTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 404 H2Cl Classic (Pre-Alexandrian) Hellenic Era (c BCE 460-337)

Artakhshast-Artaxerxes Jr., king of Iran, growing number of scholars date ËꞋzᵊr•ã's mission in the (thirty-) seventh year of his reign." BCE 404-359TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 336 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Alexander "the Great" defeats Dar'yawesh 3rd Codomanus, king of Iran at Issus (333) and Gaugamela (331), c BCE 336-330. From c BCE 336-323, Alexander "the Great" Hellenized Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ from Macedonia, the area of northern Greece and Yugoslavia.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 323 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Ptolemy Sr. Soter (367 283), king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim c BCE 323-285TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 301 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Seleucus Sr. Nicator (c BCE 358-280), king of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 c BCE 301-280) founder of the Seleucid dynasty; formerly a Macedonian general serving under Alexander "the Great". He built numerous cities, including Antioch.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 285 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Ptolemy Jr. Philadelphus (c BCE 309-247), king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim c BCE 285-247 LXX is translated in Alexandria, Egypt: first Tor•ãhꞋ, then the rest of Ta•na"khꞋ and the non-canonical books over the next 2 centuries ("Septuagint."TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 280 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Antiochus Sr. Soter (c BCE 324-262-1), king of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 (c BCE 280-262-1)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 261 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Antiochus Jr. Theos (c BCE 287-246), king of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 (c BCE 261-246)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 246 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Ptolemy 3rd Euergetes (c BCE 282? 221), king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim (c BCE 246 221TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 223 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Antiochus 3rd 'the Great' (c BCE 242-187), king of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 (c BCE 223-187). “He … warred successfully against the [Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim] king Ptolemy V and in c BCE 198 obtained possession of all of [Kᵊna•anꞋ] and Lebanon. He later became involved in a conflict with the Romans, who defeated him at Thermopylae in 191 BC and at Magnesia (now Manisa, Turkey) in [BCE 190]. As the price of peace, he was forced to surrender all his dominions west of the Taurus Mountains and to pay costly tribute. Antiochus, who early in his reign had restored the Seleucid Empire, finally forfeited its influence in the eastern Mediterranean by his failure to recognize the rising power of Rome.”TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 205 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Ptolemy V Epiphanes (c BCE 210?-181), king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim (c BCE 205-181). The official coronation of Ptolemy V was held in c BCE 197; it was the occasion on which the Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim priesthood published the decree that forms the trilingual inscription on the Rosetta StoneTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 181 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Ptolemy VI Philometor (c BCE 186?-145), king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim (c BCE 181-145)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 175 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Imposition of Hellenism

Brother Kō•han•eiꞋ ha-Jâ•dōlꞋ:

MōrꞋeih ha-TzëdꞋëq Supplanted By Brother Ko•heinꞋ -RëshꞋa
Hellenization Of Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ

Antiochus 4th Epiphanes (c BCE 215-164), king of (c BCE 175-164) 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 secured possession of Phoenicia and YᵊhūdꞋãh. Thus, the Hellenist 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 became overlords of the Yᵊhūd•imꞋ. From c BCE 171 to 168, Antiochus was involved in a war against Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim, defeating two Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim kings, Ptolemy VI and Ptolemy VII. He captured Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, prohibited Judaism, and imposed the worship of the Hellenist gods.

Yᵊkhōn•yãh Bën-Shim•ōn Jr. Bën-Tzã•dōq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Onias 3rd – the last true Tor•ãhꞋ kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋ), a descendant of A•ha•ronꞋ, was the MorꞋeih ha-TzëdꞋëq (de-Judaized to “Teacher of Righteousness”). He was also a ‘zealot for the laws’ (2 Mac. 4.2).

His rabid Hellenist brother and successor, Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Jason), became the first Hellenist "High Priest", and also the first kō•heinꞋ -RëshꞋa.

Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Jason) went to 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 and obtained from Antiochus the transferal of the office of "High Priest" to himself in return for both a large sum of money and in return for his efforts to assist Antiochus in Hellenizing Judaism.

Under Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Jason), 'Tor•ãhꞋ [Hellenized to displace the word Tor•ãhꞋ with "lawful"] institutions' were abolished and 'new usages contrary to Tor•ãhꞋ' introduced (2 Mac. 4.11). A gymnasium was erected below the citadel and the young men of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim practiced the athletic skills of the Greeks (including the Olympic Games). Even the "priests" left their service at the mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh and took part in the games held in the palestra. The contempt for Jewish customs went so far that many removed their circumcision artificially.

CD (Codex Damascus), the Damascus Document, was a letter from Yᵊkhon•yãh Bën-Shim•on Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein to his brother Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Jason).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 171 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Μενέλαος, "High Priest", of the tribe of Bin•yã•minꞋ, and therefore not a descendant of A•ha•ronꞋ, much less from the Bᵊn•eiꞋ Tzã•dōqꞋ, obtained the "High Priesthood" from Antiochus by offering more money, succeeding Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Jason). Μενέλαος profaned the "Temple" vessels and caused the murder of the MorꞋeih ha-TzëdꞋëq, the former kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋ, Yᵊkhon•yãh Bën-Shim•on Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein. Μενέλαος died c BCE 162.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 170 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tzã•doq ha-kō•hein (Hellenized to Jason) "High Priest" / 'kō•heinꞋ -RëshꞋa' seized the opportunity, when Antiochus made war against Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim, attempting to retake Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim in a surprise attack, to reinstall himself as "High Priest". The attempt failed.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 169 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)Antiochus Epiphanes DecreesTalmud Tractate Rosh haShanah 18b Prohibition Of Pronouncing Proto-Sinaitic hei, for haleil (English: praise-prayProto-Sinaitic wawProto-Sinaitic hei, for haleil (English: praise-prayProto-Sinaitic yod (English: arm reaching-out) (יְהֹוָה)

Antiochus 4th Epiphanes massacred the Jews in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, looted the treasures (the gold Mᵊnōr•ãhꞋ, Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh of Incense and Display-Bread Table), from the Hellenized (Herod's 2nd) "Temple" and had them brought to Antiochus (modern Antakya), Turkey (never to be seen again); dedicating the former Sanctuary to Ζεύς Olympus. Antiochus decreed that the Name Proto-Sinaitic hei, for haleil (English: praise-prayProto-Sinaitic wawProto-Sinaitic hei, for haleil (English: praise-prayProto-Sinaitic yod (English: arm reaching-out) (יְהֹוָה)As vowelized by Middle Ages CE Masoretes in be-Reishit 3.14 could no longer be spoken and that Tōr•ãhꞋ, Sha•bãtꞋ and Bᵊrit Mil•ãhꞋ were capital offenses. (Later, when the Kha•shᵊmōn•ãy•imꞋ came to power,And who, stilll later, gave birth to the Pharisees & rabbis they instituted a new practice: substituting an alternate Biblical descriptive phrase, אֵ֥ל עֶלְיֽוֹן, for the Name. The original practice remains to be restored.)Talmud Tractate Rosh haShanah 18bTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 167 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim: a Hellenist mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh built over "the Great" Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh of burnt-offering on the 15th of Tenthmonth (≈Dec.), and upon it on the 25th of Tenthmonth (probably Dec. 25th, supposed birthday of Ζεύς) the first Hellenist sacrifice was offered to Olympian Ζεύς to whom the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim had been dedicated (1 Mac. 1.54,59). This is 'הַשִׁקּוּץ מְשׁוֹמֵם' (popularly, the 'abomination of desolation') of Dãn•iy•eilꞋ‎ (11.31) /‎ שִׁקּוּץ שֹׁמֵם‎ (12.11).TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 166 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)
Resurgence Of Revivalist (Anti-Hellenist Ōs•inꞋ) Faction Of Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ

