Home (Netzarim Logo)

"Occupation" Part 5

Paqid Yirmeyahu (Paqid 16, the Netzarim)
Pâ•qidꞋ  Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhu

2002.04.10

  1. Israel gave the 'Palestinians' weapons, nine cities, 60 towns, autonomy over 95% of 'Palestinian' population and offered more than Israel could live with in the long run at Camp David. Thus, 'Palestinian' claims of “occupation” have been bogus from the get-go. What did Israel get in return? The predicted stream of broken promises & terrorist atrocities! After 10 (count ’em, ten) “Israel-only ceasefires” in which, every time, Arafat & his 'Palestinian' terrorists shot-up and blew-up non-combatant Jews, the world – & Pres. GW Bush – wants to re-run this miso-Judaic movie repeatedly, ad nauseum.

  2. Terrorism is clearly documented to predate the 1967 initiation of 'Palestinian' complaints of “occupation” and, therefore, cannot be a cause of 'Palestinian' terrorism.

  3. Paliban vs Tzahal
    Click to enlarge Paleban Terrorist vs Israeli Soldier

    There is no justification for terror in any case! This is especially hypocritical from 'Palestinians' accusing Israel of “collective punishment” of “innocent civilians” (more than 64% of whom are active supporters of suicide-bombing terrorism according to 'Palestinian' Center for Public Opinion poll. These are the so-called “innocent civilians” who, deliberately putting themselves and their children in harm’s way to shield terrorists, beg injury and the “glory” of “Is•ti•shᵊhâdꞋ”. It’s obscene for the media to equate terrorists who deliberately target Jews – civilian women, children and the elderly – with their Jewish victims who, in self-defense and utmost precision routinely subject Israeli soldiers to unreasonable risks of death to avoid injuring human shields whom Muslim terrorists deliberately place in harm's way for the “glory” of “Is•ti•shᵊhâdꞋ”. Indeed, subjecting Israeli soldiers to undue risks to save active supporters of terrorists is insane, self-destructive and must be stopped!

  4. No “foreign power” can be defined for disputed land! By definition, therefore, disputed land cannot be “occupied.” The UN has never dictated sovereign borders in these areas (nor has it the authority or mandate to impose it; borders are to be negotiated by the parties).

  5. Before 1964, Arabs vehemently denied being 'Palestinians' and even the term 'Palestinians' referred only to Jews!

  6. First, however, unless world history began in 1967 or 1948, the documented history of this land demonstrates that sovereignty belonged to the Jews and has never been legitimately transferred to anyone else. Correct descriptions, therefore, are Arab-occupied Shᵊkhëm (Arabized Hellenist “Nablus”), Arab-occupied Khë•vᵊr•on (Hellenized Hebron), Arab-occupied Beit Lëkhëm (Hellenized Bethlehem), Arab-occupied Ramallah, Arab-occupied East Yᵊru•shâ•layim and the Arab-occupied Har ha-Bayit (Hellenized "Temple Mount")!!!

Rainbow Rule © 1996-present by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David,

Int'l flags


Go Top Home (Netzarim Logo) Go Back

Nᵊtzâr•im… Authentic