Ma•titᵊyãhꞋu from Mo•di•inꞋ, who was a descendant of A•ha•ronꞋ through Yᵊhō•yã•rivꞋ, declared: 'Though all the nations in the king's realm lapse from the religion of their fathers, yet will I, with my sons and brothers, walk in the bᵊrit of our fathers. May ël•oh•imꞋ preserve us from abandoning the Tor•ãhꞋ and the mi•tzᵊw•otꞋ!' He was soon joined by the remaining Kha•sid•imꞋ. Together they raised a covert army. Though Ma•titᵊyãhꞋu is several times referred to as a kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋ, the Yᵊhud•imꞋ did not reconquer Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim (BCE 164) until at least two years after his death (BCE 167-166). Ma•titᵊyãhꞋu’s family were known as the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 165 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

YᵊhudꞋãh ha-Ma•kab•iꞋ assumed the leadership of the Yᵊhud•imꞋ after the death of his fatherTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 164 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

KhaꞋnukh•âh: YᵊhudꞋãh ha-Ma•kab•iꞋ routed the 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 at Emmaus, defeated Lysius (the 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 Imperial Vice-Regent) at Beit-Tzūr and retook Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim (except for the 'Ακρα'). YᵊhudꞋãh ha-Ma•kab•iꞋ demolished the desecrated mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh and erected a new one, replaced the sacred vessels and re-dedicated the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ on the 25th of NinthmonthTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 153 H3Al Alexandrian Hellenic Era (BCE 336-147)

Yo•nã•tãnꞋ Apphus Bën-Ma•titᵊyãhꞋu Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ ha-Ma•kab•iꞋ, kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 145 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Ptolemy VII Euergetes (184?-116 BC), king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim (145-116 BC)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 143 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

YᵊhūdꞋãh recognized as a state / nation by Hellenist 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 ruler Demetrius Jr. (c BCE 149-142)TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 140 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Shi•mᵊōnꞋ Bën-Ma•titᵊyãhꞋu Bën- A•ha•ronꞋ ha-Ma•kab•iꞋ, kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋ, elder brother of Yo•nã•tãnꞋ, appointed by the Beit Din -Jã•dolꞋ, which passed a decree making the office hereditaryTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 135 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE) Pᵊrūsh•imꞋ (Revivalist commoners) Parse-Off From All Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ First-Ever RabbisRainbow Rule

Result: The Three Min•imꞋ

  1. Hellenist Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ (Kō•han•imꞋ & Aristocrats From BCE 165 Coup)
  2. Remnant Kha•shᵊmōn•ãy•imꞋ (Revivalist Kō•han•imꞋ & Aristocrats) Ōs•inꞋ
  3. Pᵊrūsh•imꞋ (Revivalist commoners) & Rabbis

Yokhã•nãnꞋ Hyrcanus Bën-Shi•mᵊōnꞋ Bën- A•ha•ronꞋ, "High Priest" (c BCE 135-104), the rise of the Ōs•inꞋ Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ occurred during the rule of Yokhã•nãnꞋ Hyrcanus. In the early years of his rule, he maintained close relations with the Pᵊrush•imꞋ, who recognized his religious authority (Ma•sëkꞋët Bᵊrãkh•ōtꞋ 29a, Josephus, Antiquities 13.288ff). The rift between the Anti-Hellenist Pᵊrush•imꞋ on the one hand, and the Hellenist Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ and kō•han•imꞋ on the other hand, intensified—and exploded—during the reign of Yokhã•nãnꞋ Hyrcanus.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 104 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Aristobulus Bën-Yokhã•nãnꞋ Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ, "High Priest" (BCE 104-103), succeeds his father Yokhã•nãnꞋ HyrcanusTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 103 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)
Kha•shᵊmōn•ãy•imꞋ Revivalist Ōs•inꞋ-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ Defeated
Enghettoed Themselves In Qū•mᵊr•ãnꞋ

Alexander Yᵊhō•nã•tãnꞋ ('Yan•aiꞋ') Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ, "High Priest" (BCE 103-76), succeeds his father Aristobulus. As leader of the Anti-Hellenist (Kha•shᵊmōn•ãy•imꞋ-Ōs•inꞋ) Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ, Yan•aiꞋ's attempt to establish absolute authority as mëlꞋëkh and "High Priest" brought him into open conflict with the (pseudo-) kō•han•imꞋ and aristocracy of the Roman-promoted Hellenist Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ, resulting in the splintering between the Anti-Hellenist (Kha•shᵊmōn•ãy•imꞋ-Ōs•inꞋ) and Hellenist factions of the Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 67 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Hyrcanus Jr. Bën-Yan•aiꞋ Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ, "High Priest" (eldest son), a Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ appointed by Romans; however, they abolished the monarchy. His brother was Aristobulus Jr.

Aristobulus Jr. Bën-Yan•aiꞋ Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ, "High Priest", wrested the office from his brother Hyrcanus Jr.

Hyrcanus Jr. Bën-Yan•aiꞋ Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ, "High Priest", regained the office with the help of the Romans, and Julius Caesar eventually proclaimed him "High Priest" c BCE 67-40TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 51 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Cleopatra (VII; c BCE 69-30), ill-fated queen of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim (c BCE 51-30), celebrated for her love affairs with Julius Caesar and Mark Antony. Cleopatra, or more precisely, Cleopatra VII, was the daughter of Ptolemy XI Auletes, king of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim. On her father's death in c BCE 51 Cleopatra, then about 17 years old, and her brother, Ptolemy XII, a child of about 12 years, succeeded jointly to the throne of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim with the provision that they should marry. In the third year of their reign Ptolemy, encouraged by his advisers, assumed sole control of the government and drove Cleopatra into exile. She promptly gathered an army in 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 but was unable to assert her claim until the arrival at Alexandria of Julius Caesar, who became her lover and espoused her cause. He was for a time hard pressed by the Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim but ultimately triumphed, and in c BCE 47 Ptolemy XII was killed. Caesar proclaimed Cleopatra queen of Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim.TOC (table of contents)

c BCE 48 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)The Pontificate: The Original Line Of Popes

Julius Caesar (c BCE 100.07.12-3 - 44.03.15) comes to power in Rome. In c BCE 72, he had been elected to the Pontificate, the Hellenist Roman Collegium Pontificum (College of Pontiffs/​Popes) – of the ancient Hellenist Roman religion. TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 47 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)Herod Sr., 'the Great'

was a Bën-Ë•dōmꞋ ("Idumaean" Ben-Eisau/​A•mã•leiqꞋ Arab) supposed proselyte father and a Nabataean (Arab) mother was appointed governor of the Gã•lilꞋ by Antipater. Herod Sr. ("the Great") crushed a rebellion in the Gã•lilꞋ and executed the rebels without a trial. When called to account before the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον, Herod Sr. ("the Great") appeared with an armed guard and intimidated the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 40 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Antigonas, son of Aristobulus, with the help of the Parthians captured Hyrcanus Jr. in Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim from Herod Sr. ("the Great"). Antigonas cut off the ears of Hyrcanus Jr. to disqualify him from the "priesthood". He attached himself to the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ family by becoming betrothed to Mariamne. Herod Sr. ("the Great") escaped from Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 37 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Herod Sr. ("the Great") was reinstalled as king over YᵊhudꞋãh by Rome. Whereupon Herod Sr. ("the Great") executed 45 members of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον who had sided with the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ . At this time he also married Mariamne, granddaughter of Hyrcanus Jr., and became an in-law of the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ family, though he killed many of the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ and eventually killed Mariamne and her sons, except Herod Agrippa Sr. "He also made the appointment to the "high priesthood" dependent on his favor and during his reign dismissed and appointed "high priests" arbitrarily… He established his rule on the basis of Roman patronage…" He became known as Herod "the Great".

Kha•nan•eil, an Egyptian (!) "high priest", was appointed by Herod Sr. ("the Great"), though he was forced to remove him.

Aristobulus 3rd Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ was appointed "high priest" by Herod Sr. ("the Great")TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 36 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Aristobulus 3rd drowned in a swimming pool in Yᵊri•khoꞋ—at the command of Herod Sr. ("the Great"). Aristobulus 3rd was the last Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ "high priest". It was Herod Sr. ("the Great") who placed the Roman eagle upon the facade of the "Temple".

"High Priest" Boethus

Shi•mᵊōnꞋ Bën-Boethus, "high priest", not recorded as a Bën-A•ha•ronꞋ, appointed by Herod Sr. ("the Great")TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 30 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Hyrcanus Jr. killed at command of Herod Sr. ("the Great"), terminating the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ line of kō•han•imꞋ. TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 24 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

"Matthew" Ben-Theophilus Sr., "high priest" succeeding Shi•mᵊōnꞋ Bën-Boethus TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 23 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Yoezer Ben-Boethus, "high priest", succeeded Matthew Ben Theophilus, "high priest" (23-5 BCE), appointed shortly before the death of Herod Sr. ("the Great"). Yoezer Ben-Boethus, "high priest" was a brother of Mariamne, Herod's wife, and of Elazar, who also served as "high priest".TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 7 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)
RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa

Conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter, widely considered the Mã•shiꞋakh planet, in the eastern night sky on BCE 0007.05.29 announced the birth to astronomers in Iran. (Following a star in the East would have led the Persians to Shanghai, on the Pacific coast of China!

Conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter on BCE 0007.10.01 confirms to the Iranian astronomers that the child was recently born in Beit LëkhꞋëm.

Conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter on BCE 007.12.05 confirms to the Iranian astronomers that the house of that night's vigil was that of the child. Yᵊho•shuꞋa was 6 mos. old when they visited.TOC (table of contents)

cBCE 6 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Khanan (Anan) Ben-Sheit "high priest"(c BCE 6 – 15 CE), appointed by Quirinius of 𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 to succeed Yoezer Ben-Boethus. Yo•seiphꞋ KeiphꞋã married Khanan’s daughter. His five sons all served as "high priests": Elazar, Yonatan, Theophilus, Matityahu and KhananTOC (table of contents)

cBCE 4 H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ Bën-Dã•widꞋ, ha-Mã•shiꞋakh, born during the reign of Herod "the Great", who died c BCE 4.

In his last years, Herod Sr. ("the Great") divided his kingdom between his sons Arkhelaus, Herod Antipas, and Philip who was the son of Cleopatra. "After the death of Herod Sr. ("the Great") and the removal of Arkhelaus (4 BCE - ca 6 C.E., the appointment of the "high priest" passed to the Roman governors of the Hellenist Roman occupation of YᵊhudꞋãh.

In the final generation of the "temple" this authority was restored to the dynasty of Herod (Agrippa Sr., Herod of Chalcis, and Agrippa Jr.). During that period a group of well-born wealthy priestly families became established from among whom most of the "high priests" were appointed; such were the Boethus family… According to Ta•lᵊmudꞋ (Ma•sëkꞋët Yom•ãꞋ 18a; Ma•sëkꞋët Yᵊvãm•otꞋ 61a), these "high priests" bought the office from the [Hellenist Roman occupational] government, and they were changed each year. Since an ex-"high priest" kept his additional rights as to dignity and status, there came into being a kind of oligarchy of "high priests" and of their families... were inordinately wealthy… The attitude of most of the people of the Pᵊrush•imꞋ leadership to this Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ oligarchy was given pungent expression (Ma•sëkꞋët Pᵊsãkh•imꞋ 57a, To•sëphꞋᵊtã to Ma•sëkꞋët Mᵊnãkh•ōtꞋ 13.21): ‘Woe is me because of the house of Boethus!’ "TOC (table of contents)

30 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)Sha•maiꞋ vs RibꞋi Hi•leilꞋ

Sha•maiꞋ never attained the predominance enjoyed by RibꞋi Hi•leilꞋ among the Pᵊrush•imꞋ. He was appointed to succeed Mᵊna•kheimꞋ the Ōs•inꞋ as Av Beit Din, serving in that capacity from circ BCE 50 – 30 C.E. However, the Av Beit Din wasn't the Nã•siꞋ. Rather, the Av Beit Din was a vice-president of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον. "Indeed, the main duty of the Av Beit Din was evidently to superintend the administration of the court..." (loc. cit.).

Rainbow Rule
Great (Judean) Συνέδριον
For First Time Ever
Pᵊrush•imꞋ Win Majority Over Hellenist Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ

Under the Hellenist (𐤀𐤓𐤌𐤉𐤀 and Hellenist Roman) occupiers, both before and after the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ, until Ga•mᵊl•i•eilꞋ, the Hellenist pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ kō•han•imꞋ -RëshꞋa controlled both the "Second Temple" and the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον. The Συνέδριον, Hebrew Beit Din -Gã•dolꞋ, was the supreme court exercising authority over regional subordinate, regular, Bât•eiꞋ-Din. These, in turn, exercised authority over local Bât•eiꞋ-Din -Qã•tãnꞋ. Some of the lower courts began to be predominated by the Pᵊrush•imꞋ while many remained, for an indefinite period, predominated by the Roman-collaborating Hellenist Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ (the illegal night court, convening on a holiday and summoning false witnesses could only have taken place in a Roman-collaborating, Hellenist Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ court of the Boethus family. 26.57-68).

It is noteworthy in this regard that Ga•mᵊl•i•eilꞋ was the first to be called by the title of Rab•ãnꞋ (inter alia, Klein, p. 603), suggesting that he was the first of something and strongly intimating that he was the first leader of the Pᵊrush•imꞋ to enjoy a majority in the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον from the Hellenist Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ collaborators with the Roman-occupiers to become Nã•siꞋ. He "flourished" from 20-50 C.E. This would position him to be the Nã•siꞋ who ordained RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa, further implying that the Pᵊrush•imꞋ had finally wrested control of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον between 20-50 C.E.

From the time of the Kha•shᵊmon•ãy•imꞋ until the destruction of the "2nd Temple", nothing is settled with any confidence about the control of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον between the Hellenist Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ versus Pᵊrush•imꞋ with the exception that, it is generally agreed (but still not without dispute), Rab•ãnꞋ Ga•mᵊl•i•eilꞋ ha-Za•qeinꞋ became the first Pᵊrush•iꞋ Nã•siꞋ during some portion of the first half of the first century C.E.

Thus, control of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον was contested between the Hellenist (sycophants of the Roman occupiers) Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ, who comprised the "high priests", on the one hand, and the Pᵊrush•imꞋ (eventually headed by Ga•mᵊl•i•eilꞋ). The primary schism was not between Sha•maiꞋ and RibꞋi Hi•leilꞋ as often assumed.

Conflicting with this timeline, Ency. Jud. states: "The Sadducean hierarchy had its stronghold in the Temple, and it was only during the last two decades of the Temple's existence that the Pharisees finally gained control." Thus, unless this assertion refers to teaching in the "Temple" (the subject of the sentence) and not more specifically to the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον that convened within it, the period from 20-50 C.E. is disputed.

Even this is disputed. Schurer argues that the first rabbinical President of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον to whom the title Nã•siꞋ is applied in the MiꞋshᵊnãh is YᵊhudꞋãh ha-Nã•siꞋ at the end of the second century C.E. In this section, he presents several pages outlining various views of this dispute. I would note, however, that first mention of this title in the MiꞋshᵊnãh neither implies first usage of the term nor the first Pᵊrush•iꞋ occupant of the office. Thus, his arguments are flawed.

The Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ saw Sha•maiꞋ ha-Pᵊrush•iꞋ, as no more than one member of the minority (and, therefore, controllable) Pᵊrush•imꞋ party, who were struggling to gain political ground (support in the street). Backing the minority Pᵊrush•iꞋ leader in the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον served both to pacify the Pᵊrush•imꞋ , split the Pᵊrush•imꞋ and provide the Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ an opportunity to dump their main rival, the legitimate Tzᵊdoq•iꞋ, i.e. (Mᵊna•kheimꞋ the Ōs•inꞋ). This resulted in the Pᵊrush•imꞋ gaining a foothold, in BCE 50, in the Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ-controlled Great (Judean) Συνέδριον—as the second-banana, sort of "Speaker of the House," Av Beit Din.

The Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ, in the person of the "high priest" (kō•heinꞋ -RëshꞋa), still retained the office of Nã•siꞋ, however, in control of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον. As the Roman sycophant Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ "Wicked Priests" continued to become increasingly unpopular and alienated from people, the Pᵊrush•imꞋ apparently managed to parley this foothold into the election, ca 20 C.E., of Ga•mᵊl•i•eilꞋ as the first Pᵊrush•iꞋ Nã•siꞋ.

Rather than consolidating Pᵊrush•imꞋ control over the pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ in the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον, however, this seems to have formalized a schism essentially creating three conflicting and semi-independent rival Great (Judean) Συνέδριον factions:

  1. the Ōs•inꞋ Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ (the MorꞋeih ha-TzëdꞋëq and 'Essenes'), banned from the Hellenized "Temple, many of whom took refuge in Qum•rãnꞋ";

  2. Hellenist Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ sycophants of the Roman-occupiers, each successively labeled the (current) kō•heinꞋ -RëshꞋa (Anglicized to "Wicked Priest"), of their recently Hellenized "Temple," and

  3. the Pᵊrush•imꞋ (rabbinic sect) of bât•eiꞋ kᵊnësꞋët.

Rainbow Rule Crucifixion of RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa Ended Capital Punishment in Judaism

Ram•ba"mꞋ noted (Mi•shᵊn•ëhꞋ Tor•ãhꞋ, SeiꞋphër Yãd ha-Kha•zãq•ãhꞋ, Ma•sëkꞋët Συνέδριον 14.13) that the same year in which the Hellenist Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ faction condemned Ribi Yᵊho•shuꞋa, "adjudications of capital punishment cases were abolished, "they of the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον were banished, and the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον no longer convened in its place in the "Temple"." Consequent to the horrific injustice inflicted by the Hellenist Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ upon RibꞋi Yᵊho•shuꞋa in 30 C.E., the Pᵊrush•imꞋ bolted from the Great (Judean) Συνέδριον to instead establish their Pᵊrush•iꞋ Beit Din in YaꞋvᵊn•ëh.TOC (table of contents)

62 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Hellenist Ananias, "high priest" officiated 3 mos.; appointed by Agrippa Jr. Ananias convened Great (Judean) Συνέδριον and had Pã•qidꞋ Ya•a•qovꞋ "ha-Tza•diqꞋ", Bën-Yo•seiphꞋ, the first Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ Pã•qidꞋ, executed. Ananias is identified by some DSS scholars as the kō•heinꞋ -RëshꞋa ("Wicked Priest"). Succeeded by Matthew Theophilus Jr., "high priest".TOC (table of contents)

67 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

The Sicarii eventually dominated Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim and expelled the aristocratic, Hellenist, sycophants of the Roman occupiers, Pseudo-Tzᵊdōq•imꞋ "priesthood", killing many of them. By lot, they chose Pi•nᵊkhãsꞋ Bën-Shᵊmu•eilꞋ from among the ordinary kō•han•imꞋ to be kō•heinꞋ ha-Jâ•dolꞋ. Pi•nᵊkhãsꞋ had been a stone mason and a relative of RibꞋi Hi•leilꞋ by marriage. Pi•nᵊkhãsꞋ belonged to the watch of Yãkh•inꞋ and served until the destruction of the "Temple" in C.E. 70. Ananias, the former "high priest", and head of current head of the government, tried to suppress the Sicarii by force. Yokhã•nãnꞋ Bën-Lei•wiꞋ, of the Qa•na•imꞋ (Sicarii), from Gush Khã•lãvꞋ, became convinced that Ananias was collaborating with the Hellenist Roman occupiers and joined the Sicarii The Sicarii were later exiled to Mᵊtzãd•ãhꞋ.TOC (table of contents)

69 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Yᵊho•shuꞋa from GaꞋmᵊl•ã "high priest", appointed by Agrippa Jr. (69/70 C.E.), married to Martha daughter of Boethus. Cf. also Ma•sëkꞋët Yᵊvãm•otꞋ 6.4; ibid., 61a; Ma•sëkꞋët Yom•ãꞋ 18a and To•sëphꞋᵊtã ibid.; Ma•sëkꞋët Git•inꞋ 56a). apparently Yᵊho•shuꞋa from GaꞋmᵊl•ã of Josephus as appointed by Agrippa Jr.. Made great strides in Judaic education of children, replaced boxwood lots box with gold lots box. Vehemently anti-Sicarii, killed by Ë•dōm•imꞋ with other opponents of the SicariiTOC (table of contents)

70 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

"Second Temple" destroyed by Hellenist Roman occupiers under Titus.TOC (table of contents)

115 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Great Revolt of Jews in Cyrenaica that spread to Egypt and Cyprus (“Trajan,” EJ 15.1312)TOC (table of contents)

132 CE H4Ro Roman Hellenic Era (BCE 146-134 CE)

Romans, under Hadrian, begin building Aelia Capitolina over the ruins of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim and a Temple of Jupiter over the ruins of the "Second Temple".

Bar-KōkhꞋvã leads revolt against the Hellenist Roman occupiers and recaptures Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyimTOC (table of contents)

135 CE H5Di Displacement Hellenic Era (135 CE-1948)Gentile Roman Hellenists Expel Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ / Jews To Establish
The First, Original (Gentile) Hellenist Roman Christian Church

Hadrian crushes Bar-KōkhꞋvã rebellion and exiles all Jews from "Aelia Capitolina" — which included expelling all of the Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ and the Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ Pã•qidꞋ; which means that there was no connection between the Hellenist Roman occupier expellers (the first & original Christians) and the Jewish expellees (Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ Jews). "Emperor Hadrian made it a capital offense to spread Tor•ãhꞋ and Judaism." (Bereishis, Artscroll, Ib:1439).

In the absence of the expelled Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ, misojudaic (anti-Jew), anti-Tor•ãhꞋ ("antinomian" "law of sin and death") original Hellenist-Christian founders installed the first episkopos: Markus, the first pope (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 4.5.3); marking the Birth of the Christian Church.TOC (table of contents)

333 CE H5Di Displacement Hellenic Era (135 CE-1948)Roman Christian Church (Constantine) Extirpates the Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ

Constantine the Christian required all Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ scattered throughout the Roman Empire to celebrate the idolatrous Hellenist festival to the goddess Easter instead of PësꞋakh and, “while they were leaving the church on Easter day, were forced to eat pork – under pain of death! [Note: This is unknowingly recalled in Christian tradition today: ham is still a Christian tradition on Easter and Christmas.] We know how the [Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ Jews] refused this in order not to transgress the Tor•ãhꞋ to which they held they were bound." At this point, the Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ ceased to exist… until י‑‑ה resurrected them again through His servant, the 16th Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ Pã•qidꞋ Yi•rᵊmᵊyãhꞋu, in 1972 C.E.TOC (table of contents)

c 399 CEH5Di Displacement Hellenic Era (135 CE-1948)

Earliest extant two mss. of Διαθηκη Καινη (NT)TOC (table of contents)

750 CE H5Di Displacement Hellenic Era (135 CE-1948)

Earliest extant ms. of QuranTOC (table of contents)

1948 CEIsrael Period (Menorah)

Delimits and defines1260 Days, enabling deciphering of Daniyeil 12.7TOC (table of contents)

1993 CEIsrael Period (Menorah)

Daniyeil 12.11: 1290 Days Covenant.

For what's coming next, 1335 Days of Daniyeil 12.12, read The 1993 Covenant Live-Link TOC (table of contents)

Rainbow Rule
Pharaonic Names, Meanings & Customs

Each member of the Pharaonic family had several names and titles and, to keep the royal blood pure, intermarried exclusively among themselves, incestuously. Further, Moses (meaning "incarnate") was a Pharaonic surname-like title, conferred upon Pharaonic princes, appended to the name of the Egyptian deity supposedly incarnate in the prince. Moses seems to have been Sen-en-Mut-Moses, the vizier, courtier, confidant and consort of his adoptive older (by 12 years) sister, Khãt-shepꞋset.

Raised from infancy in the royal Tut-moses branch of the Moses family, Sen-en-Mut would have been Sen-en-Mut Tut-moses. Thus, Sen-en-Mut Tut-moses may have succeeded YahYah-kheper en-Ra Tut-moses Jr., who is known to have died early.

Consider the following: “The aged Ineni announces the death of Tut-moses Jr. and the accession of his successor in the following words:

“Having ascended into heaven, he became united with the gods, and his son, being arisen in his place as king of the Two Lands, ruled upon the throne of his begetter, while his sister, the god's wife [Khãt-shepꞋset] governed the land and the Two Lands were under her control…"

“Despite the terse way in which the fact is recorded, there is no reason to think that Tut-moses Jr. died other than a normal death. An almost underdecorated tomb at Biban el-Moluk containing an uninscribed sarcophagus so closely resembles that of Tut-moses Sr. that it is confidently ascribed to the son, and from its neglect one might conjecture that no one cared very much what was his fate; his funerary temple… is a paltry affair. A stela… depicts him accompanied by Queen Yãh-moses, the widow of Tut-moses Sr., and by her daughter the 'king's great wife' [Khãt-shepꞋset], so that the latter had certainly been married to Tut-moses Jr., and since her father was Tut-moses Sr. her claim to the throne was a very strong one… Tut-moses Jr. might never have ruled Egypt but for the early death of Wadj-moses and Amun-moses, the eldest sons of [Yah-kheper ka-Ra Tut-moses Sr.]"

Yah-kheper en-Ra Tut-moses Jr. was too young at the death of his father to succeed him. Consequently, his older wife - Khãt-shepꞋset – ruled, first in his name and then in her own name as Egypt’s only female Par•ohꞋ, Her vizier, courtier, confidant, consort – and perhaps second husband (and second Tut-moses Jr., the one whose tomb was empty), was Sen-en-Mut-moses. Were the deaths Wadj-moses and Amun-moses engineered by Khãt-shepꞋset to bring "Sr.Ꞌsis" (herself) and HōrꞋus-moses to power?

Further, a major insurrection, generalizing Ha•birꞋu to “vile Cush” and eliminating both Khãt-shepꞋset and Tut-moses Jr., is documented to have occurred during the reign of Tut-moses Jr.: “The favors accorded to Ineni were continued and even increased by Tut-moses Jr., the son of Tut-moses Sr. by a lesser queen named Mut-nofre. The reign may have been brief, since Ineni declared himself to have been already old and yet was able to describe conditions under Tut-moses Jr.'s successor; but there is no valid reason for doubting the date of year 18 found upon a broken stela copied by Daressy and now mislaid. The principal monument is a triumphal stela dated in year 1 and set up on the road between Aswan and Philae. This tells with unusual wealth of detail how news was brought of an insurrection in Nubia:

“One came to inform His Majesty that vile Cush had revolted and that those who were subjects of the Lord of the Two Lands had planned rebellion to plunder the people of Egypt and to steal cattle from those fortresses which King ‘Akerperkare' had built in his victories in order to repel the revolted lands and the Nubian tribesman of Khenthennufe; and now a chieftain in the north of vile Cush was falling into a season of disobedience together with two tribesman of Ta-Sti, children of the chieftain of vile Cush who had fled before the Lord of the Two Lands on the day of the Goodly god's slaughtering, this land being divided into five pieces, each man being possessor of his portion.

“On hearing this His Majesty raged like a panther, just as his father had done, and swore that he would not leave alive a single man among them. Thereupon his army overthrew those foreigners, sparing only one of the Nubian chieftain's children who was brought back to Thebes as a captive amid general rejoicing. About Tut-moses Jr.'s other doings little else is heard than that the younger Yãh-moses of el-Kab accompanied him to [Kᵊna•anꞋ] and took many prisoners…” Of course, there was no ‘Palestine’ at that time. For political spin, today’s Egyptians have substituted ‘Palestine’ for Kᵊna•anꞋ.

Also significant is that the sacrifice upon which Moses insisted was a cow, the very deity, Hãt-HōrꞋ, to which the temple of Khãt-shepꞋset—built by Sen-en-Mut—was dedicated. Moreover, Sen-en-Mut’s mother was said to have received a royal scarab directly from Hãt-HōrꞋ – thereby establishing Sen-en-Mut’s (Moses’?) divine selection. Was Moses’ sacrifice a symbolic slaying of Hãt-HōrꞋ, cutting his ties to his idolatrous origins?

Significantly, Tut-moses Jr. and Sen-en-Mut seem to be the only major Egyptian personalities of the period whose tombs never contained a body and were disrespected. This all occurred at the very time that the Ha•birꞋus appeared in Egypt - and “mysteriously” left Egypt! Just as “mysteriously,” Khãt-shepꞋset was so disrespected after her death that all of her images were defaced throughout Egypt and Egyptian history rewritten insofar as possible to eliminate all memory of her and her consort Sen-en-Mut. Why were they considered a disgrace throughout Egypt. Scholars have no other reasonable answer: because of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ?!?

“From this Egyptian myth left on the walls of the pyramids we learn that the Nile delta was where the Egyptians believed IꞋsis had hidden among the bulrushes with her man-god son, HōrꞋus. When Princess Khãt-shepꞋset saw the basket woven of bulrushes ferrying a male baby to her from the Nile, surely she thought, "HōrꞋus!" And it was this association that AmᵊrãmꞋ and Yō•khëvꞋëd had counted on. return to text

Rainbow Rule Ha•birꞋu

The term עִבְרִים is applied in the Bible to Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ (see bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 14.13). It is generally assumed, although denied by some scholars, that the Hebrews are the people called Ha•birꞋu in the tablets found at Akhet-Aten (later renamed: Tël el-Amarna), Egypt; written about 1400 BC, these were found in 1887. This assumption coincides with Biblical tradition; the Amarna correspondence, however, makes no reference to the origin or ethnic character of the Ha•birꞋu. In bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 40.15, Yo•seiphꞋ explains to the Egyptians that he had been kidnapped from “the land of the Hebrews.” In Shᵊm•otꞋ 2.6, the daughter of Par•ohꞋ recognizes -Moses as "one of the Hebrews' children". The implication of these sources is that in early times the Israelis were known to foreigners as Hebrews. return to text

Rainbow Rule Wolfman

The madness of Nᵊvu-khadᵊnëtzꞋar Jr. is corroborated in a cuneiform from Kharan. He stayed in Tei•mânꞋ for seven years while his son, Beil-ᵊsh-a•tzarꞋ, was acting king in his absence.

Ca. BCE 539, when the Persian [modern Iran] king, [Koresh Jr. "the Great"], invaded Bã•vëlꞋ, Nᵊvu-naid (!) was back in the capital. "On the 15th of [Seventhmonth], [the city of] Sippar surrendered to [Koresh Jr. "the Great"] without battle. Nᵊvu-naid fled [leaving Beil-ᵊsh-a•tzarꞋ acting king; ybd]. The next day Bã•vëlꞋ—whose priests, especially the priest of Marduk, opposed him—opened its gates to Koresh… Aramaic fragments from Qum•rãnꞋ relate that while in Tei•mânꞋ, Nᵊvu-naid was afflicted with [שְׁחִין] for seven years [ca. 550-543; ybd] until an unnamed Jewish [גְּזַר], a word which also appears in the Aramaic of Dãn•iy•eilꞋ, advised him to pray to the god of the heavens instead of to the idols… This suggests that the story about the seven years' lycanthropy of Nᵊvu-khadᵊnëtzꞋar Jr. in Dãn•iy•eilꞋ 4…" may have confused Nᵊvu-naid with Nᵊvu-khadᵊnëtzꞋar Jr., BCE 561-539. return to text

Rainbow Rule Antiochus 4th Epiphanes

Hellenist Syrian king Antiochus interpreted the retaking of Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, by Yᵊho•shuꞋa Bën-Tzã•doqꞋ as a revolt against his sovereignty and decided to punish the rebellious city. When he returned from Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim towards the end of BCE 169, he marched in person with his [Syrian] army against Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim, executed a bloodbath there, and looted the immense treasures of the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ, with the help, it is said, of [rabid Hellenist "High Priest"] Μενέλαος [ca. BCE 171-161; successor of Yᵊho•shuꞋa ("Jason") Bën-Shim•onꞋ Jr. Bën-Tza•doqꞋ] himself. All the valuables, amongst them the three great golden vessels from the inner Hei•khãlꞋ, the mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh of Incense, the seven-branched Mᵊnor•ãhꞋ and the Table of the Display Bread, were taken back by him to Antakya, Turkey. "The sanctuary in [Yᵊru•shã•laꞋyim] was to be polluted and called after Ζεύς Olympus" (2nd Macc. 6.1-2).

To ensure that these measures would be permanently implemented, the walls of the city were torn down by Antiochus. The Old City of Dã•widꞋ, however, was re-fortified with an a fortified, observatory tower, citadel – the [Syrian] 'Ακρα' was tall enough to look down into the court of the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ, and was occupied from then on by an idolatrous garrison of Hellenist Syrians. In the words of Dãn•iy•eilꞋ (11.39), ‘He will use the people of a foreign god to defend the fortress.’

Antiochus issued instructions that the services of the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ and observance of Tor•ãhꞋ were to be abolished and idolatrous Hellenist cults to foreign gods were to be substituted instead. The observance of all Judaic ordinances, in particular those relating to Sha•bãtꞋ and circumcision, made capital offense. In every town in YᵊhudꞋãh sacrifice was to be offered to the Hellenist gods . Overseers were sent everywhere to see that the royal command was carried out. Where the people did not comply willingly, they were obliged to do so by force. Once a month a check was made, and whoever was found with a scroll of the Tor•ãhꞋ or had had a child circumcised, was put to death. return to text

Rainbow Rule Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating

Practitioners of the art of archeology (viz. archeologists and Egyptologists) have disagreed—by as much as to two centuries—with scientists' dating of ancient events in the Middle East ever since the emergence of 14 dating in the early 1940s.

As a consequence, archeological/Egyptological datings of the greatest eruption (Thera) in the world of recorded history are taught as having happened at different times, varying by up to two centuries, depending on the location where evidence of the eruption is found. This is because in some places dating has been estimated based on estimated lengths of reigns of rulers in that place while the successions of rulers in other place, including Egypt and the Par•ohꞋs, are rarely able to be cross-matched or fixed to an astronomical or other physical event.

The primary error is not in the sciences (14C, Dendrology, etc.).

Somewhere(s) in the different estimates by the practitioners of the art of archeology/​Egyptology, there is a cumulative error, across the distant ends of the ancient world, of about two centuries of mismatch. It's as if a giant meteorite streaked across the sky in ancient Iraq and took about 2 centuries to land in the Mediterranean! That's not an exaggeration. The Καλλίστη Eruption is scientifically 14C-dated, but is attributed in the archeological-Egyptological arts world as much as almost 2 centuries later.

That the Biblical account of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ describes the Thera event is more certain than nearly all of the archeological-Egyptological datings that are printed everywhere as if they were solidly proven. "Ca", abbreviation for circa, is a tiny indication that sometimes they have very little basis for their dating, and little idea when.

So, this is where the 14C Καλλίστη Eruption vs the earlier, arts-degreed archeologists' dating, c BCE 1453) meets the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ; a ridiculous and impossible 172 year-long Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ and even that ridiculous band-aid doesn't address the enormity of the nearly 2-century gap between the scientists' "high" and practicers of the art of archeology's "low" datings still intensely argued.

As a scientist, I assert with confidence and conviction: the error, or collection of errors, will be found in the practice of the art of archeology-Egyptology, not in the mounting number of scientific specialties all agreeing on the late BCE 17th century dating of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ. So when you see the reign of Par•ohꞋ so-and-so, or Kengiri (Mesopotamian) ruler so-and-so, dated, then you'd be wise to take it with a grain of salt—"yeah, or maybe as much as a couple of centuries earlier" (meaning a higher, negative, number BCE). But until the errors by the "arts" guys are sorted, the Thera eruption and Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ are where the rubber fails to meet the road for the archeologists / Egyptologists. The Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ is more firmly dated by the 14C dating of the Καλλίστη Eruption and not as I had earlier relied on archeologists' (and some geologists') dating c BCE 1453. But crunching the numbers above (i.e., before) the Καλλίστη Eruption, the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ "moves up" 172 years to mesh with the Καλλίστη Eruption event. This will still require finding how the two events mesh, both before and after the correction; i.e., the errors between preceding cross-matched (and if the are meshing cross-matched) events. These can, in all likelihood, only be sorted by the new genre of archeological sciences, not the old school of the arts genre archeologists/​Egyptologists who made the dating mess in the first place. return to text

Rainbow Rule Implications of Sha•bãtꞋ Epoch On Tᵊphil•otꞋ

The six Biblical epochs (days) describe the mᵊlãkh•ãhꞋ of י‑‑ה in setting up the laws governing His forces, which cause the universe to exist and govern its workings, in contrast to the present epoch of His Sha•bãtꞋ in which we live today—in which He has declared that He has ceased to intervene, having defined further intervention as mᵊlãkh•ãhꞋ for Him.

Historically, with the sole exception of Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ and Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ, every inquiry striving to commune with god(s) has been for the purpose of channeling Divine Power: prevailing on god(s) to grant one's prayers. Stated equivalently, it is the quest to harness and take control of the Power of the god(s), to direct the Divine Power as one's own power to achieve one's own purposes! Not only is it foolish to think we know how to do things better than י‑‑ה, it is presumptuous and arrogant. On top of that, to imagine that we will persuade י‑‑ה to do mᵊlãkh•ãhꞋ on His Sha•bãtꞋ, in stark contradiction to commands in the Tor•ãhꞋ that He gave us, borders on the mentality of a chimp. That we would even imagine to influence י‑‑ה to do mᵊlãkh•ãhꞋ on His Sha•bãtꞋ is audacious. Tᵊphil•ãhꞋ is designed, and works, to acknowledge to י‑‑ה when we need His help understanding and dealing with the realities of His Will—enabling us to understand and conform our will to His Will—reality, not changing His Will, "supernaturally" intervening to "tweak" His Perfect Laws to conform to our ideas. See my Effective Prayer Checklist.return to text

Rainbow Rule Biblical Lifespans

There is no accepted interpretation explaining the apparent super-human lifespans and ages of early Biblical characters. Consistent use of the lunar calendar, while explaining the 930 (lunar year) lifespan of ÕdãmꞋ (equating to 77.5 solar years), fails upon yielding an age of 130 (lunar) years for becoming a father (<11 solar years old). There are other examples completely impossible. Still, this was a period in which the lunar calendar was transitioning into the solar calendar, which may factor in with no reliable consistency, and likely help to explain some of the impossibly long lifespans, particularly since, the skewing due to infant mortality rates aside, there was no appreciable difference in lifespan of humans who survived into adulthood in antiquity than adults living today.

This also spans periods in which humans aspired to be gods, great warriors were "graduated" to recognition as (eternal) gods and, later, Par•ohꞋs and other rulers touted themselves to be (eternal) gods. Some ages may be a combination of ancient numerology and honorific years. Thus, it may also be that persons regarded as great in their country and generation, as even mere mention in the Bible implies, were awarded honorific years to their true lifespan in proportion to the perceived greatness: the stalwart of 20 years, of an approximate generation of (≈) 40 years, or of 1 or more centuries, etc.; much as we might award an honorific Ph.D. or Nobel Prize.

While historians who are trying to work out chronologies place great importance on physical lifespans, the physical age may have been irrelevant to the ancients who had no calendar and no sense of history beyond the reigns of a few rulers according to oral family lore. The earliest extant scribes of the Bible were recording important personages and events, not chronology–and even they seemed to acknowledge as much. When they correlated with the histories of surrounding cultures, who had their own chronologies, there were sometimes gaps of uncertainty where the numbers didn't quite correlate.

Nevertheless, while (despite great variations in infant mortality rates and corresponding life expectancies from birth) the lifespans of humans reaching adulthood have been highly consistent throughout the human experiencee. There is little other information upon which to base a chronology. So literal "Biblical" years are best-guesstimates that can, at various points, easily vary by decades and cannot be understood as absolute values in the way we regard them in light of our technology.

Even the reigns of successors to Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh , although the lunar calendar was no longer confused with solar years, may vary by honorific extensions for various reigns in cases where the number of years didn't add up correctly for the earliest extant scribes. For example, whenever "40 years" is found, that is suspiciously like "some uncertain, unaccounted for, yet proper period" to make the numbers seem to work out the best they knew.

On the upside, these nebulous uncertainties allow for a multitude of chronological adjustments and refinements as scientific evidence mounts to resolve the Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating return to text

Rainbow Rule Reign of Shã•ulꞋ: Shᵊmu•eilꞋ ÃlꞋëph 13.1

בֶּן-שָׁנָה שָׁאוּל בְּמָלְכוׂ; וּשְׁתֵּי שָׁנִים, מָלַךְ עַל-יִשְׂרָאֵל.

The connective וּ is ambiguous, allowing 2 interpretations:

  1. Shã•ulꞋ was one year into his reign, and (i.e., then) he reigned two [more] years [for a total of 3 years], or
  2. Shã•ulꞋ was one year into his reign, and he reigned [a total of] two years return to text
Rainbow Rule Dating Methodologies: The Crunch Between Art and Science

Sophomoric arts-oriented supernaturalists, having eschewed science studies, have always read Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 6.1 simplistically; in the same way they read the "6 days of creation," most not even bothering to check the original language, insisting that the building of the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdãshꞋ began exactly in the 480th year after the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ. The result, in each case, has been a time-crunch conundrum–only as much as a couple of centuries in the latter case but off by gigennia relative to creation between arts-oriented methodology versus contradictory and impossibly incompatible scientific methodology.

The earliest codifier of the preceding generations of oral tradition, from which this passage derived, was fully aware of the correct and simpler way of specifying several variations of:

בִּשְׁנַת אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שְׁמוֹנִים מ‫…
(in the year of four hundreds eighty from…)

But, for some–essential–reason, ignored for millennia by superficial sophomores, the scribe wrote something cryptic instead:

בִּשְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה לְ‫…
(in an 80 yearsing. and a 4 hundreds yearsing. to…) leaving Egypt

which the scribe equated to the 4th regnal year of ShᵊlomꞋoh (Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ ÃꞋlëph 6.1).

Whether you begin with early apparent match-ups of history and Bible and follow the chronology forward, begin with important known (well, accepted as known or very close) dates in more recent history (e.g., BCE 586 or 722) and calculate Biblical chronology back into ancient times, or choose some apparent mesh between Bible and history in the middle (say, Par•ohꞋ Ra-moses, bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 47.11; Shᵊm•otꞋ 1.11; 12.37; bᵊ-Mi•dᵊbarꞋ 33.3, 5) and calculate from that point in both directions, Biblical history diverges from the history of other cultures of the Middle East, at some points by nearly two centuries or more. It's inescapable that there were, and remain, periods of uncertain duration cluttering the early scribes attempts to compile a chronology.

The phraseology of Mᵊlãkh•imꞋ Beit 6.1 seems to acknowledge, and allude, to that, suggesting at least two major blocks of time: [1] first, an 80 year block, which = 2 40-year (i.e., uncertain) periods, and [2] second, a 400 year block, which = 10 x 40 years (10 x longer and more uncertain). The initial 40 year period of uncertain duration likely stretches back all the way to the 40 years (uncertain duration) of "wandering" subsequent to the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ. Thus, contrary to later sophomoric supernaturalist interpreters, the scribes who compiled the Biblical chronology seem to have acknowledged periods of uncertainty, guesstimates that allowed for "slosh" in the chronology.

This chronology attempts to match meshing events (e.g., named Israeli kings mentioned relative to named Par•ohꞋs, named kings of Bã•vëlꞋ, 14C-dated events, etc.), then distribute the "slosh" relatively evenly among the intervening 40-year periods where the original scribes seem to have been unsure of the duration and details of a given time. Consequently, many of these dates, while giving the best chronology possible with current information, should be understood not as absolute but, rather, as the best current estimates, strings of which must be allowed to float one way or the other as scientific input continues to flow in and enable refinements. return to text

Rainbow Rule Scientific Definition Of An Ancient Generation

The term generation is most often used to mean the mean period between parent and child. However, generation is also sometimes used in the sense of life-span (frequently confused with life-expectancy), generally approximated as one century.

While 25 years has been universally accepted for some time, even in scientific papers, actual scientific research has shown that, while this is a good estimate for the matriarchal generation, the patriarchal generations is several years longer. In the short term, this isn't very significant. Over many generations, however, the difference becomes critical. Further, "[w]ith the growing application of DNA testing to both anthropology and genealogy, the length of a generation takes on far more importance than it had in the past. Many conclusions from DNA evidence in both disciplines are frequently expressed in terms of generations back to a common ancestor, based on the very slow rate at which random changes or mutations take place in DNA patterns over a number of generations."

"In the first of the three more recent studies of generation length, sociologist Nancy Howell calculated average generational intervals among present-day members of the !Kung. These are a contemporary hunter-gatherer people of Botswana and Namibia whose life style is probably close to that of all our pre-agricultural ancestors in the dim past. The average age of mothers at birth of their first child was 20 and at the last birth 31, giving a mean of 25.5 years per female generation — considerably above the 20 years often attributed to primitive cultures. Husbands were six to 13 years older, giving a male generational interval of 31 to 38 years." (viz., 35 years). (Donn Devine, International Society Of Genetic Genealogy, 2016.06.08) return to text

Rainbow Rule Reconciling A Seemingly Self-Contradicting Chronology

Supernaturally-long lifespans aside (י‑‑ה can never contradict Himself by breaking His perfect laws to accomplish reality; it's sophomoric human interpreters who are the simpletons), whatever year one fixes for the birth of Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh, the genealogy, via Pã•rëtzꞋ, back to the birth of Av•rãmꞋ (521 years) is less than the chronology, via the Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ, back to the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ (571 years)! That impossibly implies that Mosh•ëhꞋ and the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ happened before Av•rãmꞋ was born! This is one facet of the conundrum between the High vs Low Dating between the arts-degreed archeologists practicing archeology as an art versus the new breed of archeological scientists.

The obvious impossibility forces any reasonable person to acknowledge that these alternate chronologies did not apply modern methodology dependent on modern technology; nor even the same methodology within the period. This forces us to scrutinize what constitutes a generation as well as ancient lifespans. The most plausible way that the period of the Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ (viz., Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh back to the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ) can mesh with the genealogy through Pã•rëtzꞋ (viz., from Dã•widꞋ ha-MëlꞋëkh back to Tã•mãrꞋ, YᵊhudꞋãh, Yi•tzᵊkhãqꞋ and Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ) is that the shorter (Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ) line uses a generation of approx. 35 years while the longer (Pã•rëtzꞋ) line apparently highlights the most important patriarch from each century. The "century generation" seems to be abandoned in favor of the 35-year generation within the first and last century (of 3, ≈35-year, generations). This methodology I developed and used in this chronology is the only methodology to date that reconciles the impossible gap between "High" and "Low" Datings.

Interestingly, there is never even the slightest hint in the Bible of any birthday being noted; as if actual physical years weren't actually counted and had nothing at all to do with the ancient perception of one's "days." In this time before calendars as we know them, the year was anchored only to the regnal year of the ruler, strings of years that were routinely reset. This seems to be complicated by some who have children around age 25 while others seem to begin having children around 125-130. Taken together, this all suggests that the 100 years is assigned as some distinction rather than years physically lived. Looking at the Sho•phᵊt•imꞋ vs Pã•rëtzꞋ imbalance, it cannot be coincidental that the math works out when the "century count" middle of the line is understood as grandfather to great-grandson macro-view, and equated to a "patriarch of the family century" 100 years, while the immediate unit at each end (grandfather to son to grandson micro-view) equates to an immediate-family unit count, 25-year generation between grandfather, son and grandson.

This also seems to offer an answer to how Yi•sᵊr•ã•eilꞋ was "130" when he spoke with Par•ohꞋ in Mi•tzᵊraꞋyim. He was his family's current "century patriarch," adding 100 to his "days." But, in his own words, he valued his days as few, 30–despite clearly being more advanced in physical years lived according to events in his life.

In short, one's "days" or "years" in post-NōꞋakh antiquity seem to have been an indication of one's position in one's own family, marking a family's patriarchal century, or one's place within the family's patriarchal century, and to reflect the perception of one's achievements, or failures; not strict physical age that we mark today. This is apparently further complicated by different perspectives of "age" that varied according to region and culture.

Pre-NōꞋakh years in NW Kengir (Mesopotamia; i.e. modern NE Turkey on the southwest coast of the Black Sea) seem to be measured in lunar years (months). Dividing by 12 yields lifespans realistic to scientific findings—which introduces a reality into what has long been regarded as an age of supernatural lifespans. We must remember that there were no long-term calendars to relate to; plus, "history" in those days amounted only to what we now think of as family lore passed down orally.

Post-NōꞋakh years in Kᵊna•anꞋ, by contrast, apparently marked patriarchal centuries, pre-NōꞋakh years seem to have reflected patriarchal millennia or more. In other words, while QaꞋyin and H evꞋël were, indeed, "sons" of ã•dãmꞋ, we don't know, and shouldn't claim to know, how many intervening descendants may have lived in the interim, between what may have been "millennial patriarchs".

Egypt seems to have applied a still-different perspective to one's age that indicated whether a person had endured through a period of particular hardship, which Egyptians equated to the number 70, derived from the heliacal setting below the horizon (which they viewed as the netherworld) of their IꞋsis-star Sirius. Hence, '70 years' added to one's "days" is associated with having endured some particular hardships (famines, loss of a family member, etc.).

Setting up all of the most well-known, thought to be "fixed," dates on a spreadsheet program, a few experiments with varying the 35-year generation and other balancing strategies brought the chronology into balance so that AmᵊrãmꞋ, as calculated from the spreadsheet calculation of Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ's birth, was 25 years old when his eldest son, A•ha•ronꞋ, was born; ergo, 28 when Mosh•ëhꞋ was born. Not bad, given that calculations from virtually any other mathematically consistent chronology, uh, oops, there isn't any other chronology that is mathematically consistent across its entirety. return to text

Rainbow Rule Internal Contradictions & Gaps Resolved By Spreadsheet Version

There are countless internal, intractable contradictions within Biblical chronology; screaming to any reasonable person that these were the "best guess" oral history handed down from generation to generation for countless generations. They didn't even have long-term calendars back then to relate to or provide perspective! Their interest was how, in general concepts, not precisely when, nor chronological precision–an idea not even imagined in the embryonic development of a historical story; nor taken seriously until dating technology of recent years in the modern era—which, today, still has an unresolved 2-century gap!

Only supernaturally long lives permit the generations from Yo•seiphꞋ's contemporary nephew when he was sold into Mi•tzᵊraꞋyimPã•rëtzꞋ to his son Khë•tzᵊr•ōnꞋ to his son AmᵊrãmꞋ to his son Mosh•ëhꞋ at the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ—to span 430 years.

To give their parallel descendants in the genealogy similarly consistent supernaturally-long lifespans pushes the dating of the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ down past the reign of ShᵊlomꞋoh ha-MëlꞋëkh, requiring the preposterous contradiction that Av•rãmꞋ was born after the reign of ShᵊlomꞋoh ha-MëlꞋëkh—among countless other distortions and internal contradictions.

See the spreadsheet version of this work for the bare-bones framework essential to balancing the entire tree so that all the numbers are, for the first time in history, consistent at all critical junctures. The spreadsheet doesn't pretend that each number is correct. That is an impossible goal. Rather, the spreadsheet focuses on several critical junctures, (particularly the events of BCE 586, 722, the 14C-dated Καλλίστη Eruption coinciding with the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ, and the necessity of the lifespans of Yo•seiphꞋ-YᵊhudꞋãh, to Qᵊhãt, to AmᵊrãmꞋ to Mosh•ëhꞋ meshing with the line of Pã•rëtzꞋ at the Yᵊtzi•ãhꞋ).

While there are surely numerous errors of a few years in one direction, there are complementary opposite and, crucially, all events are within reasonable expectations and, critically, the equation at all critical junctures implies equal errors in the opposite direction elsewhere so that the entire tree balances at all critical junctures, presenting the closest approximation—closer by centuries—than any previous attempts. It is also the only tree to finally reconcile the Egyptologists' & Archeologists' "Low" Dating vs Scientists' "High" Dating  gap. return to text

Rainbow Rule Conundrums Of Numerology In Calendric Transition

This is the period in which the mixture of lunar and solar calendars gives way to exclusively solar calendars. However, it would appear that, during this transition, in an age in which seniority and reputation meant everything, a man's age in solar years might be dismissed as junior, even childish, relative to the age of someone still intercalating their age in lunar years. Thus, it appears that different, sometimes conflicting, methods of numerology were used to "adjust" a solar age that was much smaller than the lunar ages of juniors in the area in order to produce respect consistent with one's true age.

It appears that numerology became the primary corrective factor. Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ died at the perplexing age of 175 (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 25.7-8). We know from scientific examinations of every body from every period that this was too old for natural lifespan (a supernaturalist self-contradicting god aside) but too young to be lunar years. Adding 100 to the solar age as a factor seems to have designated the patriarch of the family at the time and would have indicated that Avᵊrã•hãmꞋ died at the age of 75. But transition seems to have been ongoing during his lifetime since that's contradicted by other ages at various events in his life. For example, Av•rãmꞋ left Khã•rãnꞋ at age 75 (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 12.4). So how is his age at that event to be explained?

The earliest extant scribes, and perhaps the oral lore historians themselves, seem to have used the number 40 much like we use "x" or "n" today (e.g., a vacation of "n" number of days); but to express a "fudge factor" chronological gap, where the information is inconsistent and doesn't add up correctly; an uncertain modal generation of 20-50 years or so: "40 years"return to text

Rainbow Rule The Ma•bulꞋ
3D Black Sea map
Click to enlarge3D Black Sea map (historum.com)

Legitimate scientists (sifting out the endless myth-agenda quacks in internet searches to find recognized geologists and related scientists from prestigious universities like Stanford) find no evidence within 3 millennia that could form any credible basis for the Ma•bulꞋ. Scientists pinpoint the most likely event to which the Ma•bulꞋ referred as the Mediterranean-Aegean Sea bursting through the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits separating Asian-Continent northern Turkey from European-Continent northern Turkey, flooding the Black Sea c BCE 5500, millennia before NōꞋakh was born.

There are at least a couple of ways in which this could explain NōꞋakh being associated with the flood:

NōꞋakh died at age 950 (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 9.29). This is also expressed in lunar years (months), equating to slightly over 79 solar years old. (bᵊ-Reish•itꞋ 5.28).return to text



Pay it forward (Quote & Cite):

Yirmeyahu Ben-David. Chro­no­lo­gy (2023.10.17). Netzar­im Jews World­wide (Ra'anana, Israel). https://www.netzarim.co.il/Shared/Glossary/Chronology.htm (Retrieved: Month Da, 20##).

Rainbow Rule © 1996-present by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David,
Rainbow Rule
Go Top Home (Netzarim Logo) Go Back

Nᵊtzãr•imꞋ… Authentic